Cases 1 - 10 of 4,535
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00401
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodgers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv00091
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner and Martin J O
Plaintiff:
Michael J Rodgers
Interested Party:
SSAOgcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heberer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Bruce Heberer, Pliny Jackson III, James Roper and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Carl Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 24-1759
Plaintiff:
CARL E. RODGERS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JEFFREY STINE, DEAN SHIPE and others
Fosbinder v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Rodger Fosbinder
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Janet Elaine Patterson and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
MAROCHEK-RODGERS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. et al
as 3:2024cv05393
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LYNN MAROCHEK-RODGERS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
