Hyatt v. Vidal
| Gilbert P. Hyatt |
| Katherine K. Vidal |
| 1:2024cv00022 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Katherine K. Vidal, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney) (Dest) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark) |
| Filing 6 FILED IN ERROR AND REMOVED (Dest) (Main Document 6 replaced on 1/8/2024) (Dest, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/8/2024) (Dest). Modified on 1/8/2024 (Dest). |
| Notice of Correction re #3 Proposed Summons to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The Clerk's office has removed the previously issued summons as to defendant Kathy Vidal, Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The Clerk's office does not issued summons to be served a P.O. Box. The filing user has notified to refile the proposed summons as to this defendant with a service address (no P.O. Box) (Dest) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (Dest) |
| Filing 5 Report on the filing or determination of an action (Proposed AO 120 Form) , filed by Gilbert P. Hyatt (DeLaquil, Mark) Modified to correct docket event on 1/8/2024 (Dest). |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons to the U.S. Attorney for the EDVA by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons to the Attorney General of the United States by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9296675.), filed by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DeLaquil, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hyatt v. Vidal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt | |
| Represented By: | Mark Wendell DeLaquil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
