Pleasant-Bey v. Luttrell et al
Boaz Pleasant-Bey |
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, William Oldham, Rodgers, Hawkins, Coleman, Moore, Bowers, McGee and Unknown Persons In Shelby Co. Jail Administration |
2:2011cv02138 |
February 15, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Memphis Office |
Shelby |
Charmiane G. Claxton |
James D. Todd |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 129 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 138 Plaintiff's Objections to 136 the Magistrate Court's Order, and Amending Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 2/1/2021. (ljt) |
Filing 105 ORDER Granting 54 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; Denying 59 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 09/07/2018. (pab) |
Filing 93 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO AMEND COMPLAINT, DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL WITNESSES, AND DENYING MOTION FOR CASE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION 71 76 77 89 90 . Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 3/31/16. (Todd, James) |
Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 24 28 , ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND WITHOUT PREJUDICE 26 , ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION AS MOOT 36 , ORDER CERTIFYING AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND NOTICE OF APPELLATE FILING FEE. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 9/25/12. (Todd, James) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.