Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Burandt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff: Corliss O. Burandt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
In re: Mazed
as 24-1756
Appellant: In re: MOHAMMAD A. MAZED
Defendant / Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Cahill
as 24-1745
Appellant: In re: BRET EDWARD CAHILL
Defendant / Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
In re: Amoss
as 24-1617
Appellant: In re: MATTHEW AMOSS
Defendant / Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Blue Buffalo Enterprises, Inc.In re: Blue Buffalo Enterprises, Inc.
as 24-1611
Appellant: In re: BLUE BUFFALO ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00459
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?