Hyatt v. Vidal
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Case Number: 1:2022cv00675
Filed: June 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Ivan D Davis
Referring Judge: Michael S Nachmanoff
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 the Parties' Agreed Motion to Stay the Case. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 11/08/2022. (dvanm)
October 20, 2022 Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Related Case by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DeLaquil, Mark)
October 17, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Hugham Chan on behalf of Katherine K. Vidal (Chan, Hugham)
October 17, 2022 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Gilbert P. Hyatt by Katherine K. Vidal.(Chan, Hugham)
September 12, 2022 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Katherine K. Vidal, filed by Gilbert P. Hyatt.(DeLaquil, Mark)
September 12, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gilbert P. Hyatt. Katherine K. Vidal served on 8/30/2022, answer due 10/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service (U.S. Attorney General), #2 Affidavit of Service (U.S. Attorney for the EDVA))(DeLaquil, Mark)
June 16, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Katherine K. Vidal, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm)
June 14, 2022 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (dvanm)
June 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE by Gilbert P. Hyatt (Proposed AO 120 Form) (DeLaquil, Mark)
June 14, 2022 Filing 4 Proposed Summons to the U.S. Attorney for the EDVA by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark)
June 14, 2022 Filing 3 Proposed Summons to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark)
June 14, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons to the Attorney General of the United States by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark)
June 14, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8431954.), filed by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DeLaquil, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hyatt v. Vidal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Represented By: Mark Wendell DeLaquil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Represented By: Hugham Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?