I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Date Filed	#	Document Text
April 21, 2014	1099	ORDER granting 1092 Motion to Stay. Because the parties have agreed to stay the payments, the basis for the accounting outlined in the Court's 8/14/13 Order no longer exists pending that stay. However, if the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit enters a final judgment in plaintiff's favor, the Court will require Defendants to IMMEDIATELY produce the U.S. revenue attributable to their use of AdWords and the calculation of the royalty payment for past quarters. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/18/14. (afar, )
April 17, 2014	1098	REPLY to Response to Motion re 1092 MOTION to Stay of Requirement that Defendants Provide Revenue Information and Calculations of Ongoing Royalty Payments filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
April 14, 2014	1097	STIPULATION re 1096 Proposed Stipulation by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/11/14 and filed on 4/14/14. (tbro)
April 11, 2014	1096	STIPULATION by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
April 10, 2014	1095	Opposition to 1092 MOTION to Stay of Requirement that Defendants Provide Revenue Information and Calculations of Ongoing Royalty Payments filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
April 2, 2014	1094	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 975 Declaration, of Filing of Corrected Exhibit (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)
March 27, 2014	1093	Memorandum in Support re 1092 MOTION to Stay of Requirement that Defendants Provide Revenue Information and Calculations of Ongoing Royalty Payments filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
March 27, 2014	1092	MOTION to Stay of Requirement that Defendants Provide Revenue Information and Calculations of Ongoing Royalty Payments by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
February 11, 2014	1091	Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 14-1289 for 1089 Notice of Appeal, filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. (14-1289) (tbro)
February 7, 2014	1090	Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Federal Circuit re 1089 Notice of Appeal. Appeal Package emailed to the Federal Circuit. (tbro)
February 5, 2014	1089	NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 1086 Memorandum Opinion, 963 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, 1088 Memorandum Opinion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0422-3840302. (Noona, Stephen)
January 28, 2014	1088	MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/28/14. (tbro)
January 24, 2014	1087	TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation before Judge Jackson, (Noona, Stephen)
January 22, 2014		Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard:Settlement Conference held on 1/22/2014. (cdod, )
January 21, 2014	1086	MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/21/14. (tbro)
January 21, 2014		Reset Hearings: Settlement Conference set for 1/22/2014 at 01:00 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (cdod, )
January 21, 2014		Set Hearings Telephone Conference set for 1/21/2014 at 02:30 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (cdod, )
January 14, 2014	1085	STIPULATION by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
January 14, 2014	1084	Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 14-1233 for 1082 Notice of Appeal filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. (14-1233) (tbro)
January 13, 2014	1083	Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Federal Circuit re 1082 Notice of Appeal. Appeal Package emailed to the Federal Circuit 1/13/14. (tbro)
January 10, 2014	1082	NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 960 Memorandum Opinion,, 1081 Memorandum Opinion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0422-3809476. (Noona, Stephen)
January 3, 2014	1081	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/3/14. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1080	ORDER granting 1049 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc December 23, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1079	ORDER granting 1045 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc November 11, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1078	ORDER granting 1029 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 31, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1077	ORDER granting 1025 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 30, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1076	ORDER granting 1017 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 30, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1075	ORDER granting 1011 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 28, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1074	ORDER granting 1000 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 21, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1073	ORDER granting 995 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 4, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1072	ORDER granting 970 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc August 26, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1071	ORDER granting 965 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc August 21, 2013. (tbro)
December 23, 2013	1070	ORDER granting 936 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013, Nunc Pro Tunc May 13, 2013. (
December 23, 2013	1069	ORDER granting 954 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013, Nunc Pro TuncJune 21, 2013.
December 23, 2013	1068	ORDER granting 958 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013, Nunc Pro Tunc July 31, 2013.
December 23, 2013	1067	ORDER granting 987 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013.
December 23, 2013	1066	ORDER denying 1006 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013.
December 23, 2013	1065	ORDER denying 1021 Motion. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 21, 2013.
December 23, 2013	1064	ORDER finding as moot 1041 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013.
December 18, 2013	1063	ORDER granting 1062 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Emily Christina O'Brien terminated. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/18/13. (tbro)
December 13, 2013	1062	Consent MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Consent Motion and Memorandum In Support Of Consent Motion To Withdraw Appearance of Attorney Emily OBrien) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 11, 2013	1061	Settlement Conference Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 12/11/13. (tbro)
December 4, 2013		Set Hearings: Settlement Conference set for 1/22/2014 at 09:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (cdod, )
November 18, 2013	1060	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 963 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, Joint Submission Regarding Court Ordered Meet and Confer Regarding Post-Judgment Royalties (Schultz, Donald)
November 18, 2013	1059	CERTIFICATE of Service re 1052 Opposition, by Jeffrey Kirk Sherwood on behalf of I/P Engine, Inc. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 18, 2013	1058	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 11-07-2013, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden,OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 12/18/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/21/2014. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/18/2014.(borden, sharon)
November 18, 2013		Notice of Correction re 1052 Opposition, Please file the Certificate of Service as a separate document. Use the Certificate of Service event (under notices) and link the Certificate of Service to the document it was omitted from. (tbro)
November 15, 2013	1057	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1044 Order on Motion for Order to Show Cause, in Response to the Court's November 7, 2013 Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 15, 2013	1056	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 1044 Order on Motion for Order to Show Cause, in Response to the Court's November 7, 2013 Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Noona, Stephen)
November 13, 2013	1055	Reply to Motion re 1021 MOTION Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order re 1020 Memorandum, and Proposed Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Schultz, Donald)
November 12, 2013	1054	Sealed Document re 1052 Opposition. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)
November 12, 2013	1053	Sealed Document re 1048 Reply. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)
November 11, 2013	1052	Opposition to 1033 Sealed Document Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in Support of Opposition)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 11, 2013	1051	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1049 MOTION to Seal Opposition to Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order and the Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in support of its Opposition (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 11, 2013	1050	Memorandum in Support re 1049 MOTION to Seal Opposition to Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order and the Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in support of its Opposition filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 11, 2013	1049	MOTION to Seal Opposition to Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order and the Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in support of its Opposition by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 11, 2013	1048	Reply to 963 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, Defendants Responsive Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
November 11, 2013	1047	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 1045 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Defendants Responsive Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order (Noona, Stephen)
November 11, 2013	1046	Memorandum in Support re 1045 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Defendants Responsive Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
November 11, 2013	1045	MOTION to Seal Portions Of Defendants Responsive Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
November 7, 2013	1044	ORDER denying 978 Motion for Order to Show Cause. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff and Defendant each provide the Court with names of two (2) experts unaffiliated with any of the parties who are capable of determining whether Google's re-design of its infringing system is no more than a colorable variation ofthe adjudged infringing system by November 15, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/7/13. (afar)
November 7, 2013	1043	Motion Hearing held before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/7/2013 re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. Attorneys Donald Schultz, Frank Cimino, Jr., Charles J. Monterio, Jr. and Jonathan Falkler appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. Attorneys David Perlson, David Nelson, Jennifer Polse, and Stephen Noona appeared on behalf of the defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc. and Target Corporation. Comments of the Court. Argument of counsel heard. Court DENIES plaintiffs #978 Motion. Court DIRECTS the parties to forward names of two individual experts who are capable and competent to evaluate the design around of the patent by Nov. 15, 2014. Court to issue an order. Court adjourned. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom, )
November 5, 2013	1042	Memorandum in Support re 1041 MOTION for Leave to File to File Response to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Ru filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)
November 5, 2013	1041	MOTION for Leave to File to File Response to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
November 1, 2013	1040	Sealed Document re 1029 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 Order, 1030 Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)
November 1, 2013	1039	Sealed Document re 1029 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 Order, 1030 Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)
October 31, 2013	1038	Sealed Document re 1028 Memorandum. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)
October 31, 2013	1037	Sealed Document re 1024 Declaration. (tbro)
October 31, 2013	1036	Sealed Document re 1024 Declaration. (tbro)
October 31, 2013	1035	Sealed Document re 1024 Declaration. (tbro)
October 31, 2013	1034	Sealed Document re 1022 Memorandum in Support. (tbro)
October 31, 2013	1033	Sealed Document re 1020 Memorandum. (tbro) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2013: # 1 Letter) (tbro, ).
October 31, 2013	1032	Memorandum in Support re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER (Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts) filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 31, 2013	1031	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1029 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 O rder and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 31, 2013	1030	Memorandum in Support re 1029 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 O rder and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 31, 2013	1029	MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 Order and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 30, 2013	1028	Memorandum Opening Brief on Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, # 2 Declaration of Dr. Stephen Becker)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 30, 2013	1027	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1025 MOTION to Seal I/P Engines Opening Brief on Post-Judgment Royalties and accompanying Declarations of Drs. Stephen Becker and Ophir Frieder (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 30, 2013	1026	Memorandum in Support re 1025 MOTION to Seal I/P Engines Opening Brief on Post-Judgment Royalties and accompanying Declarations of Drs. Stephen Becker and Ophir Frieder filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 30, 2013	1025	MOTION to Seal I/P Engines Opening Brief on Post-Judgment Royalties and accompanying Declarations of Drs. Stephen Becker and Ophir Frieder by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 30, 2013	1024	Declaration re 1022 Memorandum in Support, (Declaration Of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence And Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Public Version), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Public Version), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Public Version))(Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2013	1023	Declaration re 1022 Memorandum in Support, (Declaration of Kristan Burch in Support of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2013	1022	Memorandum in Support re 1021 MOTION Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order re 1020 Memorandum, and Proposed Order (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2013	1021	MOTION Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order re 1020 Memorandum, and Proposed Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2013	1020	Memorandum (Defendants' Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order)(Public Version) to 963 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2013	1019	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 1017 MOTION to Seal (Motion To Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; (2) Portions Of The Brief In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; and (3) Exhibits 1-3 Of The Declaration Of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order (Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2013	1018	Memorandum in Support re 1017 MOTION to Seal (Motion To Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; (2) Portions Of The Brief In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; and (3) Exhibits 1-3 Of The Declaration Of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2013	1017	MOTION to Seal (Motion To Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; (2) Portions Of The Brief In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; and (3) Exhibits 1-3 Of The Declaration of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2013	1016	ORDER granting 993 Motion for Leave to File Additional Facts Justifying Its Motion for Defendants to Show Cause under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with August 13, 2013 Order. The supplement shall not exceed ten (10) pages including any attachments. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 30, 2013.
October 29, 2013	1015	Sealed Document. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Letter)(tbro)
October 28, 2013	1014	REPLY to Response to Motion re 993 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 28, 2013	1013	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1011 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 28, 2013	1012	Memorandum in Support re 1011 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 28, 2013	1011	MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 22, 2013	1010	*SEALED* re 1005 Exhibits 6-10 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Memorandum (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 6, # 2 Exhibit 7, # 3 Exhibit 8, # 4 Exhibit 9, # 5 Exhibit 10).(bgra)
October 22, 2013	1009	SEALED* re 1004 DECLARATION OF KRISTIN ZMRHAL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTALMEMORANDUM REGARDING MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE. (bgra)
October 21, 2013	1006	MOTION to Strike 998 Memorandum in Support,,, of Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 21, 2013	1005	Declaration re 1003 Opposition, (of Joshua L. Sohn) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15)(Noona, Stephen)
October 21, 2013	1004	Declaration re 1003 Opposition, (of Kristin Zmrhal) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause (Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 21, 2013	1003	Opposition to 993 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 21, 2013	1002	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 1000 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of the Declaration of Kristin Zmrhal in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintifif's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause; (2) Portions of Exhibits 6-8 to the Dec (Noona, Stephen)
October 21, 2013	1001	Memorandum in Support re 1000 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of the Declaration of Kristin Zmrhal in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintifif's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause; (2) Portions of Exhibits 6-8 to the Dec filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 21, 2013	1000	MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of the Declaration of Kristin Zmrhal in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintifif's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause; (2) Portions of Exhibits 6-8 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support Thereof; and (3) Exhibits 9-10 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support Thereof by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 18, 2013		Set Hearing as to 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER. Motion Hearing set for 11/7/2013 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (ptom)
October 8, 2013	1008	*SEALED* re 995 MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with attachments filed 10/8/13. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(bgra)
October 8, 2013	1007	*SEALED* re 999 DECLARATION OF CHARLES J. MONTERIO, JR. IN SUPPORT OF I/P ENGINE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUMOF ADDITIONAL FACTS filed 10/8/2013.(bgra)
October 7, 2013	999	Declaration re 998 Memorandum in Support,,, of Charles J. Monterio, Jr., in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 7, 2013	998	Memorandum in Support re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER, 993 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order, 995 MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with Exhibits A and C and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 7, 2013	997	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 995 MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with Exhibits A and C and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 7, 2013	996	Memorandum in Support re 995 MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with Exhibits A and C and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. In Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 7, 2013	995	MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with Exhibits A and C and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. In Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 7, 2013	994	Memorandum in Support re 993 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 7, 2013	993	MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 2, 2013	992	ORDER finding as moot 981 Motion to Shorten Response Time. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 2, 2013.
October 1, 2013	991	REPLY to Response to Motion re 987 MOTION to Strike 986 Response in Support of Motion (Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) (Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Show Cause Reply) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
September 27, 2013	990	RESPONSE in Opposition re 987 MOTION to Strike 986 Response in Support of Motion (Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Schultz, Donald)
September 13, 2013	989	Declaration re 988 Memorandum in Support, (Declaration of Stephen E. Noona in Support of Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
September 13, 2013	988	Memorandum in Support re 987 MOTION to Strike 986 Response in Support of Motion (Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) (Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
September 13, 2013	987	MOTION to Strike 986 Response in Support of Motion (Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
September 12, 2013	986	RESPONSE in Support re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER and Request for Hearing filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
September 4, 2013	985	Declaration re 982 Opposition,, (Declaration of Roseanne Eff in Support of Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Defendants To Show Cause ) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
September 4, 2013	984	Declaration re 982 Opposition,, (Declaration of Kristin Zmrhal in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plainitiff's Motion For Defendants to Show Cause) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
September 4, 2013	983	Declaration re 982 Opposition,, (Declaration of Antonio Sistos) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)
September 4, 2013	982	Opposition to 981 MOTION SHORTEN DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO I/P ENGINES MOTION re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER , 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER (Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Motion For Defendants To Show Cause Under Rule 37 For Noncompliance With August 13, 2013 Order) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
August 29, 2013	981	MOTION SHORTEN DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO I/P ENGINES MOTION re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 29, 2013	980	Declaration re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER OF CHARLES J. MONTERIO, JR. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 29, 2013	979	Memorandum in Support re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 29, 2013	978	MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 27, 2013	977	SEALED EXHIBIT B re 975 Declaration Declaration Of Margaret P. Kammerud by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation filed under seal. (rsim, )
August 27, 2013	976	SEALED EXHIBIT 1 re 974 Declaration of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation filed under seal. (rsim, )
August 26, 2013	975	Declaration re 973 Opposition, Declaration Of Margaret P. Kammerud In Support Of Defendants Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B (Public Version))(Noona, Stephen)
August 26, 2013	974	Declaration re 973 Opposition, Declaration Of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D. In Support Of Defendants' Response To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest, and Post-Judgment Interest by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Public Version), # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Noona, Stephen)
August 26, 2013	973	Opposition to 968 NOTICE, Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
August 26, 2013	972	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 970 MOTION to Seal (1) Exhibit 1 To The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest; and (2) Exhibi (Noona, Stephen)
August 26, 2013	971	Memorandum in Support re 970 MOTION to Seal (1) Exhibit 1 To The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest; and (2) Exhibi filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
August 26, 2013	970	MOTION to Seal (1) Exhibit 1 To The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest; and (2) Exhibit B To The Declaration Of Margaret P. Kammerud In Support Thereof by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
August 21, 2013	969	Sealed Documents re 968 NOTICE,. (Attachments: # 1 Letter, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(ldab, )
August 21, 2013	968	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 960 Memorandum Opinion,, of Plaintiff's Calculation of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 21, 2013	967	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 965 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest And Post-Judgment Interest (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 21, 2013	966	Memorandum in Support re 965 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest And Post-Judgment Interest filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 21, 2013	965	MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest And Post-Judgment Interest by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 16, 2013	964	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation Notice of Compliance (Noona, Stephen)
August 14, 2013	963	MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and deferring in part 822 Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties. Within 5 days of completing the aforementioned discovery and briefing schedule, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and to negotiate an appropriate ongoingroyalty rate, using 20.9% of U.S. AdWords revenues as the appropriate royalty base; if the parties are unable to come to an agreement, the Court Orders the parties to schedule a settlement conference with the United States Magistrate Judge assigned to this case no later than December 1, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/13/2013 and filed on 8/14/2013. (rsim, )
August 8, 2013	962	RESPONSE in Support re 958 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
August 2, 2013	961	Opposition to 958 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
August 1, 2013	960	MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that I/P Engine is entitled to supplemental damages for October 1, 2012 to November 20, 2012, in an amount to be determined, prejudgment interest in an amount to be determined from September 15, 2011 to November 20, 2012, and post-judgment interest for Defendants' infringement in an amount to be determined. Accordingly, I/P Engine's 792 motion is GRANTED; that the defendants are to provide an accounting of revenue for the accused products through the date of judgment, November 20, 2012, WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. (See Order for further specifics). Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 8/1/2013. (rsim, )
July 31, 2013	959	Memorandum in Support re 958 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
July 31, 2013	958	MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
June 21, 2013	957	REPLY to Response to Motion re 954 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Evidence filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
June 17, 2013	956	Opposition to 954 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Evidence filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
June 4, 2013	955	Memorandum in Support re 954 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Evidence filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
June 4, 2013	954	MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Evidence by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Noona, Stephen)
May 24, 2013	953	RESPONSE in Support re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Corrected Reply filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
May 24, 2013	952	ORDER granting 951 Motion for Leave to File; granting plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. leave of Court to file its corrected Reply in Support of its Motion for an Award for Post-Judgment Royalties. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 5/24/13. (mwin, )
May 23, 2013	951	MOTION for Leave to File Corrected Reply in Support of its Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Reply in Support of its Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Schultz, Donald)
May 21, 2013		Notice of Correction re 950 Declaration: (1) Counsel's signature does not include the required nine-element signature block. (2) The heading of the document indicates the wrong division. Counsel is advised that in all future filings, the full nine-element signature block is required, and the correct division should be indicated on the document. (mwin, )
May 20, 2013	950	Declaration re 949 Response in Support of Motion of Dr. Stephen L. Becker, Ph.D. Regarding Ongoing Royalties by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
May 20, 2013	949	RESPONSE in Support re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
May 14, 2013	948	SEALED Documents: Sealed version of Exhibits 10-21 to 942 Declaration of Margaret Kammerud in Support of Opposition to Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties; filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 10, # 2 Exhibit 11, # 3 Exhibit 12, # 4 Exhibit 13, # 5 Exhibit 14, # 6 Exhibit 15, # 7 Exhibit 16, # 8 Exhibit 17, # 9 Exhibit 18, # 10 Exhibit 19, # 11 Exhibit 20, # 12 Exhibit 21)(mwin, )
May 14, 2013	947	SEALED Documents: Sealed version of Exhibits 2-9 to the 942 Declaration of Margaret Kammerud in Support of Opposition to Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties; filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2, # 2 Exhibit 3, # 3 Exhibit 4, # 4 Exhibit 5, # 5 Exhibit 6, # 6 Exhibit 7, # 7 Exhibit 8, # 8 Exhibit 9)(mwin, )
May 14, 2013	946	SEALED Document: Sealed version of Declaration of Keith Ugone, Ph.D, in support of 938 Memorandum in Opposition by defendants; filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )
May 14, 2013	945	SEALED Document: Sealed version of Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow in support of 938 Memorandum in Opposition by defendants; filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )
May 14, 2013	944	SEALED Document: Sealed version of Defendants' Opposition to 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties, filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )
May 14, 2013	943	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 936 MOTION to Seal (Noona, Stephen)
May 14, 2013		Notice of Correction re 936 MOTION to Seal: The title of the document was shown twice ("MOTION to Seal motion to seal"). The clerk edited the entry to remove the duplicate language.(mwin, )
May 13, 2013	942	Declaration re 938 Memorandum in Opposition, by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2 (Public Version), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Public Version), # 4 Exhibit 4 (Public Version), # 5 Exhibit 5 (Public Version), # 6 Exhibit 6 (Public Version), # 7 Exhibit 7 (Public Version), # 8 Exhibit 8 (Public Version), # 9 Exhibit 9 (Public Version), # 10 Exhibit 10 (Public Version), # 11 Exhibit 11 (Public Version), # 12 Exhibit 12 (Public Version), # 13 Exhibit 13 (Public Version), # 14 Exhibit 14 (Public Version), # 15 Exhibit 15 (Public Version), # 16 Exhibit 16 (Public Version), # 17 Exhibit 17 (Public Version), # 18 Exhibit 18 (Public Version), # 19 Exhibit 19 (Public Version), # 20 Exhibit 20 (Public Version), # 21 Exhibit 21 (Public Version), # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30)(Noona, Stephen)
May 13, 2013	941	Declaration re 938 Memorandum in Opposition, (of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties)(Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
May 13, 2013	940	Declaration re 938 Memorandum in Opposition, (of Bartholomew Furrow In Support Of Defendants Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties)(Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
May 13, 2013	939	Declaration re 938 Memorandum in Opposition, (Declaration of Brian Keuthe in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plainitff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
May 13, 2013	938	Memorandum in Opposition re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties (Defendants Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties)(Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
May 13, 2013	937	Memorandum in Support re 936 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties, (2) Portions Of The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition, (3) Certain Exhibits To filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen) Modified on 5/14/2013 to remove duplicate language by changing "MOTION to Seal motion to seal" to "MOTION to Seal." (mwin, )
May 13, 2013	936	MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties, (2) Portions Of The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition, (3) Certain Exhibits To The Declaration Of Margaret Kammerud In Support Of Defendants Opposition, and (4) Portions Of The Declaration Of Bartholomew Furrow In Support Of Defendants Opposition by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen) Modified on 5/14/2013 to remove duplicate language by changing "MOTION to Seal motion to seal" to "MOTION to Seal."(mwin, )
May 1, 2013	935	ORDER denying 923 Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Beckerand for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-judgment Royalties; directing defendants to respond to plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties within ten days of entry of this order; permitting plaintiff to file a reply within five days of defendants' response. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 5/1/13. (mwin, )
April 22, 2013	934	Opposition to 923 MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
April 17, 2013	933	TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, (Noona, Stephen)
April 17, 2013	932	STIPULATION - See Attached Document for Specifics. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/17/2013. (bnew)
April 17, 2013	931	TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by I/P Engine, Inc. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
April 17, 2013	930	ORDER re 923 MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 923) WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS of the entry of this Order. Defendants shall forego filing a Reply brief in support of their motion. Briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 822) is hereby SUSPENDED until the Court rules on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties. The Court will provide additional instructions regarding briefing schedule of Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties upon resolution of Defendants renewed motion. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/17/2013. (bnew)
April 17, 2013	929	Declaration re 928 Reply to Response to Motion, (Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Expediting the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
April 17, 2013	928	REPLY to Response to Motion re 926 MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
April 16, 2013	927	Opposition to 926 MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
April 16, 2013	926	MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)
April 16, 2013	925	Declaration re 924 Memorandum in Support, (Declaration of David Perlson in Support of Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)
April 16, 2013	924	Memorandum in Support re 923 MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
April 16, 2013	923	MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)
April 9, 2013	922	Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 13-1313 for cross-appeal, 914 Notice of Appeal filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. (mwin, )
April 5, 2013	921	ORDER granting 913 Motion for Joseph R. Re to appear Pro hac vice for I/P Engine, Inc. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/5/13. (mwin, )
April 5, 2013	920	AMENDED ORDER Regarding Parties' Joint Response to the Court's Order Regarding Outstanding Motions to Seal Case Documents, amending 911 Order as outlined. (See Order for specifics.) Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/4/13; filed 4/5/13. (mwin, )
April 5, 2013	919	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 11-06-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 5/6/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/5/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/5/2013.(borden, sharon)
April 5, 2013	918	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 11-05-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 5/6/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/5/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/5/2013.(borden, sharon)
April 5, 2013	917	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 11-02-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 5/6/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/5/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/5/2013.(borden, sharon)
April 5, 2013	916	Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Federal Circuit re 914 Notice of Appeal. (mwin, )
April 4, 2013	915	Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 13-1307 for 910 Notice of Appeal filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 caption notice)(mwin, )
April 4, 2013	914	NOTICE OF APPEAL by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 0422-3464587. (Noona, Stephen)
April 4, 2013	913	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Joseph R. Re and Certification of Local Counsel W. Ryan Snow Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3463977. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)
April 4, 2013	912	Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Federal Circuit re 910 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 party and attorney list)(mwin, )
April 3, 2013	911	ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' JOINT RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING MOTIONS TO SEAL CASE DOCUMENTS deeming certain motions moot; granting certain motions; denying certain motions; granting certain motions as to the lesser redacted materials. (See order for specifics.) Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/3/13. (mwin, )
April 3, 2013	910	NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 800 Memorandum Opinion, 884 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 908 Order on Motion for New Trial by I/P Engine, Inc.. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 0422-3463041. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
April 3, 2013	909	ORDER directing Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties within 15 days of the entry of this Order; permitting Plaintiff to file a reply to Defendants' response within 7 days. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/3/13. (mwin, )
April 2, 2013	908	ORDER denying Plaintiff's 825 Motion for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/2/13. (mwin, )
April 2, 2013	907	ORDER denying Defendants' 833 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Damages or New Trial. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/2/13. (mwin, )
April 2, 2013	906	ORDER denying Defendants' 831 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/2/13. (mwin, )
April 2, 2013	905	ORDER denying Defendants' 820 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/2/13. (mwin, )
April 2, 2013	904	ORDER granting 900 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on April 1, 2013.
March 18, 2013	903	RESPONSE in Support re 900 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
March 11, 2013	902	Opposition to 900 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
March 1, 2013	901	Memorandum in Support re 900 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)
March 1, 2013	900	MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Snow, W. Ryan)
February 28, 2013		Notice of Correction re 899 NOTICE (of Supplemental Authority): Leave of court is required for filing of supplemental authority, pursuant to Local Rule 7(F)(1). (mwin, )
February 28, 2013	899	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 871 Opposition, Notice of Supplemental Authority (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit VirnetX Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
February 19, 2013	898	Response to 886 Order,,, (Parties' Joint Response to the Court's Order Regarding Outstanding Motions to Seal Case Documents) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
February 15, 2013	897	Declaration re 896 Response in Support of Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
February 15, 2013	896	RESPONSE in Support re 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
February 15, 2013	895	Declaration re 894 Reply to Response to Motion, 893 Reply to Motion, 892 Reply to Motion, (Declaration Of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Reply Briefs In Support Of Defendants Renewed Motions For Judgment As A Matter Of Law) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)
February 15, 2013	894	REPLY to Response to Motion re 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
February 15, 2013	893	Reply to Motion re 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
February 15, 2013	892	Reply to Motion re 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
February 12, 2013	891	ORDER granting in part and denied in part 888 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Counsel shall file a response no later than February 19, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on February 12, 2013.
February 12, 2013	890	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 889 NOTICE of Corrected Continued Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Bill of Costs (Noona, Stephen)
February 12, 2013	889	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Suffolk Technologies, LLC, Target Corporation re 887 Bill of Costs of Continued Opposition to Plaintifif's Amended Bill of Costs (Noona, Stephen)
February 12, 2013	888	Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 886 Order,,, (Joint Motion and Memorandum In Support Of Joint Motion For an Extension Of Time To Respond To The Courts Order on Outstanding Motions To Seal) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
February 7, 2013	886	ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING MOTIONS TO SEAL CASE DOCUMENTS - WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS of the entry of this order, the Court ORDERS the parties to undertake an assessment of outstanding motions to seal case records and provide the namesand document numbers of motions to seal that are now moot, withdrawn, or that should otherwise be dismissed. The Court ORDERS the parties to submit a proposed order disposing of any outstanding motions to seal that are moot, withdrawn, or otherwise should be dismissed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties affirmatively identify, by name and document number, which outstanding motions to seal should still be resolved by the Court. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 2/6/13 and filed on 2/7/13. (jcow, )
February 5, 2013	885	ORDER finding as moot 859 Motion to Expedite. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller on 2/5/2013. (Miller, Tommy)
February 4, 2013		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller: 859 MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite Briefing on Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker. (mwin, )
February 4, 2013		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller: 828 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of Defendants' Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law. (mwin, )
January 31, 2013	884	ORDER denying 835 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment under Rule 52(b) and a New Trial under Rule 59 on Laches. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 1/31/13. (mwin, )
January 30, 2013	883	AGREED ORDER granting 879 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; ORDERED that Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 may exceed the page limit specified inLocal Rule 7(F)(3) as filed in their current form on January 25, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/29/13 and filed on 1/30/13. (jcow, )
January 29, 2013	882	Withdrawal of Motion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 856 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker (Without Prejudice) (Noona, Stephen)
January 29, 2013	881	Sealed Document - Opposition Memorandum, re 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial. (jcow, )
January 28, 2013	880	Memorandum in Support re 879 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages as to Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)
January 28, 2013	879	MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages as to Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Snow, W. Ryan)
January 28, 2013	878	SEALED Document: Sealed Exhibit 2 to 870 Declaration; filed under seal pursuant to 866 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )
January 28, 2013	877	SEALED Document: Defendants' Sealed version of Memorandum in Opposition to plaintiff's 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages; filed under seal pursuant to 866 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )
January 28, 2013		Notice of Correction re 876 Opposition, this document contains excess pages. The filing user has been notified to file a motion for leave of court to properly file this document. (jcow, )
January 28, 2013		Notice of Correction re 872 Opposition, this document contains excess pages. The filing user has been notified that leave of court is required to properly file this document. (jcow, )
January 28, 2013		Notice of Correction re 871 Opposition, this document contains excess pages. The filing user has been notified that a motion for leave of court is required to properly file this document. (jcow, )
January 25, 2013	876	Opposition to 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
January 25, 2013	875	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 873 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Opposition to Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement or New Trial (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
January 25, 2013	874	Memorandum in Support re 873 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Opposition to Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement or New Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
January 25, 2013	873	MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Opposition to Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement or New Trial by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
January 25, 2013	872	Opposition to 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
January 25, 2013	871	Opposition to 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
January 25, 2013	870	Declaration re 869 Memorandum in Opposition (of Margaret P. Kammerud) in Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)
January 25, 2013	869	Memorandum in Opposition re 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
January 25, 2013	868	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 866 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Damages and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud Filed in Support Thereof (Noona, Stephen)
January 25, 2013	867	Memorandum in Support re 866 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Damages and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud Filed in Support Thereof filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
January 25, 2013	866	MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Damages and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud Filed in Support Thereof by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
January 25, 2013		Notice of Correction re 863 Opposition: The clerk edited the entry to add all filers stated in the document. (mwin, )
January 25, 2013	865	Declaration re 863 Opposition (of Dave Nelson) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial Under Rule 59 on Laches by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Noona, Stephen)
January 25, 2013	864	Declaration re 863 Opposition (of Jennifer Polse) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial Under Rule 59 on Laches by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
January 25, 2013	863	Opposition to 835 MOTION for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59 filed by IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc. . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen) Modified on 1/25/2013 to add filers as stated in the document.(mwin, )
January 25, 2013	862	Declaration re 861 Reply Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. In Support of I/P Engine Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Bill of Costs by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
January 25, 2013	861	Reply to 809 Bill of Costs I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Bill of Costs filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
January 23, 2013	860	ORDER granting 847 Motion to postpone briefing and ruling; The parties' briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 822) and the Court's consideration of said motion shall be postponed until after the Court rules on the parties' post-trial motions currently pending before the Court under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50, 52, and 59. The Court will provide further guidance on the revised briefing schedule for Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties as necessary after the Court completes its consideration of the other relevant post-trial motions. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 1/23/13. (jcow, )
January 16, 2013	859	MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite Briefing on Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
January 16, 2013	858	Declaration re 857 Memorandum in Support (of Stephen E. Noona) in Support of Defendants' Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)
January 16, 2013	857	Memorandum in Support re 856 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
January 16, 2013	856	MOTION to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
January 11, 2013	855	Declaration re 854 Opposition (of Sarah Agudo) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Bill of Costs by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Noona, Stephen)
January 11, 2013	854	Opposition to 809 Bill of Costs filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
January 3, 2013	853	REPLY to Response to Motion re 847 MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
December 31, 2012	852	Opposition to 847 MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 24, 2012	851	ORDER granting 849 Joint Motion to Expedite Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Postpone Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 24, 2012.
December 24, 2012	850	ORDER granting 846 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 24, 2012.
December 21, 2012	849	Joint MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Expedite Briefing On Defendants Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 21, 2012	848	Memorandum in Support re 847 MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)
December 21, 2012	847	MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 21, 2012	846	Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages, 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial, 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties, 835 MOTION for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59, 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial, 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 19, 2012	845	Sealed Document - Exhibit 1 to thet declaration in Joshua L. Sohn in support of defendants' renewed motions for judgment as a matter of law on damages, invalidity, and non-infringement or new trial (836). (jcow, )
December 19, 2012	844	Sealed Document - Memorandum in support of defendants' renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law on damages or new trial (834). (jcow, )
December 19, 2012	843	Sealed Document - Memorandum in support of defendants' renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law on non-infringement or new trial (832). (jcow, )
December 18, 2012	842	Declaration re 837 Memorandum in Support, of W. Ryan Snow by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	841	Declaration re 837 Memorandum in Support, of Kenneth Brothers by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	840	Declaration re 837 Memorandum in Support, of Jeffrey K. Sherwood by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	839	Declaration re 837 Memorandum in Support, of Dawn Rudenko by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	838	Request for Hearing by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial, 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial, 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial (Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	837	Memorandum in Support re 835 MOTION for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	836	Declaration re 821 Memorandum in Support, 832 Memorandum in Support, 834 Memorandum in Support, Declaration Of Joshua L. Sohn In Support Of Defendants Renewed Motions For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages, Invalidity, And Non-Infringement Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	835	MOTION for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	834	Memorandum in Support re 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	833	MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	832	Memorandum in Support re 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	831	MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	830	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 828 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On (Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	829	Memorandum in Support re 828 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	828	MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or New Trial; And (3) Certain Exhibit To The Declaration Of Joshua L. Sohn In Support Of Defendants Renewed Motions For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages, Invalidity And Non-Infringement Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	827	Declaration re 826 Memorandum in Support of Jeffrey K. Sherwood by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit PDX442 and PDX443)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	826	Memorandum in Support re 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	825	MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	824	Declaration re 823 Memorandum in Support of Stephen L. Becker by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	823	Memorandum in Support re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	822	MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 18, 2012	821	Memorandum in Support re 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	820	MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 18, 2012	819	AGREED ORDER granting 817 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; the Defendants shall have through and including January 11, 2013 in which to file their Response to Plaintiffs Bill of Costs. In addition, Plaintiff willhave through and including January 25, 2013, to file its reply in support of its Bill of Costs. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/17/12 and filed on 12/18/12. (jcow, )
December 17, 2012	817	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 809 Bill of Costs (Unopposed) and Memorandum in Support of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Bill of Costs by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
December 13, 2012	816	Request for Hearing by Google Inc. re 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record (Noona, Stephen)
December 13, 2012	815	REPLY to Response to Motion re 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record filed by Google Inc.. (Noona, Stephen)
December 7, 2012	814	Declaration re 813 Reply to Response to Motion of Stephen L. Becker, Ph.D. In Further Support Of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.S Motion For An Award Of Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest And Damages For Defendants Continuing Infringement by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 7, 2012	813	REPLY to Response to Motion re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 5, 2012	812	Opposition to 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 5, 2012	811	AGREED ORDER granting 808 Motion to Stay execution of judgmetn pending disposition of a motion - ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion To Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Disposition of a Motion is granted, and any proceedings to execute on or enforce the Final Judgment against Defendants shall be stayed pending resolution of any post-judgment motions timely filed in this case, and for 14 days thereafter. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 12/5/12. (jcow, )
December 3, 2012	810	Declaration re 809 Bill of Costs of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 3, 2012	809	BILL OF COSTS by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
December 3, 2012	808	MOTION to Stay (Unopposed) and Memorandum in Support of Unopposed Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Disposition of a Motion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
November 29, 2012	807	Declaration re 805 Opposition,, Declaration of Sarah Agudo in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest, and Supplemental Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Noona, Stephen)
November 29, 2012	806	Declaration re 805 Opposition,, Declaration of Keith R. Ugone, PhD. in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Award pf Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest and Supplemental Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)
November 29, 2012	805	Opposition to 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT, 791 NOTICE Defendants Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For An Award Of Prejudgment Interest, Defendants Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For An Award Of Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest and Supplemental Damages filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
November 21, 2012	804	NOTICE by Google Inc. re 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record and of Intent to Request Redaction (Noona, Stephen)
November 21, 2012	803	Memorandum in Support re 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record filed by Google Inc.. (Noona, Stephen)
November 21, 2012	802	MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
November 20, 2012	801	CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc., recover of defendant, Google, Inc., the sum of Fifteen Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($15,800,000.00). The Running Royalty Rate is 3.5%.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc., recover of defendant AOL, Inc., the sum of Seven Million Nine Hundred Forty-Three ThousandDollars and 00/100 ($7,943,000.00).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc., recover of defendant IAC Search &Media, Inc., the sum of Six Million Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 $6,650,000.00).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. recover of defendant Gannett Co., Inc., the sum of Four Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-TwoDollars and 00/100 ($4,322.00).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc., recover of defendant Target Corp., the sum of Ninety-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Three Dollars and 00/100 ($98,833.00) Form of judgment approved in accordance with Rule 58, FRCivP, July 20,2012. Entered and filed 11/20/12. (Signed by Patrice L. Thompson, Deputy Clerk, on 11/20/12). (ecav)
November 20, 2012	800	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: As outlined in this Memorandum Opinion and Order, a presumption of laches arises in this case, which I/P Engine was unable to rebut. Therefore, I/P Engine is barred from recovering damages from any of the defendants for any infringement occurring before September 15,2011. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 11/20/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/20/12). (ecav, )
November 20, 2012	799	MEMORANDUM ORDER: Having considered the Jury's determinations, the Court finds that the Defendants have failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the '420 Patent or the '664 Patent are obvious. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 11/20/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/20/12). (ecav, )
November 20, 2012	798	ORDER GRANTING 797 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT, 791 NOTICE OF CALCULATION Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT, 791 NOTICE OF CALCULATION. Defendants shall have through and including 11/29/2012 for Responses and Plaintiff shall have through and including 12/7/2012. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 11/20/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/20/12). (ecav, )
November 19, 2012	797	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT, 791 NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
November 13, 2012	796	JURY MEAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/6/12 & filed on 11/7/12. (ptom)
November 9, 2012	795	Declaration re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT of Dawn Rudenko, Esq. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 9, 2012	794	Declaration re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT of Stephen L. Becker, PHD. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 9, 2012	793	Memorandum in Support re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 9, 2012	792	MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 7, 2012	791	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Calculation of Prejudgment Interest (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
November 6, 2012	790	Sealed Document (E-gov Jury Verdict). (ptom) Modified on 11/8/2012 (ptom).
November 6, 2012	789	JURY VERDICT (Redacted). (ptom)
November 6, 2012	788	JURY TRIAL (DAY #15) completed on 11/6/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Frank Ciminio, Jr., W. Ryan Snow, Donald Schultz, and Charles Monterio appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 11/5/12. Court excused jurors to continue their deliberations at 10:04am. Out of the presence of the jury, court and counsel answered questions of the jury. Court ordered jury sequestered for lunch. Jury later returned with a verdict which was read into the record. Jurors excused. Court directed counsel to file any motions in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. Judgment will issue once the Court makes a ruling on obviousness. Court adjourned. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit List, # 2 Witness List) (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom) (Main Document 788 replaced on 11/7/2012) (ptom, ). Modified on 11/7/2012 to add language re: judgment(ptom, ).
November 5, 2012	787	JURY TRIAL (DAY #14) held on 11/5/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Frank Cimino, Jr. Charles Monterio, and W. Ryan Snow, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last Friday 11/2/12. Court excused jurors to continue their deliberations at 9:58am. Outside of the presence of the jury, Court and counsel discussed and answered questions of the jury. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Tuesday, 11/6/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 11/6/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom)
November 5, 2012	786	JURY MEAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/5/12. (ptom)
November 2, 2012	785	JURY MEAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson & filed on 11/2/12. (ptom)
November 2, 2012	784	JURY TRIAL (DAY #13) held on 11/2/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Frank Cimino, Jr., Dawn Rudenko, Charles Monterio, and Donald Schultz, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Robert Wilson, Joshua Sohn, Emily OBrien and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 11/1/12. Court excused jurors to continue their deliberations at 9:43am. Outside of the presence of the jury, Court and counsel discussed and answered questions of the jury. Court ORDERED Jurors sequestered for lunch. Jurors excused and Court adjourned to Monday November 5, 2012 at 10:00am. Jury Trial continued to 11/5/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom)
November 2, 2012	783	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation of Lodging of Demonstratives (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I)(Noona, Stephen)
November 2, 2012	781	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 11-01-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 12/3/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/2/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/31/2013.(borden, sharon) (Main Document 781 replaced on 11/2/2012) (arou, ).
November 1, 2012	782	JURY MEAL ORDER.. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/1/12. (ptom)
November 1, 2012	780	JURY TRIAL (DAY #12) held on 11/1/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Frank Cimino, Jr., Dawn Rudenko, Charles Monterio, and Donald Schultz, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Robert Wilson, Joshua Sohn, Emily OBrien and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Out of the presence of the jury, Court conducted a charge conference off the record. Objections heard on the record. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/31/12. Out of the presence of the jury, Court finds the co-defendants will benefit from Courts previous ruling on Laches. Closing Arguments heard. Court ORDERED Jurors sequestered for lunch. Jury received Courts charge and instructions. Court excused jurors to begin their deliberations at 4:10pm. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Friday, 11/2/12 at 9:30 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 11/2/2012 at 09:30 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom)
November 1, 2012	776	Memorandum in Support re 775 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
November 1, 2012	775	MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
November 1, 2012	774	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-31-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 12/3/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/2/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/30/2013.(borden, sharon) (Main Document 774 replaced on 11/2/2012) (arou, ).
November 1, 2012	773	Memorandum in Support re 772 Second MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Damages filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
November 1, 2012	772	Second MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
November 1, 2012	771	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. Proffer of Evidence Related to Laches (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 PX 176, # 10 PX 408, # 11 PX 409, # 12 PX 410, # 13 PX 411, # 14 PX 412, # 15 PX 413, # 16 PX 414, # 17 PX 415, # 18 PX 416, # 19 PX 417 I, # 20 PX 417 II, # 21 PX 418, # 22 PX 419 I, # 23 PX 419 II, # 24 PX 421, # 25 DX 21, # 26 DX28, # 27 DX 255)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 31, 2012	770	JURY TRIAL (DAY #11) held on 10/31/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Frank Cimino, Jr., and Donald Schultz, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Robert Wilson, Joshua Sohn, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Out of the presence of the jury, Court GRANTS IN PARTS AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs JMOL as to Validity. Court GRANTS Defendants Renewed JMOL of Laches stating findings and rulings on the record. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/30/12. Plaintiff presented rebuttal evidence - witness sworn and testified. Plaintiffs exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Jurors excused until Thursday, 11/1/12 at 10:30 a.m. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendants Motions for a Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Invalidity, as to Non-Infringement, and as to Damages - Argued - Court DENIES JMOLs as to Invalidity and Non-Infringement. Court adjourned until Thursday, 11/1/12 at 9:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 11/1/2012 at 10:30 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom, ) Modified on 11/1/2012 to correct last appearance or jurors(ptom). (Main Document 770 replaced on 11/1/2012) (ptom, ).
October 31, 2012		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 706 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Exhibit 1 To The OBrien Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Portions Of Dr. Frieders Second Updated Expert Report. (ecav, )
October 31, 2012	769	Opposition to Plaintiff's (Oral) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Anticipation and Obviousness filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 31, 2012	768	Memorandum in Support re 767 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law Of Laches filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 31, 2012	767	MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law Of Laches by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2012	766	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation of Filing of Defendants Proffer Of Evidence Related To Laches (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2012	765	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-30-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 30, 2012	764	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 10, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/30/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(stewart, jody)
October 30, 2012	763	JURY TRIAL (DAY #10) held on 10/30/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Dawn Rudenko, and W. Ryan Snow, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Emily OBrien, Robert Wilson, Joshua Sohn, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last Friday 10/26/12. Defendants continued presentation of evidence - witness testified. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Out of the presence of the jury, Court GRANTED Defendants #748 MOTION to Exclude And Preclude Plaintiff From Recalling Mr. Kosak As A Rebuttal Witness, stating ruling on the record. Defendants rest. Jurors excused until Wednesday, 10/31/12 at 10:00 a.m. Out of the presence of the jury, Plaintiffs Motions for a Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Validity, as to Damages, and as to Latches - Argued - Court takes matter under advisement. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendants Renewed their Motion for a Judgment as a Matter of Law.Court adjourned until Wednesday, 10/31/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/31/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom)
October 30, 2012	762	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-26-2012 (Morning Session Public Portion), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 30, 2012	761	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-25-2012 (Morning Session Public Portion), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 30, 2012	760	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-24-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 30, 2012	759	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-23-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 30, 2012	758	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-22-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 30, 2012	757	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-19-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 30, 2012	756	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 9, afternoon session, for dates of 10/26/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(stewart, jody)
October 30, 2012	755	Declaration re 754 Memorandum in Support of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2012	754	Memorandum in Support re 753 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Non-Infringement filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2012	753	MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Non-Infringement by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2012	752	Memorandum in Support re 751 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Damages filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2012	751	MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2012	750	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Plaintiff's Proffer Regarding Proposed Rebuttal Testimony of Donald Kosak (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 30, 2012	749	Brief in Support to 748 MOTION to Exclude And Preclude Plaintiff From Recalling Mr. Kosak As A Rebuttal Witness filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 30, 2012	748	MOTION to Exclude And Preclude Plaintiff From Recalling Mr. Kosak As A Rebuttal Witness by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 26, 2012	747	JURY TRIAL (DAY #9)held on 10/26/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Dawn Rudenko, W. Ryan Snow, Donald Schultz, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Emily OBrien, Robert Wilson, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/25/12. Court ORDERED courtroom sealed for proprietary testimony. Defendants continued presentation of evidence-witness sworn and testified. Defendants and Plaintiff exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Out of the presence of the jury, objections heard and rulings made on the record about certain exhibits and testimony. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Monday, 10/29/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/29/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom)
October 26, 2012	746	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 8, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/25/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/26/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/24/2013.(stewart, jody)
October 25, 2012	745	JURY TRIAL (DAY #8) held on 10/25/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Out of the presence of the jury, objections heard and rulings made on the record about certain exhibits and testimony. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/24/12. Court ORDERED courtroom sealed for proprietary testimony. Defendants continued presentation of evidence. Defendants exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Friday, 10/26/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/26/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 745 replaced on 10/26/2012) (ptom, ).
October 25, 2012	744	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 7, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/24/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/26/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/23/2013.(stewart, jody) (Main Document 744 replaced on 11/2/2012) (arou, ).
October 24, 2012	743	JURY TRIAL (DAY #7) held on 10/24/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Dawn Rudenko, Donald Schultz, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien, Stephen Noona, David Bilsker, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendants Motion to Strike Testimony of Dr. Becker - Argued - Court DENIES the Motion. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendant Motion to Strike Certain Testimony of Dr. Becker - Argued - Court to issue a curative jury instruction. Out of the presence of the jury, the Court heard objections to certain exhibits. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/23/12. Plaintiff read interrogatory into the record. Plaintiff rested. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendants Motion for a Judgment as a Matter of Law - Argued - Court DENIED the motion. Defendants presented evidence - witnesses sworn and testified. Plaintiffs Exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Thursday, 10/25/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/25/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 743 replaced on 10/25/2012) (ptom, ).
October 24, 2012	742	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 6, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/23/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/23/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)
October 24, 2012	741	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/22/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/23/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)
October 24, 2012	740	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Plaintiff's Proposed Curative Instructions (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 23, 2012	739	ORDER denying 709 Motion to Strike per ruling of October 17, 2012. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 23, 2012.
October 23, 2012	738	ORDER denying 700 Motion for Reconsideration per ruling on October 16, 2012. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 23, 2012.
October 23, 2012	737	ORDER finding as moot 701 Motion to Expedite per ruling on October 16,2012. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 23, 2012.
October 23, 2012	736	ORDER finding as moot 712 Motion to Expedite. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on october 23, 2012.
October 23, 2012	735	JURY TRIAL (DAY #6) held on 10/23/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Jury Trial set for 10/24/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Dawn Rudenko, and W. Ryan Snow appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, Robert Wilson, Emily OBrien, David Bilsker, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Matter came on for trial by jury (Day #6). Out of the presence of the jury, Pretrial conference held in chambers. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/22/12. Plaintiff continued presentation of evidence witnesses sworn and testified.Plaintiffs Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Court STRIKES testimony of Dr. Becker, on cross-examination, about purchase/sell agreement of the Disney/Google Patent, based on improper cross-examination on issue. Court to close Courtroom tomorrow, 10/24/12, from 2:30pm - 3:15pm for proprietary testimony. Juror excused and Court adjourned until Wednesday, 10/24/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury trial continued to 10/24/12 at 10:00am in Courtroom #4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson.[Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 735 replaced on 10/24/2012) (ptom). Modified on 10/24/2012 to add language (ptom).
October 23, 2012	734	ORDER granting 724 Motion for David Andrew Perlson to appear Pro hac vice on behalf of AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Entered and filed 10/23/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/23/12). (ecav, )
October 23, 2012		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 687 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Order on the Final Pretrial Conference, 684 MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 4 to its Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Target Corporation. (ecav, )
October 22, 2012	733	JURY TRIAL (DAY #5) held on 10/22/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien, Stephen Noona, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Out of the presence of the jury, Pretrial conference held in chambers. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last Friday, 10/19/12. Plaintiff continued presentation of evidence witnesses sworn and testified. Plaintiffs Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Tuesday, 10/23/12 at 9:30 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/23/2012 at 09:30 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 733 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, ).
October 22, 2012	732	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 3, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/18/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/21/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)
October 22, 2012	731	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 2, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/17/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7074. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/21/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)
October 22, 2012	730	TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 1, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/16/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/21/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)
October 19, 2012	729	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-18-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/19/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/17/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 19, 2012	728	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-17-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/19/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/17/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 19, 2012	727	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-16-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/19/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/17/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 19, 2012	726	JURY TRIAL (DAY #4) held on 10/19/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Stephen Noona, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/18/12. Court ORDERED courtroom sealed for proprietary testimony. Plaintiff continued presentation of evidence witness testified. Plaintiffs Sealed Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Out of the presence of the jury, Court DENIES Defendants Motion to Strike. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Monday, 10/22/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/22/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom) (Main Document 726 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, ).
October 18, 2012	725	JURY TRIAL (DAY #3) held on 10/18/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Frank Cimino, Jr., Charles Monterio, and W. Ryan Snow appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/17/12. Out of the presence of the jury, pretrial conference held in chambers. Comments of Court and counsel re: sealing of courtroom for testimony on proprietary information. Public notice to be posted. Plaintiff continued presentation of evidence witnesses sworn and testified. Video deposition of Jon Diorio, Gary Holt and Bartholomew Furrow shown to the jury. Plaintiffs Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Court adjourned until Friday, 10/19/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/19/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.).)(ptom) Modified on 10/19/2012 to add pretrial conference (ptom). (Main Document 725 replaced on 10/19/2012) (ptom, ). (Main Document 725 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, )
October 18, 2012	724	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David Andrew Perlson and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3252387. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 18, 2012	723	ORDER granting 721 Motion for Pro hac vice, Appointed Jennifer Lynn Polse for AOL Inc., for Gannett Company, Inc., for Google Inc., for IAC Search & Media, Inc., for Target Corporation. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 10/18/12. (jcow, )
October 18, 2012		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal 1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes, 567 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1-3 (ecav, )
October 17, 2012	722	JURY TRIAL (DAY #2) held on 10/17/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, Dawn Rudenko, Donald Schultz, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien, Stephen Noona, David Bilsker, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/16/12. Plaintiff presented evidence witnesses sworn and testified. Plaintiffs and Defendants Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Video Deposition of Jonathan Alferness shown to the jury. Out of the presence of the jury, Court DENIED Plaintiffs #700 Motion for Reconsideration of 697 Order denying Motion for Sanctions; and DENIED Defendants #709 Motion to Strike and for Sanctions and to Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert report in Violation of the Courts Oct. 9th Order, stating rulings on the record. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Thursday, 10/18/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.).)(ptom) Modified on 10/18/2012 to add language(ptom). (Main Document 722 replaced on 10/18/2012) (ptom, ). (Main Document 722 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, ).
October 17, 2012	721	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer Lynn Polse and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3250881. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 17, 2012		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions;, 524 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 34 and 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judg, 514 MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 2 to its Response to Defendants Motion to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Materials at Trial, 508 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12. (ecav, )
October 16, 2012	720	(DAY #1) Jury Trial Begun and Voir Dire held on 10/16/12 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, Dawn Rudenko, Donald Schultz, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien, Stephen Noona, David Bilsker, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Pretrial conference held in chambers. Petit jurors were sworn, examined on voir dire and from said panel came a jury of nine (9) who were duly sworn. Jurors not selected excused subject to call. Jurors instructed by Court and shown a video as to patent cases. Out of the presence of the jury, counsel argued objections to demonstrative exhibits - Court stated rulings on the record. Witnesses sequestered. Opening statements of counsel heard. Court adjourned until Wednesday, 10/17/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/17/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 720 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, ).
October 16, 2012		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 453 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #5 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 436 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #1 along with Exhibits 5-6 and 11-12, 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone, 449 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #4 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 457 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker along with Exhibits 1-5, 7-8, and 10-11, 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to, 462 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants Motion to Preclude Dr. Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions along with Exhibits 1-3 and 5, 441 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #2 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 445 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #3 along with Exhibits 3-11. (ecav, )
October 15, 2012	719	ORDER ON FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/15/12. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(arou)
October 15, 2012	718	Sealed Document: Exhibit to 711 Declaration, filed by by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation UNDER SEAL, pursuant to 706 Motion to Seal. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter)(mwin, )
October 15, 2012	717	RESPONSE in Opposition re 709 Emergency MOTION to Strike and For Sanctions and To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of the Courts October 9 Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 15, 2012		MOTION REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to (rsim, )
October 15, 2012		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 453 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #5 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 436 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #1 along with Exhibits 5-6 and 11-12, 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone, 449 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #4 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 457 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker along with Exhibits 1-5, 7-8, and 10-11, 462 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants Motion to Preclude Dr. Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions along with Exhibits 1-3 and 5, 441 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #2 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 445 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #3 along with Exhibits 3-11 (rsim, )
October 15, 2012	716	Opposition to 700 MOTION for Reconsideration re 697 Order on Motion for Sanctions,,,,,,,,,,,,, denial of I/P Engines Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Judge Leonard's Ruling on Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 15, 2012	715	CERTIFICATE of Service (Amended) re 713 Reply to Motion, by Stephen Edward Noona on behalf of AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation (Noona, Stephen)
October 15, 2012	714	CERTIFICATE of Service (Amended) re 710 Memorandum in Support, by Stephen Edward Noona on behalf of AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation (Noona, Stephen)
October 15, 2012		Notice of Correction re 713 Reply to Motion - The filing user has been notified to file a separate Certificate of Service. The certificate of service filed is not signed. (rsim, )
October 15, 2012		Notice of Correction re 710 Memorandum in Support - The filing user has been notified to file a separate Certificate of Service. The certificate of service filed is not signed. (rsim, )
October 14, 2012	713	Reply to Motion re 701 MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for Review of Judge Leonards Ruling on I/P Engines Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 14, 2012	712	Consent MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Consent Motion to Expedite Briefing on Defendants Emergency Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of The Courts October 9 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 14, 2012	711	Declaration re 710 Memorandum in Support, of Emily O'Brien in Support of Defendants Emergency Motion For Sanctions and To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of the Courts October 9 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 14, 2012	710	Memorandum in Support re 709 Emergency MOTION to Strike and For Sanctions and To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of the Courts October 9 Order filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 14, 2012	709	Emergency MOTION to Strike and For Sanctions and To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of the Courts October 9 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 14, 2012	708	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 706 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Exhibit 1 To The OBrien Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Portions Of Dr. Frieders Second Updated Expert Report (Noona, Stephen)
October 14, 2012	707	Memorandum in Support re 706 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Exhibit 1 To The OBrien Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Portions Of Dr. Frieders Second Updated Expert Report filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 14, 2012	706	MOTION to Seal Portions Of Exhibit 1 To The OBrien Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Portions Of Dr. Frieders Second Updated Expert Report by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 12, 2012	705	ORDER NUMBER 2 - PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS: Before the Court are remaining motions to exclude evidence and witnesses from trial in the above-styled matter filed by both Plaintiff and Defendants. These matters have been fully briefed by the Parties. The Court finds that oral arguments of these motions will not aid itsdecisional process. Having reviewed the motions and related materials, the Court finds these matters ripe for judicial determination. For the reasons stated herein, and pursuant to the inherent authority to make evidentiary rulings prior to trial, see Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38,41 n.4(1984), the Court resolves the Parties' motions as outlined: Plaintiffs First Motion in Limine as to Items 2 and 6 is DEFERRED. The Court's reasoning with respect to the Lycos agreements is equally applicable to the seven agreements Defendants wish to offer, which by their own admission are non-comparable, and are again solely offered for the purpose of showing a preference by Google for lump sum royalty payments. Non-comparable licenses cannot be used to determine either the form or amount of a reasonable royalty. Accordingly, for the reasons outlined above and under the Court's discretion under Fed. R. Evid. 403, Plaintiffs Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements between Google and other third parties, as outlined in Plaintiffs memorandum in support of this motion, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Second Motion in Limine to exclude the Google-Meyer Agreement is DENIED. Additionally, the Court's reasoning with respect to the Google-Meyer Agreement is equally applicable to the Google-Disney Agreement. As there is a dispute to whether the technology underlying the Google-Disney Agreements is comparable, the jury must resolve the dispute in the context of determining a reasonable royalty for damages. Consequently, Plaintiffs Second Motion in Limine to exclude the Google-Disney Agreement is DENIED. Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone as to any testimony using a "yardstick" or "proxy" methodology or the use of the real estate valuations analogies in this context. Dr. Ugone is free to present expert opinion using established methods of calculating damages, including the hypothetical negotiation approach guided by the Georgia-Pacific Factors, which he purports to use. Having reviewed the motions and related pleadings, the Court finds that Dr. Ungars new theory of invalidity is not violative of Rule 26 procedures. Furthermore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has neither been surprised nor prejudiced by this new theory under Fourth Circuit precedent on this issue. See Southern States Rack & Fixture, Inc. v. Sherwm-Williams Co., 318 F.3d 592, 597 (4th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion as to Dr. Ungars' new theory of invalidity is DENIED. At Final-Pre Trial Conference, Defendants essentially asked for reconsideration of the Court's previous denial of their Motion in Limine No. 2. Having again reviewed the relevant case law, the Court declines to reconsider its decision. I/P Engine, through its damages expert, is prepared to offer evidence at trial that "patented technology forms a substantial basis of the consumer demand of the accused products" through discovered documents showing increased revenue specifically attributed to patented technologies, presumably reflecting increased consumer demand. The sufficiency of this evidence in determining a reasonable royalty is a question for the jury. If questions arise as to whether Dr. Becker's trial testimony adequately supports application of the Entire Market Value Rule, they can be addressed through cross examination or through relevant trial motions. Accordingly, motion for reconsideration of the Court's previous denial of their Motion in Limine No. 2 is DENIED. Having reviewed the motion and related pleadings, the Court finds that objections to Dr. Becker's testimony are best resolved at trial during the course of examination as they generally go to the weight of the evidence and should be resolved by the jury. In summary: Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Stephen L. Becker (ECF No. 319) is DENIED. DENYING 293 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 299 Motion in Limine; DENYING 319 Motion to Exclude; DENYING 327 Motion to Exclude; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 333 Motion in Limine; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 340 Motion to Exclude; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 357 Motion in Limine, as outlined in this Order. (See Order for entire Specifics) Entered and filed 10/12/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/12/12). (ecav, )
October 12, 2012	704	Defendants' Proposed Pre-Trial Jury Instructions Proposed Jury Instructions by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)
October 12, 2012		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua, 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof, 331 MOTION to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 312 MOTION to Seal Exhibit 3 to the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence, 338 MOTION to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (ecav, )
October 12, 2012		MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 425 MOTION to Seal its Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment along with Exhibits 8, 11-19, 22-24, 27-32, 34-39, 45, 53-54, 56. (ecav, )
October 11, 2012	703	REPLY to Response to Motion re 293 MOTION to Dismiss all Claims Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 11, 2012	702	TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-09-2012, before Judge Lawrence R. Leonard, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/13/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/11/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/9/2013.(borden, sharon)
October 11, 2012		Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller as directed. Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller no longer assigned to the case. (ecav, )
October 10, 2012	701	MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for Review of Judge Leonards Ruling on I/P Engines Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 10, 2012	700	MOTION for Reconsideration re 697 Order on Motion for Sanctions,,,,,,,,,,,,, denial of I/P Engines Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 10, 2012	699	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Filing of Plaintiff's Proposed Verdict Form (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Schultz, Donald)
October 9, 2012		Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller no longer assigned to the case. (ecav, )
October 9, 2012		Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard no longer assigned to the case. (ecav, )
October 9, 2012	698	ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to assign any matters which arise in this case to an alternate United States Magistrate Judge due to the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge having conducted a settlement conference and discussions in this matter. Because of the nature of the settlement discussions the undersigned cannot preside over any contested issues in this case. Entered and filed 10/9/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 10/9/12). (ecav, )
October 9, 2012	697	ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 277 Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses; AND DENYING its 282 Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses. Specifically, as to the Plaintiffs Second Motion, the Court ORDERS the Defendants to produce to the Plaintiff within two days of entry of this Order data that has not been produced as to Google, Inc.'s, revenues for its properties based in the United States and AUTHORIZES the Plaintiff to supplement the report of its damages expert, Dr. Stephen L. Becker, within two days thereafter. Furthermore, the Defendants may not cross-examine Dr. Becker on the omission in his initial report of Google, Inc.'s, revenues for its properties based in the United States. Although the Court DENIES the Plaintiff's Second Motion as to certain e-mails and information provided therein produced by the Defendants as Bates Nos. G-IPE-0888897,G-IPE-0888898-99, G-IPE-0888900, and G-IPE-888901-02, the Plaintiff is AUTHORIZED to supplement Dr. Becker's report to include these documents by Friday, October 12,2012. Finally, the Court DENIES the Plaintiffs Second Motion as to the Defendants' non-infringing alternatives contentions but AUTHORIZES the Plaintiff to supplement the report of its infringement expert, Dr. Ophir Frieder, to include these contentions by Friday, October 12, 2012. (See Order for All Specifics) Entered and filed 10/9/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 10/9/12). (ecav, )
October 9, 2012	696	Proposed Voir Dire by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)
October 9, 2012	695	Proposed Jury Instructions by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)
October 9, 2012		Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson:Final Pretrial Conference held on 10/9/2012. Attorney's Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, Dawn Rudenko and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. Attorney's David Nelson, David Pearlson, Emily O'Brien, Stephen Noona, David Bilsker, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of the defendant's. (ptom)
October 9, 2012	694	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation of Filing Defendants' Proposed Verdict Form (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 9, 2012	693	Defendants' Proposed Jury Instructions by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 9, 2012	692	Proposed Voir Dire by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 9, 2012	691	Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard:Motion Hearing held on 10/9/2012 re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc., 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. Present were Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, Frank Cimino, Jr. and Kenneth Brothers on behalf of the plaintiff and David Bilsker, David Perlson, Steve Noona and David Nelson on behalf of the defendants. Mr. Sherwood argues motion #277 and Mr. Bilsker responds. The Court makes rulings on the record. Mr. Cimino argues motion #282 and Mr. Perlson responds. The Court makes rulings on the record. The Court will enter an order in this matter. Parties adjourn to participate in a settlement conference with Judge Leonard in this case and a final pretrial conference later in the afternoon with Judge Jackson. Court adjourned. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(cdod, )
October 9, 2012		Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard:Settlement Conference held on 10/9/2012. (cdod, )
October 9, 2012	690	ORDER, AGREED, re. 202 Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice of I/P Engine's Claims Relating to AOL's Advertising.com Sponsored Listings by AOL, I/P Engine, Inc. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that I/P Engine's claims for relief against AOL relating to AOL's Advertising.com Sponsored Listings are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys' fees, costs of court and expenses relating to the dismissed claims shall be borne by each party incurring the same. Entered and filed 10/9/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/9/12). (ecav, )
October 8, 2012	689	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 687 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Order on the Final Pretrial Conference (Noona, Stephen)
October 8, 2012	688	Memorandum in Support re 687 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Order on the Final Pretrial Conference filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 8, 2012	687	MOTION to Seal Portions of the Order on the Final Pretrial Conference by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 5, 2012	686	Opposition to 293 MOTION to Dismiss all Claims Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 5, 2012	685	Memorandum in Support re 684 MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 4 to its Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Target Corporation filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 5, 2012	684	MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 4 to its Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Target Corporation by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 5, 2012	683	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Exhibits 1 and 4 to its Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Target Corporation (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 5, 2012	682	ORDER on three (3) Motions in Limine filed by I/P Engine, Inc. ("Plaintiff") toexclude evidence from trial in the above-styled matter. Also before the Court are five (5) Motions in Limine to exclude evidence filed by Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., Target Corporation, IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Gannett Co., Inc. ("Defendants"). These matters have been fully briefed by the Parties. The Court finds that oral arguments of these motions will not aid its decisional process. Having reviewed the motions and related materials, the Courtfinds these matters ripe for judicial determination. For the reasons stated herein, and pursuant to the inherent authority to make evidentiary rulings prior to trial, see Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38,41 n.4 (1984), the Court resolves the Parties' Motions in Limine as outlined: DEFERRING ruling on 299 Motion in Limine; DENYING 301 Motion in Limine; DEFERRING ruling on 303 Motion in Limine; DEFERRING ruling on 305 Motion in Limine; DENYING 307 Motion in Limine; GRANTING AND DEFERRING (See Order for specifics as to each item) 314 Motion in Limine; DEFERRING ruling on 333 Motion in Limine; DENYING 335 Motion in Limine, as outlined in this Order. (See Order for all Specifics as to each Motion in Limine) Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	681	ORDER granting 654 Motion for Pro hac vice appearance. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 5, 2012.
October 5, 2012	680	ORDER granting 672 Motion for Pro hac vice appearance. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 5, 2012.
October 5, 2012	679	ORDER GRANTING 582 Motion for David Leon Bilsker to appear asPro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	678	ORDER GRANTING 643 Motion for Margaret Pirnie Kammerud to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	677	ORDER GRANTING 642 Motion for Jennifer Jasmine Ghaussy to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	676	ORDER GRANTING 641 Motion for Howard Yeh-hao Chen to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	675	ORDER GRANTING 640 Motion for Antonio Ricardo Sistos to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	674	ORDER GRANTING 639 Motion for Joshua Lee Sohn to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	673	ORDER GRANTING 638 Motion for Sarah Agudo to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	672	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David Aaron Nelson and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3235417. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 5, 2012	671	Sealed Exhibit 2 re 651 Reply to Motion re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 2, # 2 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 2)(ecav, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/5/2012: # 3 Letter) (ecav, ).
October 5, 2012	670	Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply re 651 Reply to Motion re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	669	Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply re 651 Reply to Motion re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )
October 5, 2012	668	MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 5, 2012	667	NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 664 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations , Notice of Filing of Additional Exhibit to the Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
October 5, 2012	666	Declaration re 665 Memorandum in Support of Emily O'Brien in Support of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations by IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Noona, Stephen)
October 5, 2012	665	Memorandum in Support re 664 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 5, 2012	664	MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 5, 2012		Notice of Correction re 660 Stipulation. Counsel filed a pleading titled, "Stipulation and Proposed Order Withdrawing Certain Motions in Limine Pending before the Court". Proposed Orders have to be sent to the Clerk's Office in paper and not filed electronically as a pleading. If counsel's intent is to withdraw the motions that are stated in Doc. 660, a Motion to Withdraw is all that is needed, linking same back to the pertinent motions and the Stipulation is not necessary. (ecav, )
October 4, 2012	660	STIPULATION and Proposed Order Withdrawing Certain Motions in Limine Pending Before the Court by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 4, 2012	659	NOTICE of Appearance by Craig Crandall Reilly on behalf of Suffolk Technologies, LLC (Reilly, Craig)
October 4, 2012	658	Brief in Support to 657 Opposition filed by Suffolk Technologies, LLC. (Reilly, Craig)
October 4, 2012	657	Opposition to 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial filed by Suffolk Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Reilly, Craig)
October 4, 2012	656	Request for Hearing by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial (Noona, Stephen)
October 4, 2012	655	REPLY to Response to Motion re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 4, 2012	654	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Emily Christina O'Brien and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233922. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 4, 2012	651	Reply to Motion re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 4, 2012	649	Memorandum in Support re 647 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions along with Exhibits 1 and 2 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 4, 2012	647	MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions along with Exhibits 1 and 2 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 4, 2012	646	NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 4, 2012	644	Reply to Motion re 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 4, 2012	643	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Margaret Pirnie Kammerud and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233082. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 4, 2012	642	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer Jasmine Ghaussy and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233079. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 4, 2012	641	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Howard Yeh-hao Chen and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233062. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 4, 2012	640	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Antonio Ricardo Sistos and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233056. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 4, 2012	639	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua Lee Sohn and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233047. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 4, 2012	638	Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Sarah Agudo and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233036. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012	663	Sealed Defendants' Reply Brief in Support re 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(ecav, )
October 3, 2012	662	Sealed Exhibit 1 re 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes. (ecav, )
October 3, 2012	661	Sealed Defendants' Reply Brief in Support to Exclude Testimony re 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal 1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes. (ecav, )
October 3, 2012	653	Cover Letter re 652 Sealed Document, 645 Sealed Document, 648 Sealed Document, 650 Sealed Document. (ecav, )
October 3, 2012	652	Sealed Exhibit 3 re 569 Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )
October 3, 2012	650	Sealed Exhibit 2 re 569 Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )
October 3, 2012	648	Sealed Exhibit 1 re 569 Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (ecav, )
October 3, 2012	645	Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of Its Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone re 569 Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )
October 3, 2012	609	Reply to Motion re 357 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
October 3, 2012	608	Response to 115 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Seal Exhibits 15, 16, 17, 18, and 21 of IP Engine's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc.'s Custodial Document Production, 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 15 (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 16 (Lesser Redacted), # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 17 (Lesser Redacted), # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 18 (Unredacted, Public Form), # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 21 (Lesser Redacted), # 6 Exhibit ECF 125 (Lesser Redacted), # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 11 (Lesser Redacted), # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 12 (Lesser Redacted), # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 15 (Lesser Redacted), # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 22 (Lesser Redacted))(Schultz, Donald)
October 3, 2012	607	Response to 241 NOTICE,, 234 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration o Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 4 (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit 5 (Lesser Redacted), # 3 Exhibit 6 (Lesser Redacted), # 4 Exhibit 7 (Lesser Redacted), # 5 Exhibit 8 (Lesser Redacted), # 6 Exhibit 9 (to Remain Under Seal), # 7 Exhibit 21 (Lesser Redacted), # 8 Exhibit 22 (Lesser Redacted), # 9 Exhibit 26 (Lesser Redacted), # 10 Exhibit 27 (Lesser Redacted), # 11 Exhibit 28 (Lesser Redacted), # 12 Exhibit 29 (Lesser Redacted), # 13 Exhibit 30 (Lesser Redacted), # 14 Exhibit Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Lesser Redacted, # 15 Exhibit Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow (Less Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012	606	Response to 206 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Google Inc.s Brief In Support Of Motion To Compel And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Jen Ghaussy in Support Thereof Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit H (Undreacted, Public Form), # 2 Exhibit I (Unredacted, Public Form), # 3 Exhibit L (Unredacted, Public Form), # 4 Exhibit M (Unredacted, Public Form), # 5 Exhibit N (Unredacted, Public Form), # 6 Exhibit P (Unredacted, Public Form), # 7 Exhibit Q (Unredacted, Public Form), # 8 Exhibit R (Unredacted, Public Form), # 9 Exhibit S (Undredacted, Public Form), # 10 Exhibit T (Unredacted, Public Form), # 11 Exhibit U (Unredacted, Public Form))(Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012	604	Response to 234 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration o Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Unredacted, Public Form))(Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012	602	Response to 226 MOTION to Seal Portions of Google Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Reply Brief in Support of the Motion to Compel (Unredacted, Public Form))(Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012	600	Response to 214 MOTION to Seal Motion To Seal Portions Of Defendants Brief In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Discovery Sanctions And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Emily OBrien In Support Thereof Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit M to the Declaration of Emily O'Brien (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit N to the Declaration of Emily O'Brien (Lesser, # 3 Exhibit Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (Lesser Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012	594	Response to 206 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Google Inc.s Brief In Support Of Motion To Compel And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Jen Ghaussy in Support Thereof Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit B (Lesser Redacted), # 3 Exhibit C (Lesser Redacted), # 4 Exhibit J (Lesser Redacted), # 5 Exhibit K (Lesser Redacted), # 6 Exhibit Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Compel (Lesser Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012	591	Response to 181 MOTION to Seal Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(1) Depositions MOTION to Seal Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(1) Depositions Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portsions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(1) Depositions (Lesser Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012	590	Response to 136 MOTION to Seal Portions of Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Compel and Exhibits AA and BB to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of the Reply Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit AA (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit BB (Lesser Redacted), # 3 Exhibit Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Compel (Lesser Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)
October 3, 2012		Reset Hearings: Final Pretrial Conference reset for 10/9/2012 at 02:30 PM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (ptom)

April 21, 2014

1099

ORDER granting 1092 Motion to Stay. Because the parties have agreed to stay the payments, the basis for the accounting outlined in the Court's 8/14/13 Order no longer exists pending that stay. However, if the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit enters a final judgment in plaintiff's favor, the Court will require Defendants to IMMEDIATELY produce the U.S. revenue attributable to their use of AdWords and the calculation of the royalty payment for past quarters. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/18/14. (afar, )

April 17, 2014

1098

REPLY to Response to Motion re 1092 MOTION to Stay of Requirement that Defendants Provide Revenue Information and Calculations of Ongoing Royalty Payments filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

April 14, 2014

1097

STIPULATION re 1096 Proposed Stipulation by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/11/14 and filed on 4/14/14. (tbro)

April 11, 2014

1096

STIPULATION by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

April 10, 2014

1095

Opposition to 1092 MOTION to Stay of Requirement that Defendants Provide Revenue Information and Calculations of Ongoing Royalty Payments filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

April 2, 2014

1094

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 975 Declaration, of Filing of Corrected Exhibit (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)

March 27, 2014

1093

Memorandum in Support re 1092 MOTION to Stay of Requirement that Defendants Provide Revenue Information and Calculations of Ongoing Royalty Payments filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

March 27, 2014

1092

MOTION to Stay of Requirement that Defendants Provide Revenue Information and Calculations of Ongoing Royalty Payments by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

February 11, 2014

1091

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 14-1289 for 1089 Notice of Appeal, filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. (14-1289) (tbro)

February 7, 2014

1090

Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Federal Circuit re 1089 Notice of Appeal. Appeal Package emailed to the Federal Circuit. (tbro)

February 5, 2014

1089

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 1086 Memorandum Opinion, 963 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, 1088 Memorandum Opinion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0422-3840302. (Noona, Stephen)

January 28, 2014

1088

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/28/14. (tbro)

January 24, 2014

1087

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation before Judge Jackson, (Noona, Stephen)

January 22, 2014

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard:Settlement Conference held on 1/22/2014. (cdod, )

January 21, 2014

1086

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/21/14. (tbro)

January 21, 2014

Reset Hearings: Settlement Conference set for 1/22/2014 at 01:00 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (cdod, )

January 21, 2014

Set Hearings Telephone Conference set for 1/21/2014 at 02:30 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (cdod, )

January 14, 2014

1085

STIPULATION by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

January 14, 2014

1084

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 14-1233 for 1082 Notice of Appeal filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. (14-1233) (tbro)

January 13, 2014

1083

Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Federal Circuit re 1082 Notice of Appeal. Appeal Package emailed to the Federal Circuit 1/13/14. (tbro)

January 10, 2014

1082

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 960 Memorandum Opinion,, 1081 Memorandum Opinion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0422-3809476. (Noona, Stephen)

January 3, 2014

1081

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/3/14. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1080

ORDER granting 1049 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc December 23, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1079

ORDER granting 1045 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc November 11, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1078

ORDER granting 1029 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 31, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1077

ORDER granting 1025 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 30, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1076

ORDER granting 1017 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 30, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1075

ORDER granting 1011 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 28, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1074

ORDER granting 1000 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 21, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1073

ORDER granting 995 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc October 4, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1072

ORDER granting 970 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc August 26, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1071

ORDER granting 965 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/23/13, Nunc Pro Tunc August 21, 2013. (tbro)

December 23, 2013

1070

ORDER granting 936 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013, Nunc Pro Tunc May 13, 2013. (

December 23, 2013

1069

ORDER granting 954 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013, Nunc Pro TuncJune 21, 2013.

December 23, 2013

1068

ORDER granting 958 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013, Nunc Pro Tunc July 31, 2013.

December 23, 2013

1067

ORDER granting 987 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013.

December 23, 2013

1066

ORDER denying 1006 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013.

December 23, 2013

1065

ORDER denying 1021 Motion. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 21, 2013.

December 23, 2013

1064

ORDER finding as moot 1041 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 23, 2013.

December 18, 2013

1063

ORDER granting 1062 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Emily Christina O'Brien terminated. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/18/13. (tbro)

December 13, 2013

1062

Consent MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (Consent Motion and Memorandum In Support Of Consent Motion To Withdraw Appearance of Attorney Emily OBrien) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 11, 2013

1061

Settlement Conference Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 12/11/13. (tbro)

December 4, 2013

Set Hearings: Settlement Conference set for 1/22/2014 at 09:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (cdod, )

November 18, 2013

1060

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 963 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, Joint Submission Regarding Court Ordered Meet and Confer Regarding Post-Judgment Royalties (Schultz, Donald)

November 18, 2013

1059

CERTIFICATE of Service re 1052 Opposition, by Jeffrey Kirk Sherwood on behalf of I/P Engine, Inc. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 18, 2013

1058

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 11-07-2013, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden,OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 12/18/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/21/2014. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/18/2014.(borden, sharon)

November 18, 2013

Notice of Correction re 1052 Opposition, Please file the Certificate of Service as a separate document. Use the Certificate of Service event (under notices) and link the Certificate of Service to the document it was omitted from. (tbro)

November 15, 2013

1057

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1044 Order on Motion for Order to Show Cause, in Response to the Court's November 7, 2013 Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 15, 2013

1056

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 1044 Order on Motion for Order to Show Cause, in Response to the Court's November 7, 2013 Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Noona, Stephen)

November 13, 2013

1055

Reply to Motion re 1021 MOTION Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order re 1020 Memorandum, and Proposed Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Schultz, Donald)

November 12, 2013

1054

Sealed Document re 1052 Opposition. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)

November 12, 2013

1053

Sealed Document re 1048 Reply. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)

November 11, 2013

1052

Opposition to 1033 Sealed Document Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in Support of Opposition)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 11, 2013

1051

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1049 MOTION to Seal Opposition to Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order and the Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in support of its Opposition (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 11, 2013

1050

Memorandum in Support re 1049 MOTION to Seal Opposition to Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order and the Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in support of its Opposition filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 11, 2013

1049

MOTION to Seal Opposition to Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order and the Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in support of its Opposition by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 11, 2013

1048

Reply to 963 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, Defendants Responsive Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

November 11, 2013

1047

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 1045 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Defendants Responsive Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order (Noona, Stephen)

November 11, 2013

1046

Memorandum in Support re 1045 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Defendants Responsive Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

November 11, 2013

1045

MOTION to Seal Portions Of Defendants Responsive Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

November 7, 2013

1044

ORDER denying 978 Motion for Order to Show Cause. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff and Defendant each provide the Court with names of two (2) experts unaffiliated with any of the parties who are capable of determining whether Google's re-design of its infringing system is no more than a colorable variation ofthe adjudged infringing system by November 15, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/7/13. (afar)

November 7, 2013

1043

Motion Hearing held before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/7/2013 re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. Attorneys Donald Schultz, Frank Cimino, Jr., Charles J. Monterio, Jr. and Jonathan Falkler appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. Attorneys David Perlson, David Nelson, Jennifer Polse, and Stephen Noona appeared on behalf of the defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc. and Target Corporation. Comments of the Court. Argument of counsel heard. Court DENIES plaintiffs #978 Motion. Court DIRECTS the parties to forward names of two individual experts who are capable and competent to evaluate the design around of the patent by Nov. 15, 2014. Court to issue an order. Court adjourned. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom, )

November 5, 2013

1042

Memorandum in Support re 1041 MOTION for Leave to File to File Response to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Ru filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)

November 5, 2013

1041

MOTION for Leave to File to File Response to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

November 1, 2013

1040

Sealed Document re 1029 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 Order, 1030 Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)

November 1, 2013

1039

Sealed Document re 1029 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 Order, 1030 Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)

October 31, 2013

1038

Sealed Document re 1028 Memorandum. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(tbro)

October 31, 2013

1037

Sealed Document re 1024 Declaration. (tbro)

October 31, 2013

1036

Sealed Document re 1024 Declaration. (tbro)

October 31, 2013

1035

Sealed Document re 1024 Declaration. (tbro)

October 31, 2013

1034

Sealed Document re 1022 Memorandum in Support. (tbro)

October 31, 2013

1033

Sealed Document re 1020 Memorandum. (tbro) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2013: # 1 Letter) (tbro, ).

October 31, 2013

1032

Memorandum in Support re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER (Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts) filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 31, 2013

1031

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1029 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 O rder and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 31, 2013

1030

Memorandum in Support re 1029 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 O rder and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 31, 2013

1029

MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 Order and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 30, 2013

1028

Memorandum Opening Brief on Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, # 2 Declaration of Dr. Stephen Becker)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 30, 2013

1027

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1025 MOTION to Seal I/P Engines Opening Brief on Post-Judgment Royalties and accompanying Declarations of Drs. Stephen Becker and Ophir Frieder (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 30, 2013

1026

Memorandum in Support re 1025 MOTION to Seal I/P Engines Opening Brief on Post-Judgment Royalties and accompanying Declarations of Drs. Stephen Becker and Ophir Frieder filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 30, 2013

1025

MOTION to Seal I/P Engines Opening Brief on Post-Judgment Royalties and accompanying Declarations of Drs. Stephen Becker and Ophir Frieder by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 30, 2013

1024

Declaration re 1022 Memorandum in Support, (Declaration Of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence And Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Public Version), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Public Version), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Public Version))(Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2013

1023

Declaration re 1022 Memorandum in Support, (Declaration of Kristan Burch in Support of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2013

1022

Memorandum in Support re 1021 MOTION Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order re 1020 Memorandum, and Proposed Order (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2013

1021

MOTION Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Of Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order re 1020 Memorandum, and Proposed Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2013

1020

Memorandum (Defendants' Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Court's August 14 Order)(Public Version) to 963 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,, filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2013

1019

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 1017 MOTION to Seal (Motion To Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; (2) Portions Of The Brief In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; and (3) Exhibits 1-3 Of The Declaration Of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order (Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2013

1018

Memorandum in Support re 1017 MOTION to Seal (Motion To Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; (2) Portions Of The Brief In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; and (3) Exhibits 1-3 Of The Declaration Of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2013

1017

MOTION to Seal (Motion To Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; (2) Portions Of The Brief In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order; and (3) Exhibits 1-3 Of The Declaration of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Motion For Leave To Submit Evidence and Offer Proof In Support Of Defendants Opening Brief On Issues Raised In The Courts August 14 Order) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2013

1016

ORDER granting 993 Motion for Leave to File Additional Facts Justifying Its Motion for Defendants to Show Cause under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with August 13, 2013 Order. The supplement shall not exceed ten (10) pages including any attachments. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 30, 2013.

October 29, 2013

1015

Sealed Document. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Letter)(tbro)

October 28, 2013

1014

REPLY to Response to Motion re 993 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 28, 2013

1013

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1011 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 28, 2013

1012

Memorandum in Support re 1011 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 28, 2013

1011

MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 22, 2013

1010

***SEALED*** re 1005 Exhibits 6-10 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Memorandum (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 6, # 2 Exhibit 7, # 3 Exhibit 8, # 4 Exhibit 9, # 5 Exhibit 10).(bgra)

October 22, 2013

1009

**SEALED*** re 1004 DECLARATION OF KRISTIN ZMRHAL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTALMEMORANDUM REGARDING MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE. (bgra)

October 21, 2013

1006

MOTION to Strike 998 Memorandum in Support,,, of Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 21, 2013

1005

Declaration re 1003 Opposition, (of Joshua L. Sohn) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15)(Noona, Stephen)

October 21, 2013

1004

Declaration re 1003 Opposition, (of Kristin Zmrhal) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause (Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 21, 2013

1003

Opposition to 993 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 21, 2013

1002

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 1000 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of the Declaration of Kristin Zmrhal in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintifif's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause; (2) Portions of Exhibits 6-8 to the Dec (Noona, Stephen)

October 21, 2013

1001

Memorandum in Support re 1000 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of the Declaration of Kristin Zmrhal in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintifif's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause; (2) Portions of Exhibits 6-8 to the Dec filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 21, 2013

1000

MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of the Declaration of Kristin Zmrhal in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintifif's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Motion to Show Cause; (2) Portions of Exhibits 6-8 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support Thereof; and (3) Exhibits 9-10 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support Thereof by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 18, 2013

Set Hearing as to 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER. Motion Hearing set for 11/7/2013 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (ptom)

October 8, 2013

1008

***SEALED*** re 995 MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with attachments filed 10/8/13. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(bgra)

October 8, 2013

1007

***SEALED*** re 999 DECLARATION OF CHARLES J. MONTERIO, JR. IN SUPPORT OF I/P ENGINE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUMOF ADDITIONAL FACTS filed 10/8/2013.(bgra)

October 7, 2013

999

Declaration re 998 Memorandum in Support,,, of Charles J. Monterio, Jr., in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 7, 2013

998

Memorandum in Support re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER, 993 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order, 995 MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with Exhibits A and C and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 7, 2013

997

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 995 MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with Exhibits A and C and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 7, 2013

996

Memorandum in Support re 995 MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with Exhibits A and C and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. In Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 7, 2013

995

MOTION to Seal Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order Along with Exhibits A and C and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. In Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 7, 2013

994

Memorandum in Support re 993 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 7, 2013

993

MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 2, 2013

992

ORDER finding as moot 981 Motion to Shorten Response Time. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 2, 2013.

October 1, 2013

991

REPLY to Response to Motion re 987 MOTION to Strike 986 Response in Support of Motion (Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) (Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Show Cause Reply) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2013

990

RESPONSE in Opposition re 987 MOTION to Strike 986 Response in Support of Motion (Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Schultz, Donald)

September 13, 2013

989

Declaration re 988 Memorandum in Support, (Declaration of Stephen E. Noona in Support of Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 13, 2013

988

Memorandum in Support re 987 MOTION to Strike 986 Response in Support of Motion (Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) (Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 13, 2013

987

MOTION to Strike 986 Response in Support of Motion (Defendants Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Reply In Support Of Motion To Show Cause) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2013

986

RESPONSE in Support re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER and Request for Hearing filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 4, 2013

985

Declaration re 982 Opposition,, (Declaration of Roseanne Eff in Support of Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Defendants To Show Cause ) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2013

984

Declaration re 982 Opposition,, (Declaration of Kristin Zmrhal in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plainitiff's Motion For Defendants to Show Cause) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2013

983

Declaration re 982 Opposition,, (Declaration of Antonio Sistos) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2013

982

Opposition to 981 MOTION SHORTEN DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO I/P ENGINES MOTION re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER , 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER (Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Motion For Defendants To Show Cause Under Rule 37 For Noncompliance With August 13, 2013 Order) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

August 29, 2013

981

MOTION SHORTEN DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO I/P ENGINES MOTION re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 29, 2013

980

Declaration re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER OF CHARLES J. MONTERIO, JR. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 29, 2013

979

Memorandum in Support re 978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 29, 2013

978

MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 27, 2013

977

SEALED EXHIBIT B re 975 Declaration Declaration Of Margaret P. Kammerud by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation filed under seal. (rsim, )

August 27, 2013

976

SEALED EXHIBIT 1 re 974 Declaration of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation filed under seal. (rsim, )

August 26, 2013

975

Declaration re 973 Opposition, Declaration Of Margaret P. Kammerud In Support Of Defendants Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B (Public Version))(Noona, Stephen)

August 26, 2013

974

Declaration re 973 Opposition, Declaration Of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D. In Support Of Defendants' Response To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest, and Post-Judgment Interest by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Public Version), # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Noona, Stephen)

August 26, 2013

973

Opposition to 968 NOTICE, Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

August 26, 2013

972

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 970 MOTION to Seal (1) Exhibit 1 To The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest; and (2) Exhibi (Noona, Stephen)

August 26, 2013

971

Memorandum in Support re 970 MOTION to Seal (1) Exhibit 1 To The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest; and (2) Exhibi filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

August 26, 2013

970

MOTION to Seal (1) Exhibit 1 To The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition To Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest; and (2) Exhibit B To The Declaration Of Margaret P. Kammerud In Support Thereof by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

August 21, 2013

969

Sealed Documents re 968 NOTICE,. (Attachments: # 1 Letter, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(ldab, )

August 21, 2013

968

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 960 Memorandum Opinion,, of Plaintiff's Calculation of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest and Post-Judgment Interest (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 21, 2013

967

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 965 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest And Post-Judgment Interest (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 21, 2013

966

Memorandum in Support re 965 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest And Post-Judgment Interest filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 21, 2013

965

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Notice Of Calculation Of Supplemental Damages, Prejudgment Interest And Post-Judgment Interest by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 16, 2013

964

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation Notice of Compliance (Noona, Stephen)

August 14, 2013

963

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and deferring in part 822 Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties. Within 5 days of completing the aforementioned discovery and briefing schedule, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and to negotiate an appropriate ongoingroyalty rate, using 20.9% of U.S. AdWords revenues as the appropriate royalty base; if the parties are unable to come to an agreement, the Court Orders the parties to schedule a settlement conference with the United States Magistrate Judge assigned to this case no later than December 1, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/13/2013 and filed on 8/14/2013. (rsim, )

August 8, 2013

962

RESPONSE in Support re 958 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 2, 2013

961

Opposition to 958 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

August 1, 2013

960

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that I/P Engine is entitled to supplemental damages for October 1, 2012 to November 20, 2012, in an amount to be determined, prejudgment interest in an amount to be determined from September 15, 2011 to November 20, 2012, and post-judgment interest for Defendants' infringement in an amount to be determined. Accordingly, I/P Engine's 792 motion is GRANTED; that the defendants are to provide an accounting of revenue for the accused products through the date of judgment, November 20, 2012, WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. (See Order for further specifics). Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 8/1/2013. (rsim, )

July 31, 2013

959

Memorandum in Support re 958 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

July 31, 2013

958

MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

June 21, 2013

957

REPLY to Response to Motion re 954 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Evidence filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

June 17, 2013

956

Opposition to 954 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Evidence filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

June 4, 2013

955

Memorandum in Support re 954 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Evidence filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

June 4, 2013

954

MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Evidence by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Noona, Stephen)

May 24, 2013

953

RESPONSE in Support re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Corrected Reply filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

May 24, 2013

952

ORDER granting 951 Motion for Leave to File; granting plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. leave of Court to file its corrected Reply in Support of its Motion for an Award for Post-Judgment Royalties. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 5/24/13. (mwin, )

May 23, 2013

951

MOTION for Leave to File Corrected Reply in Support of its Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Reply in Support of its Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Schultz, Donald)

May 21, 2013

Notice of Correction re 950 Declaration: (1) Counsel's signature does not include the required nine-element signature block. (2) The heading of the document indicates the wrong division. Counsel is advised that in all future filings, the full nine-element signature block is required, and the correct division should be indicated on the document. (mwin, )

May 20, 2013

950

Declaration re 949 Response in Support of Motion of Dr. Stephen L. Becker, Ph.D. Regarding Ongoing Royalties by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

May 20, 2013

949

RESPONSE in Support re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

May 14, 2013

948

SEALED Documents: Sealed version of Exhibits 10-21 to 942 Declaration of Margaret Kammerud in Support of Opposition to Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties; filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 10, # 2 Exhibit 11, # 3 Exhibit 12, # 4 Exhibit 13, # 5 Exhibit 14, # 6 Exhibit 15, # 7 Exhibit 16, # 8 Exhibit 17, # 9 Exhibit 18, # 10 Exhibit 19, # 11 Exhibit 20, # 12 Exhibit 21)(mwin, )

May 14, 2013

947

SEALED Documents: Sealed version of Exhibits 2-9 to the 942 Declaration of Margaret Kammerud in Support of Opposition to Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties; filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2, # 2 Exhibit 3, # 3 Exhibit 4, # 4 Exhibit 5, # 5 Exhibit 6, # 6 Exhibit 7, # 7 Exhibit 8, # 8 Exhibit 9)(mwin, )

May 14, 2013

946

SEALED Document: Sealed version of Declaration of Keith Ugone, Ph.D, in support of 938 Memorandum in Opposition by defendants; filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )

May 14, 2013

945

SEALED Document: Sealed version of Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow in support of 938 Memorandum in Opposition by defendants; filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )

May 14, 2013

944

SEALED Document: Sealed version of Defendants' Opposition to 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties, filed under seal per #936 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )

May 14, 2013

943

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 936 MOTION to Seal (Noona, Stephen)

May 14, 2013

Notice of Correction re 936 MOTION to Seal: The title of the document was shown twice ("MOTION to Seal motion to seal"). The clerk edited the entry to remove the duplicate language.(mwin, )

May 13, 2013

942

Declaration re 938 Memorandum in Opposition, by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2 (Public Version), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Public Version), # 4 Exhibit 4 (Public Version), # 5 Exhibit 5 (Public Version), # 6 Exhibit 6 (Public Version), # 7 Exhibit 7 (Public Version), # 8 Exhibit 8 (Public Version), # 9 Exhibit 9 (Public Version), # 10 Exhibit 10 (Public Version), # 11 Exhibit 11 (Public Version), # 12 Exhibit 12 (Public Version), # 13 Exhibit 13 (Public Version), # 14 Exhibit 14 (Public Version), # 15 Exhibit 15 (Public Version), # 16 Exhibit 16 (Public Version), # 17 Exhibit 17 (Public Version), # 18 Exhibit 18 (Public Version), # 19 Exhibit 19 (Public Version), # 20 Exhibit 20 (Public Version), # 21 Exhibit 21 (Public Version), # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30)(Noona, Stephen)

May 13, 2013

941

Declaration re 938 Memorandum in Opposition, (of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties)(Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

May 13, 2013

940

Declaration re 938 Memorandum in Opposition, (of Bartholomew Furrow In Support Of Defendants Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties)(Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

May 13, 2013

939

Declaration re 938 Memorandum in Opposition, (Declaration of Brian Keuthe in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plainitff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

May 13, 2013

938

Memorandum in Opposition re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties (Defendants Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties)(Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

May 13, 2013

937

Memorandum in Support re 936 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties, (2) Portions Of The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition, (3) Certain Exhibits To filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen) Modified on 5/14/2013 to remove duplicate language by changing "MOTION to Seal motion to seal" to "MOTION to Seal." (mwin, )

May 13, 2013

936

MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties, (2) Portions Of The Declaration Of Keith Ugone, Ph.D., In Support Of Defendants Opposition, (3) Certain Exhibits To The Declaration Of Margaret Kammerud In Support Of Defendants Opposition, and (4) Portions Of The Declaration Of Bartholomew Furrow In Support Of Defendants Opposition by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen) Modified on 5/14/2013 to remove duplicate language by changing "MOTION to Seal motion to seal" to "MOTION to Seal."(mwin, )

May 1, 2013

935

ORDER denying 923 Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Beckerand for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-judgment Royalties; directing defendants to respond to plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties within ten days of entry of this order; permitting plaintiff to file a reply within five days of defendants' response. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 5/1/13. (mwin, )

April 22, 2013

934

Opposition to 923 MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

April 17, 2013

933

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, (Noona, Stephen)

April 17, 2013

932

STIPULATION - See Attached Document for Specifics. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/17/2013. (bnew)

April 17, 2013

931

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by I/P Engine, Inc. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

April 17, 2013

930

ORDER re 923 MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 923) WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS of the entry of this Order. Defendants shall forego filing a Reply brief in support of their motion. Briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 822) is hereby SUSPENDED until the Court rules on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties. The Court will provide additional instructions regarding briefing schedule of Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties upon resolution of Defendants renewed motion. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/17/2013. (bnew)

April 17, 2013

929

Declaration re 928 Reply to Response to Motion, (Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Expediting the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

April 17, 2013

928

REPLY to Response to Motion re 926 MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

April 16, 2013

927

Opposition to 926 MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

April 16, 2013

926

MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)

April 16, 2013

925

Declaration re 924 Memorandum in Support, (Declaration of David Perlson in Support of Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)

April 16, 2013

924

Memorandum in Support re 923 MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

April 16, 2013

923

MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)

April 9, 2013

922

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 13-1313 for cross-appeal, 914 Notice of Appeal filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. (mwin, )

April 5, 2013

921

ORDER granting 913 Motion for Joseph R. Re to appear Pro hac vice for I/P Engine, Inc. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/5/13. (mwin, )

April 5, 2013

920

AMENDED ORDER Regarding Parties' Joint Response to the Court's Order Regarding Outstanding Motions to Seal Case Documents, amending 911 Order as outlined. (See Order for specifics.) Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/4/13; filed 4/5/13. (mwin, )

April 5, 2013

919

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 11-06-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 5/6/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/5/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/5/2013.(borden, sharon)

April 5, 2013

918

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 11-05-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 5/6/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/5/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/5/2013.(borden, sharon)

April 5, 2013

917

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 11-02-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 5/6/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/5/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/5/2013.(borden, sharon)

April 5, 2013

916

Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Federal Circuit re 914 Notice of Appeal. (mwin, )

April 4, 2013

915

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 13-1307 for 910 Notice of Appeal filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 caption notice)(mwin, )

April 4, 2013

914

NOTICE OF APPEAL by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 0422-3464587. (Noona, Stephen)

April 4, 2013

913

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Joseph R. Re and Certification of Local Counsel W. Ryan Snow Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3463977. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)

April 4, 2013

912

Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Federal Circuit re 910 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 party and attorney list)(mwin, )

April 3, 2013

911

ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' JOINT RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING MOTIONS TO SEAL CASE DOCUMENTS deeming certain motions moot; granting certain motions; denying certain motions; granting certain motions as to the lesser redacted materials. (See order for specifics.) Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/3/13. (mwin, )

April 3, 2013

910

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 800 Memorandum Opinion, 884 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 908 Order on Motion for New Trial by I/P Engine, Inc.. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 0422-3463041. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

April 3, 2013

909

ORDER directing Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties within 15 days of the entry of this Order; permitting Plaintiff to file a reply to Defendants' response within 7 days. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/3/13. (mwin, )

April 2, 2013

908

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 825 Motion for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/2/13. (mwin, )

April 2, 2013

907

ORDER denying Defendants' 833 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Damages or New Trial. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/2/13. (mwin, )

April 2, 2013

906

ORDER denying Defendants' 831 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/2/13. (mwin, )

April 2, 2013

905

ORDER denying Defendants' 820 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/2/13. (mwin, )

April 2, 2013

904

ORDER granting 900 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on April 1, 2013.

March 18, 2013

903

RESPONSE in Support re 900 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

March 11, 2013

902

Opposition to 900 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

March 1, 2013

901

Memorandum in Support re 900 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)

March 1, 2013

900

MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Snow, W. Ryan)

February 28, 2013

Notice of Correction re 899 NOTICE (of Supplemental Authority): Leave of court is required for filing of supplemental authority, pursuant to Local Rule 7(F)(1). (mwin, )

February 28, 2013

899

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 871 Opposition, Notice of Supplemental Authority (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit VirnetX Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

February 19, 2013

898

Response to 886 Order,,, (Parties' Joint Response to the Court's Order Regarding Outstanding Motions to Seal Case Documents) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

February 15, 2013

897

Declaration re 896 Response in Support of Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

February 15, 2013

896

RESPONSE in Support re 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

February 15, 2013

895

Declaration re 894 Reply to Response to Motion, 893 Reply to Motion, 892 Reply to Motion, (Declaration Of Howard Chen In Support Of Defendants Reply Briefs In Support Of Defendants Renewed Motions For Judgment As A Matter Of Law) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)

February 15, 2013

894

REPLY to Response to Motion re 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

February 15, 2013

893

Reply to Motion re 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

February 15, 2013

892

Reply to Motion re 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

February 12, 2013

891

ORDER granting in part and denied in part 888 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Counsel shall file a response no later than February 19, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on February 12, 2013.

February 12, 2013

890

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 889 NOTICE of Corrected Continued Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Bill of Costs (Noona, Stephen)

February 12, 2013

889

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Suffolk Technologies, LLC, Target Corporation re 887 Bill of Costs of Continued Opposition to Plaintifif's Amended Bill of Costs (Noona, Stephen)

February 12, 2013

888

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 886 Order,,, (Joint Motion and Memorandum In Support Of Joint Motion For an Extension Of Time To Respond To The Courts Order on Outstanding Motions To Seal) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

February 7, 2013

886

ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING MOTIONS TO SEAL CASE DOCUMENTS - WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS of the entry of this order, the Court ORDERS the parties to undertake an assessment of outstanding motions to seal case records and provide the namesand document numbers of motions to seal that are now moot, withdrawn, or that should otherwise be dismissed. The Court ORDERS the parties to submit a proposed order disposing of any outstanding motions to seal that are moot, withdrawn, or otherwise should be dismissed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties affirmatively identify, by name and document number, which outstanding motions to seal should still be resolved by the Court. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 2/6/13 and filed on 2/7/13. (jcow, )

February 5, 2013

885

ORDER finding as moot 859 Motion to Expedite. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller on 2/5/2013. (Miller, Tommy)

February 4, 2013

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller: 859 MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite Briefing on Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker. (mwin, )

February 4, 2013

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller: 828 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of Defendants' Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law. (mwin, )

January 31, 2013

884

ORDER denying 835 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment under Rule 52(b) and a New Trial under Rule 59 on Laches. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 1/31/13. (mwin, )

January 30, 2013

883

AGREED ORDER granting 879 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; ORDERED that Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 may exceed the page limit specified inLocal Rule 7(F)(3) as filed in their current form on January 25, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/29/13 and filed on 1/30/13. (jcow, )

January 29, 2013

882

Withdrawal of Motion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 856 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker (Without Prejudice) (Noona, Stephen)

January 29, 2013

881

Sealed Document - Opposition Memorandum, re 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial. (jcow, )

January 28, 2013

880

Memorandum in Support re 879 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages as to Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)

January 28, 2013

879

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages as to Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Snow, W. Ryan)

January 28, 2013

878

SEALED Document: Sealed Exhibit 2 to 870 Declaration; filed under seal pursuant to 866 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )

January 28, 2013

877

SEALED Document: Defendants' Sealed version of Memorandum in Opposition to plaintiff's 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages; filed under seal pursuant to 866 motion to seal. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(mwin, )

January 28, 2013

Notice of Correction re 876 Opposition, this document contains excess pages. The filing user has been notified to file a motion for leave of court to properly file this document. (jcow, )

January 28, 2013

Notice of Correction re 872 Opposition, this document contains excess pages. The filing user has been notified that leave of court is required to properly file this document. (jcow, )

January 28, 2013

Notice of Correction re 871 Opposition, this document contains excess pages. The filing user has been notified that a motion for leave of court is required to properly file this document. (jcow, )

January 25, 2013

876

Opposition to 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

January 25, 2013

875

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 873 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Opposition to Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement or New Trial (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

January 25, 2013

874

Memorandum in Support re 873 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Opposition to Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement or New Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

January 25, 2013

873

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.s Opposition to Defendants Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement or New Trial by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

January 25, 2013

872

Opposition to 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

January 25, 2013

871

Opposition to 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

January 25, 2013

870

Declaration re 869 Memorandum in Opposition (of Margaret P. Kammerud) in Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)

January 25, 2013

869

Memorandum in Opposition re 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

January 25, 2013

868

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 866 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Damages and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud Filed in Support Thereof (Noona, Stephen)

January 25, 2013

867

Memorandum in Support re 866 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Damages and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud Filed in Support Thereof filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

January 25, 2013

866

MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Damages and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud Filed in Support Thereof by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

January 25, 2013

Notice of Correction re 863 Opposition: The clerk edited the entry to add all filers stated in the document. (mwin, )

January 25, 2013

865

Declaration re 863 Opposition (of Dave Nelson) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial Under Rule 59 on Laches by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Noona, Stephen)

January 25, 2013

864

Declaration re 863 Opposition (of Jennifer Polse) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial Under Rule 59 on Laches by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

January 25, 2013

863

Opposition to 835 MOTION for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59 filed by IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc. . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen) Modified on 1/25/2013 to add filers as stated in the document.(mwin, )

January 25, 2013

862

Declaration re 861 Reply Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. In Support of I/P Engine Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Bill of Costs by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

January 25, 2013

861

Reply to 809 Bill of Costs I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Bill of Costs filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

January 23, 2013

860

ORDER granting 847 Motion to postpone briefing and ruling; The parties' briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 822) and the Court's consideration of said motion shall be postponed until after the Court rules on the parties' post-trial motions currently pending before the Court under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50, 52, and 59. The Court will provide further guidance on the revised briefing schedule for Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties as necessary after the Court completes its consideration of the other relevant post-trial motions. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 1/23/13. (jcow, )

January 16, 2013

859

MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite Briefing on Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

January 16, 2013

858

Declaration re 857 Memorandum in Support (of Stephen E. Noona) in Support of Defendants' Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)

January 16, 2013

857

Memorandum in Support re 856 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

January 16, 2013

856

MOTION to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

January 11, 2013

855

Declaration re 854 Opposition (of Sarah Agudo) in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Bill of Costs by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Noona, Stephen)

January 11, 2013

854

Opposition to 809 Bill of Costs filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

January 3, 2013

853

REPLY to Response to Motion re 847 MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

December 31, 2012

852

Opposition to 847 MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 24, 2012

851

ORDER granting 849 Joint Motion to Expedite Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Postpone Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 24, 2012.

December 24, 2012

850

ORDER granting 846 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on December 24, 2012.

December 21, 2012

849

Joint MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Expedite Briefing On Defendants Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 21, 2012

848

Memorandum in Support re 847 MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)

December 21, 2012

847

MOTION re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties Motion To Postpone Briefing And Ruling On Plaintiffs Motion For Post-Judgment Royalties by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 21, 2012

846

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages, 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial, 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties, 835 MOTION for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59, 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial, 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 19, 2012

845

Sealed Document - Exhibit 1 to thet declaration in Joshua L. Sohn in support of defendants' renewed motions for judgment as a matter of law on damages, invalidity, and non-infringement or new trial (836). (jcow, )

December 19, 2012

844

Sealed Document - Memorandum in support of defendants' renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law on damages or new trial (834). (jcow, )

December 19, 2012

843

Sealed Document - Memorandum in support of defendants' renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law on non-infringement or new trial (832). (jcow, )

December 18, 2012

842

Declaration re 837 Memorandum in Support, of W. Ryan Snow by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

841

Declaration re 837 Memorandum in Support, of Kenneth Brothers by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

840

Declaration re 837 Memorandum in Support, of Jeffrey K. Sherwood by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

839

Declaration re 837 Memorandum in Support, of Dawn Rudenko by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

838

Request for Hearing by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial, 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial, 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial (Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

837

Memorandum in Support re 835 MOTION for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

836

Declaration re 821 Memorandum in Support, 832 Memorandum in Support, 834 Memorandum in Support, Declaration Of Joshua L. Sohn In Support Of Defendants Renewed Motions For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages, Invalidity, And Non-Infringement Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

835

MOTION for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

834

Memorandum in Support re 833 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

833

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or A New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

832

Memorandum in Support re 831 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

831

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

830

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 828 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On (Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

829

Memorandum in Support re 828 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

828

MOTION to Seal (1) Portions Of Defendants Memorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Non-Infringement Or New Trial; (2) Portions Of DefendantsMemorandum In Support Of Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages Or New Trial; And (3) Certain Exhibit To The Declaration Of Joshua L. Sohn In Support Of Defendants Renewed Motions For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Damages, Invalidity And Non-Infringement Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

827

Declaration re 826 Memorandum in Support of Jeffrey K. Sherwood by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit PDX442 and PDX443)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

826

Memorandum in Support re 825 MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

825

MOTION for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

824

Declaration re 823 Memorandum in Support of Stephen L. Becker by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

823

Memorandum in Support re 822 MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

822

MOTION for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 18, 2012

821

Memorandum in Support re 820 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

820

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Invalidity Or New Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 18, 2012

819

AGREED ORDER granting 817 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; the Defendants shall have through and including January 11, 2013 in which to file their Response to Plaintiffs Bill of Costs. In addition, Plaintiff willhave through and including January 25, 2013, to file its reply in support of its Bill of Costs. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 12/17/12 and filed on 12/18/12. (jcow, )

December 17, 2012

817

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 809 Bill of Costs (Unopposed) and Memorandum in Support of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Bill of Costs by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

December 13, 2012

816

Request for Hearing by Google Inc. re 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record (Noona, Stephen)

December 13, 2012

815

REPLY to Response to Motion re 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record filed by Google Inc.. (Noona, Stephen)

December 7, 2012

814

Declaration re 813 Reply to Response to Motion of Stephen L. Becker, Ph.D. In Further Support Of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.S Motion For An Award Of Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest And Damages For Defendants Continuing Infringement by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 7, 2012

813

REPLY to Response to Motion re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 5, 2012

812

Opposition to 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 5, 2012

811

AGREED ORDER granting 808 Motion to Stay execution of judgmetn pending disposition of a motion - ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion To Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Disposition of a Motion is granted, and any proceedings to execute on or enforce the Final Judgment against Defendants shall be stayed pending resolution of any post-judgment motions timely filed in this case, and for 14 days thereafter. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 12/5/12. (jcow, )

December 3, 2012

810

Declaration re 809 Bill of Costs of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 3, 2012

809

BILL OF COSTS by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

December 3, 2012

808

MOTION to Stay (Unopposed) and Memorandum in Support of Unopposed Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Disposition of a Motion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

November 29, 2012

807

Declaration re 805 Opposition,, Declaration of Sarah Agudo in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest, and Supplemental Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Noona, Stephen)

November 29, 2012

806

Declaration re 805 Opposition,, Declaration of Keith R. Ugone, PhD. in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Award pf Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest and Supplemental Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)

November 29, 2012

805

Opposition to 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT, 791 NOTICE Defendants Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For An Award Of Prejudgment Interest, Defendants Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For An Award Of Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest and Supplemental Damages filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

November 21, 2012

804

NOTICE by Google Inc. re 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record and of Intent to Request Redaction (Noona, Stephen)

November 21, 2012

803

Memorandum in Support re 802 MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record filed by Google Inc.. (Noona, Stephen)

November 21, 2012

802

MOTION to Seal and Redact Portions of Trial Record by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

November 20, 2012

801

CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc., recover of defendant, Google, Inc., the sum of Fifteen Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($15,800,000.00). The Running Royalty Rate is 3.5%.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc., recover of defendant AOL, Inc., the sum of Seven Million Nine Hundred Forty-Three ThousandDollars and 00/100 ($7,943,000.00).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc., recover of defendant IAC Search &Media, Inc., the sum of Six Million Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and 00/100 $6,650,000.00).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. recover of defendant Gannett Co., Inc., the sum of Four Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-TwoDollars and 00/100 ($4,322.00).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc., recover of defendant Target Corp., the sum of Ninety-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Three Dollars and 00/100 ($98,833.00) Form of judgment approved in accordance with Rule 58, FRCivP, July 20,2012. Entered and filed 11/20/12. (Signed by Patrice L. Thompson, Deputy Clerk, on 11/20/12). (ecav)

November 20, 2012

800

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: As outlined in this Memorandum Opinion and Order, a presumption of laches arises in this case, which I/P Engine was unable to rebut. Therefore, I/P Engine is barred from recovering damages from any of the defendants for any infringement occurring before September 15,2011. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 11/20/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/20/12). (ecav, )

November 20, 2012

799

MEMORANDUM ORDER: Having considered the Jury's determinations, the Court finds that the Defendants have failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the '420 Patent or the '664 Patent are obvious. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 11/20/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/20/12). (ecav, )

November 20, 2012

798

ORDER GRANTING 797 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT, 791 NOTICE OF CALCULATION Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT, 791 NOTICE OF CALCULATION. Defendants shall have through and including 11/29/2012 for Responses and Plaintiff shall have through and including 12/7/2012. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 11/20/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/20/12). (ecav, )

November 19, 2012

797

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT, 791 NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

November 13, 2012

796

JURY MEAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/6/12 & filed on 11/7/12. (ptom)

November 9, 2012

795

Declaration re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT of Dawn Rudenko, Esq. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 9, 2012

794

Declaration re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT of Stephen L. Becker, PHD. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 9, 2012

793

Memorandum in Support re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 9, 2012

792

MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 7, 2012

791

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Calculation of Prejudgment Interest (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

November 6, 2012

790

Sealed Document (E-gov Jury Verdict). (ptom) Modified on 11/8/2012 (ptom).

November 6, 2012

789

JURY VERDICT (Redacted). (ptom)

November 6, 2012

788

JURY TRIAL (DAY #15) completed on 11/6/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Frank Ciminio, Jr., W. Ryan Snow, Donald Schultz, and Charles Monterio appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 11/5/12. Court excused jurors to continue their deliberations at 10:04am. Out of the presence of the jury, court and counsel answered questions of the jury. Court ordered jury sequestered for lunch. Jury later returned with a verdict which was read into the record. Jurors excused. Court directed counsel to file any motions in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. Judgment will issue once the Court makes a ruling on obviousness. Court adjourned. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit List, # 2 Witness List) (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom) (Main Document 788 replaced on 11/7/2012) (ptom, ). Modified on 11/7/2012 to add language re: judgment(ptom, ).

November 5, 2012

787

JURY TRIAL (DAY #14) held on 11/5/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Frank Cimino, Jr. Charles Monterio, and W. Ryan Snow, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last Friday 11/2/12. Court excused jurors to continue their deliberations at 9:58am. Outside of the presence of the jury, Court and counsel discussed and answered questions of the jury. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Tuesday, 11/6/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 11/6/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom)

November 5, 2012

786

JURY MEAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/5/12. (ptom)

November 2, 2012

785

JURY MEAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson & filed on 11/2/12. (ptom)

November 2, 2012

784

JURY TRIAL (DAY #13) held on 11/2/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Frank Cimino, Jr., Dawn Rudenko, Charles Monterio, and Donald Schultz, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Robert Wilson, Joshua Sohn, Emily OBrien and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 11/1/12. Court excused jurors to continue their deliberations at 9:43am. Outside of the presence of the jury, Court and counsel discussed and answered questions of the jury. Court ORDERED Jurors sequestered for lunch. Jurors excused and Court adjourned to Monday November 5, 2012 at 10:00am. Jury Trial continued to 11/5/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom)

November 2, 2012

783

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation of Lodging of Demonstratives (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I)(Noona, Stephen)

November 2, 2012

781

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 11-01-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 12/3/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/2/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/31/2013.(borden, sharon) (Main Document 781 replaced on 11/2/2012) (arou, ).

November 1, 2012

782

JURY MEAL ORDER.. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/1/12. (ptom)

November 1, 2012

780

JURY TRIAL (DAY #12) held on 11/1/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Frank Cimino, Jr., Dawn Rudenko, Charles Monterio, and Donald Schultz, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Robert Wilson, Joshua Sohn, Emily OBrien and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Out of the presence of the jury, Court conducted a charge conference off the record. Objections heard on the record. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/31/12. Out of the presence of the jury, Court finds the co-defendants will benefit from Courts previous ruling on Laches. Closing Arguments heard. Court ORDERED Jurors sequestered for lunch. Jury received Courts charge and instructions. Court excused jurors to begin their deliberations at 4:10pm. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Friday, 11/2/12 at 9:30 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 11/2/2012 at 09:30 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom)

November 1, 2012

776

Memorandum in Support re 775 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

November 1, 2012

775

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

November 1, 2012

774

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-31-2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 12/3/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/2/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/30/2013.(borden, sharon) (Main Document 774 replaced on 11/2/2012) (arou, ).

November 1, 2012

773

Memorandum in Support re 772 Second MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Damages filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

November 1, 2012

772

Second MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

November 1, 2012

771

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. Proffer of Evidence Related to Laches (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 PX 176, # 10 PX 408, # 11 PX 409, # 12 PX 410, # 13 PX 411, # 14 PX 412, # 15 PX 413, # 16 PX 414, # 17 PX 415, # 18 PX 416, # 19 PX 417 I, # 20 PX 417 II, # 21 PX 418, # 22 PX 419 I, # 23 PX 419 II, # 24 PX 421, # 25 DX 21, # 26 DX28, # 27 DX 255)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 31, 2012

770

JURY TRIAL (DAY #11) held on 10/31/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Frank Cimino, Jr., and Donald Schultz, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Robert Wilson, Joshua Sohn, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Out of the presence of the jury, Court GRANTS IN PARTS AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs JMOL as to Validity. Court GRANTS Defendants Renewed JMOL of Laches stating findings and rulings on the record. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/30/12. Plaintiff presented rebuttal evidence - witness sworn and testified. Plaintiffs exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Jurors excused until Thursday, 11/1/12 at 10:30 a.m. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendants Motions for a Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Invalidity, as to Non-Infringement, and as to Damages - Argued - Court DENIES JMOLs as to Invalidity and Non-Infringement. Court adjourned until Thursday, 11/1/12 at 9:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 11/1/2012 at 10:30 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom, ) Modified on 11/1/2012 to correct last appearance or jurors(ptom). (Main Document 770 replaced on 11/1/2012) (ptom, ).

October 31, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 706 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Exhibit 1 To The OBrien Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Portions Of Dr. Frieders Second Updated Expert Report. (ecav, )

October 31, 2012

769

Opposition to Plaintiff's (Oral) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Anticipation and Obviousness filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 31, 2012

768

Memorandum in Support re 767 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law Of Laches filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 31, 2012

767

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Defendants Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law Of Laches by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2012

766

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation of Filing of Defendants Proffer Of Evidence Related To Laches (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2012

765

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-30-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 30, 2012

764

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 10, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/30/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(stewart, jody)

October 30, 2012

763

JURY TRIAL (DAY #10) held on 10/30/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Dawn Rudenko, and W. Ryan Snow, appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Emily OBrien, Robert Wilson, Joshua Sohn, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last Friday 10/26/12. Defendants continued presentation of evidence - witness testified. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Out of the presence of the jury, Court GRANTED Defendants #748 MOTION to Exclude And Preclude Plaintiff From Recalling Mr. Kosak As A Rebuttal Witness, stating ruling on the record. Defendants rest. Jurors excused until Wednesday, 10/31/12 at 10:00 a.m. Out of the presence of the jury, Plaintiffs Motions for a Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Validity, as to Damages, and as to Latches - Argued - Court takes matter under advisement. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendants Renewed their Motion for a Judgment as a Matter of Law.Court adjourned until Wednesday, 10/31/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/31/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom)

October 30, 2012

762

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-26-2012 (Morning Session Public Portion), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 30, 2012

761

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-25-2012 (Morning Session Public Portion), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 30, 2012

760

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-24-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 30, 2012

759

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-23-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 30, 2012

758

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-22-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 30, 2012

757

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-19-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 30, 2012

756

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 9, afternoon session, for dates of 10/26/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/31/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2013.(stewart, jody)

October 30, 2012

755

Declaration re 754 Memorandum in Support of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2012

754

Memorandum in Support re 753 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Non-Infringement filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2012

753

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Non-Infringement by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2012

752

Memorandum in Support re 751 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Damages filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2012

751

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Damages by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2012

750

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Plaintiff's Proffer Regarding Proposed Rebuttal Testimony of Donald Kosak (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 30, 2012

749

Brief in Support to 748 MOTION to Exclude And Preclude Plaintiff From Recalling Mr. Kosak As A Rebuttal Witness filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 30, 2012

748

MOTION to Exclude And Preclude Plaintiff From Recalling Mr. Kosak As A Rebuttal Witness by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 26, 2012

747

JURY TRIAL (DAY #9)held on 10/26/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Dawn Rudenko, W. Ryan Snow, Donald Schultz, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, David Bilsker, Emily OBrien, Robert Wilson, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/25/12. Court ORDERED courtroom sealed for proprietary testimony. Defendants continued presentation of evidence-witness sworn and testified. Defendants and Plaintiff exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Out of the presence of the jury, objections heard and rulings made on the record about certain exhibits and testimony. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Monday, 10/29/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/29/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom)

October 26, 2012

746

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 8, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/25/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/26/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/24/2013.(stewart, jody)

October 25, 2012

745

JURY TRIAL (DAY #8) held on 10/25/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Out of the presence of the jury, objections heard and rulings made on the record about certain exhibits and testimony. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/24/12. Court ORDERED courtroom sealed for proprietary testimony. Defendants continued presentation of evidence. Defendants exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Friday, 10/26/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/26/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 745 replaced on 10/26/2012) (ptom, ).

October 25, 2012

744

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 7, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/24/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/26/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/23/2013.(stewart, jody) (Main Document 744 replaced on 11/2/2012) (arou, ).

October 24, 2012

743

JURY TRIAL (DAY #7) held on 10/24/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Dawn Rudenko, Donald Schultz, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien, Stephen Noona, David Bilsker, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendants Motion to Strike Testimony of Dr. Becker - Argued - Court DENIES the Motion. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendant Motion to Strike Certain Testimony of Dr. Becker - Argued - Court to issue a curative jury instruction. Out of the presence of the jury, the Court heard objections to certain exhibits. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/23/12. Plaintiff read interrogatory into the record. Plaintiff rested. Out of the presence of the jury, Defendants Motion for a Judgment as a Matter of Law - Argued - Court DENIED the motion. Defendants presented evidence - witnesses sworn and testified. Plaintiffs Exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Thursday, 10/25/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/25/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 743 replaced on 10/25/2012) (ptom, ).

October 24, 2012

742

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 6, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/23/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/23/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)

October 24, 2012

741

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/22/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/23/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)

October 24, 2012

740

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Plaintiff's Proposed Curative Instructions (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 23, 2012

739

ORDER denying 709 Motion to Strike per ruling of October 17, 2012. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 23, 2012.

October 23, 2012

738

ORDER denying 700 Motion for Reconsideration per ruling on October 16, 2012. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 23, 2012.

October 23, 2012

737

ORDER finding as moot 701 Motion to Expedite per ruling on October 16,2012. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 23, 2012.

October 23, 2012

736

ORDER finding as moot 712 Motion to Expedite. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on october 23, 2012.

October 23, 2012

735

JURY TRIAL (DAY #6) held on 10/23/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Jury Trial set for 10/24/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Dawn Rudenko, and W. Ryan Snow appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, Robert Wilson, Emily OBrien, David Bilsker, and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Matter came on for trial by jury (Day #6). Out of the presence of the jury, Pretrial conference held in chambers. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/22/12. Plaintiff continued presentation of evidence witnesses sworn and testified.Plaintiffs Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Court STRIKES testimony of Dr. Becker, on cross-examination, about purchase/sell agreement of the Disney/Google Patent, based on improper cross-examination on issue. Court to close Courtroom tomorrow, 10/24/12, from 2:30pm - 3:15pm for proprietary testimony. Juror excused and Court adjourned until Wednesday, 10/24/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury trial continued to 10/24/12 at 10:00am in Courtroom #4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson.[Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 735 replaced on 10/24/2012) (ptom). Modified on 10/24/2012 to add language (ptom).

October 23, 2012

734

ORDER granting 724 Motion for David Andrew Perlson to appear Pro hac vice on behalf of AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Entered and filed 10/23/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/23/12). (ecav, )

October 23, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 687 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Order on the Final Pretrial Conference, 684 MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 4 to its Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 22, 2012

733

JURY TRIAL (DAY #5) held on 10/22/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien, Stephen Noona, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Out of the presence of the jury, Pretrial conference held in chambers. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last Friday, 10/19/12. Plaintiff continued presentation of evidence witnesses sworn and testified. Plaintiffs Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Tuesday, 10/23/12 at 9:30 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/23/2012 at 09:30 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 733 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, ).

October 22, 2012

732

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 3, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/18/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/21/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)

October 22, 2012

731

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 2, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/17/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7074. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/21/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)

October 22, 2012

730

TRANSCRIPT of Trial proceedings, Day 1, Afternoon session, for dates of 10/16/2012, before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Jody Stewart, Telephone number 757-222-7071. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/21/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/22/2013.(stewart, jody)

October 19, 2012

729

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-18-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/19/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/17/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 19, 2012

728

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-17-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/19/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/17/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 19, 2012

727

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-16-2012 (Morning Session), before Judge Raymond A. Jackson, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/19/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/17/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 19, 2012

726

JURY TRIAL (DAY #4) held on 10/19/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Stephen Noona, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/18/12. Court ORDERED courtroom sealed for proprietary testimony. Plaintiff continued presentation of evidence witness testified. Plaintiffs Sealed Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Out of the presence of the jury, Court DENIES Defendants Motion to Strike. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Monday, 10/22/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/22/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(ptom) (Main Document 726 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, ).

October 18, 2012

725

JURY TRIAL (DAY #3) held on 10/18/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, Frank Cimino, Jr., Charles Monterio, and W. Ryan Snow appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien and Stephen Noona, appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/17/12. Out of the presence of the jury, pretrial conference held in chambers. Comments of Court and counsel re: sealing of courtroom for testimony on proprietary information. Public notice to be posted. Plaintiff continued presentation of evidence witnesses sworn and testified. Video deposition of Jon Diorio, Gary Holt and Bartholomew Furrow shown to the jury. Plaintiffs Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Court adjourned until Friday, 10/19/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/19/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.).)(ptom) Modified on 10/19/2012 to add pretrial conference (ptom). (Main Document 725 replaced on 10/19/2012) (ptom, ). (Main Document 725 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, )

October 18, 2012

724

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David Andrew Perlson and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3252387. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 18, 2012

723

ORDER granting 721 Motion for Pro hac vice, Appointed Jennifer Lynn Polse for AOL Inc., for Gannett Company, Inc., for Google Inc., for IAC Search & Media, Inc., for Target Corporation. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 10/18/12. (jcow, )

October 18, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal 1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes, 567 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1-3 (ecav, )

October 17, 2012

722

JURY TRIAL (DAY #2) held on 10/17/2012 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, Dawn Rudenko, Donald Schultz, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien, Stephen Noona, David Bilsker, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Petit jurors (9) appeared pursuant to adjournment last evening 10/16/12. Plaintiff presented evidence witnesses sworn and testified. Plaintiffs and Defendants Exhibits introduced and admitted into evidence. Objections heard and rulings made on the record. Video Deposition of Jonathan Alferness shown to the jury. Out of the presence of the jury, Court DENIED Plaintiffs #700 Motion for Reconsideration of 697 Order denying Motion for Sanctions; and DENIED Defendants #709 Motion to Strike and for Sanctions and to Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert report in Violation of the Courts Oct. 9th Order, stating rulings on the record. Jurors excused and Court adjourned until Thursday, 10/18/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.).)(ptom) Modified on 10/18/2012 to add language(ptom). (Main Document 722 replaced on 10/18/2012) (ptom, ). (Main Document 722 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, ).

October 17, 2012

721

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer Lynn Polse and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3250881. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 17, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions;, 524 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 34 and 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judg, 514 MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 2 to its Response to Defendants Motion to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Materials at Trial, 508 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12. (ecav, )

October 16, 2012

720

(DAY #1) Jury Trial Begun and Voir Dire held on 10/16/12 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. Attorneys Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, Dawn Rudenko, Donald Schultz, and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Andrew Perlman, Corporate Representative present. Attorneys David Nelson, David Perlson, Emily OBrien, Stephen Noona, David Bilsker, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of defendants AOL, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation. Pretrial conference held in chambers. Petit jurors were sworn, examined on voir dire and from said panel came a jury of nine (9) who were duly sworn. Jurors not selected excused subject to call. Jurors instructed by Court and shown a video as to patent cases. Out of the presence of the jury, counsel argued objections to demonstrative exhibits - Court stated rulings on the record. Witnesses sequestered. Opening statements of counsel heard. Court adjourned until Wednesday, 10/17/12 at 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial continued to 10/17/2012 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. [Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR (a.m.) and Jody Stewart, OCR (p.m.)](ptom) (Main Document 720 replaced on 10/23/2012) (ptom, ).

October 16, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 453 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #5 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 436 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #1 along with Exhibits 5-6 and 11-12, 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone, 449 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #4 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 457 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker along with Exhibits 1-5, 7-8, and 10-11, 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to, 462 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants Motion to Preclude Dr. Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions along with Exhibits 1-3 and 5, 441 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #2 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 445 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #3 along with Exhibits 3-11. (ecav, )

October 15, 2012

719

ORDER ON FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/15/12. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(arou)

October 15, 2012

718

Sealed Document: Exhibit to 711 Declaration, filed by by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation UNDER SEAL, pursuant to 706 Motion to Seal. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter)(mwin, )

October 15, 2012

717

RESPONSE in Opposition re 709 Emergency MOTION to Strike and For Sanctions and To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of the Courts October 9 Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 15, 2012

MOTION REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to (rsim, )

October 15, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 453 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #5 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 436 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #1 along with Exhibits 5-6 and 11-12, 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone, 449 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #4 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 457 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker along with Exhibits 1-5, 7-8, and 10-11, 462 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants Motion to Preclude Dr. Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions along with Exhibits 1-3 and 5, 441 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #2 along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 445 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #3 along with Exhibits 3-11 (rsim, )

October 15, 2012

716

Opposition to 700 MOTION for Reconsideration re 697 Order on Motion for Sanctions,,,,,,,,,,,,, denial of I/P Engines Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Judge Leonard's Ruling on Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 15, 2012

715

CERTIFICATE of Service (Amended) re 713 Reply to Motion, by Stephen Edward Noona on behalf of AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation (Noona, Stephen)

October 15, 2012

714

CERTIFICATE of Service (Amended) re 710 Memorandum in Support, by Stephen Edward Noona on behalf of AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation (Noona, Stephen)

October 15, 2012

Notice of Correction re 713 Reply to Motion - The filing user has been notified to file a separate Certificate of Service. The certificate of service filed is not signed. (rsim, )

October 15, 2012

Notice of Correction re 710 Memorandum in Support - The filing user has been notified to file a separate Certificate of Service. The certificate of service filed is not signed. (rsim, )

October 14, 2012

713

Reply to Motion re 701 MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for Review of Judge Leonards Ruling on I/P Engines Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 14, 2012

712

Consent MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Consent Motion to Expedite Briefing on Defendants Emergency Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of The Courts October 9 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 14, 2012

711

Declaration re 710 Memorandum in Support, of Emily O'Brien in Support of Defendants Emergency Motion For Sanctions and To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of the Courts October 9 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 14, 2012

710

Memorandum in Support re 709 Emergency MOTION to Strike and For Sanctions and To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of the Courts October 9 Order filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 14, 2012

709

Emergency MOTION to Strike and For Sanctions and To Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Expert Report In Violation Of the Courts October 9 Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 14, 2012

708

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 706 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Exhibit 1 To The OBrien Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Portions Of Dr. Frieders Second Updated Expert Report (Noona, Stephen)

October 14, 2012

707

Memorandum in Support re 706 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Exhibit 1 To The OBrien Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Portions Of Dr. Frieders Second Updated Expert Report filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 14, 2012

706

MOTION to Seal Portions Of Exhibit 1 To The OBrien Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion For Sanctions And To Strike Portions Of Dr. Frieders Second Updated Expert Report by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 12, 2012

705

ORDER NUMBER 2 - PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS: Before the Court are remaining motions to exclude evidence and witnesses from trial in the above-styled matter filed by both Plaintiff and Defendants. These matters have been fully briefed by the Parties. The Court finds that oral arguments of these motions will not aid itsdecisional process. Having reviewed the motions and related materials, the Court finds these matters ripe for judicial determination. For the reasons stated herein, and pursuant to the inherent authority to make evidentiary rulings prior to trial, see Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38,41 n.4(1984), the Court resolves the Parties' motions as outlined: Plaintiffs First Motion in Limine as to Items 2 and 6 is DEFERRED. The Court's reasoning with respect to the Lycos agreements is equally applicable to the seven agreements Defendants wish to offer, which by their own admission are non-comparable, and are again solely offered for the purpose of showing a preference by Google for lump sum royalty payments. Non-comparable licenses cannot be used to determine either the form or amount of a reasonable royalty. Accordingly, for the reasons outlined above and under the Court's discretion under Fed. R. Evid. 403, Plaintiffs Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements between Google and other third parties, as outlined in Plaintiffs memorandum in support of this motion, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Second Motion in Limine to exclude the Google-Meyer Agreement is DENIED. Additionally, the Court's reasoning with respect to the Google-Meyer Agreement is equally applicable to the Google-Disney Agreement. As there is a dispute to whether the technology underlying the Google-Disney Agreements is comparable, the jury must resolve the dispute in the context of determining a reasonable royalty for damages. Consequently, Plaintiffs Second Motion in Limine to exclude the Google-Disney Agreement is DENIED. Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone as to any testimony using a "yardstick" or "proxy" methodology or the use of the real estate valuations analogies in this context. Dr. Ugone is free to present expert opinion using established methods of calculating damages, including the hypothetical negotiation approach guided by the Georgia-Pacific Factors, which he purports to use. Having reviewed the motions and related pleadings, the Court finds that Dr. Ungars new theory of invalidity is not violative of Rule 26 procedures. Furthermore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has neither been surprised nor prejudiced by this new theory under Fourth Circuit precedent on this issue. See Southern States Rack & Fixture, Inc. v. Sherwm-Williams Co., 318 F.3d 592, 597 (4th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion as to Dr. Ungars' new theory of invalidity is DENIED. At Final-Pre Trial Conference, Defendants essentially asked for reconsideration of the Court's previous denial of their Motion in Limine No. 2. Having again reviewed the relevant case law, the Court declines to reconsider its decision. I/P Engine, through its damages expert, is prepared to offer evidence at trial that "patented technology forms a substantial basis of the consumer demand of the accused products" through discovered documents showing increased revenue specifically attributed to patented technologies, presumably reflecting increased consumer demand. The sufficiency of this evidence in determining a reasonable royalty is a question for the jury. If questions arise as to whether Dr. Becker's trial testimony adequately supports application of the Entire Market Value Rule, they can be addressed through cross examination or through relevant trial motions. Accordingly, motion for reconsideration of the Court's previous denial of their Motion in Limine No. 2 is DENIED. Having reviewed the motion and related pleadings, the Court finds that objections to Dr. Becker's testimony are best resolved at trial during the course of examination as they generally go to the weight of the evidence and should be resolved by the jury. In summary: Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Stephen L. Becker (ECF No. 319) is DENIED. DENYING 293 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 299 Motion in Limine; DENYING 319 Motion to Exclude; DENYING 327 Motion to Exclude; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 333 Motion in Limine; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 340 Motion to Exclude; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 357 Motion in Limine, as outlined in this Order. (See Order for entire Specifics) Entered and filed 10/12/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/12/12). (ecav, )

October 12, 2012

704

Defendants' Proposed Pre-Trial Jury Instructions Proposed Jury Instructions by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)

October 12, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua, 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof, 331 MOTION to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements along with Exhibits 1 and 2, 312 MOTION to Seal Exhibit 3 to the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence, 338 MOTION to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (ecav, )

October 12, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. 425 MOTION to Seal its Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment along with Exhibits 8, 11-19, 22-24, 27-32, 34-39, 45, 53-54, 56. (ecav, )

October 11, 2012

703

REPLY to Response to Motion re 293 MOTION to Dismiss all Claims Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 11, 2012

702

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for dates of 10-09-2012, before Judge Lawrence R. Leonard, Court Reporter/Transcriber Sharon Borden, OCR, Telephone number 757-222-7072. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 11/13/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/11/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/9/2013.(borden, sharon)

October 11, 2012

Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller as directed. Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller no longer assigned to the case. (ecav, )

October 10, 2012

701

MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for Review of Judge Leonards Ruling on I/P Engines Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 10, 2012

700

MOTION for Reconsideration re 697 Order on Motion for Sanctions,,,,,,,,,,,,, denial of I/P Engines Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 10, 2012

699

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Filing of Plaintiff's Proposed Verdict Form (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Schultz, Donald)

October 9, 2012

Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller no longer assigned to the case. (ecav, )

October 9, 2012

Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard no longer assigned to the case. (ecav, )

October 9, 2012

698

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to assign any matters which arise in this case to an alternate United States Magistrate Judge due to the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge having conducted a settlement conference and discussions in this matter. Because of the nature of the settlement discussions the undersigned cannot preside over any contested issues in this case. Entered and filed 10/9/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 10/9/12). (ecav, )

October 9, 2012

697

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 277 Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses; AND DENYING its 282 Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses. Specifically, as to the Plaintiffs Second Motion, the Court ORDERS the Defendants to produce to the Plaintiff within two days of entry of this Order data that has not been produced as to Google, Inc.'s, revenues for its properties based in the United States and AUTHORIZES the Plaintiff to supplement the report of its damages expert, Dr. Stephen L. Becker, within two days thereafter. Furthermore, the Defendants may not cross-examine Dr. Becker on the omission in his initial report of Google, Inc.'s, revenues for its properties based in the United States. Although the Court DENIES the Plaintiff's Second Motion as to certain e-mails and information provided therein produced by the Defendants as Bates Nos. G-IPE-0888897,G-IPE-0888898-99, G-IPE-0888900, and G-IPE-888901-02, the Plaintiff is AUTHORIZED to supplement Dr. Becker's report to include these documents by Friday, October 12,2012. Finally, the Court DENIES the Plaintiffs Second Motion as to the Defendants' non-infringing alternatives contentions but AUTHORIZES the Plaintiff to supplement the report of its infringement expert, Dr. Ophir Frieder, to include these contentions by Friday, October 12, 2012. (See Order for All Specifics) Entered and filed 10/9/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 10/9/12). (ecav, )

October 9, 2012

696

Proposed Voir Dire by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)

October 9, 2012

695

Proposed Jury Instructions by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Snow, W. Ryan)

October 9, 2012

Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson:Final Pretrial Conference held on 10/9/2012. Attorney's Kenneth Brothers, Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, Dawn Rudenko and Frank Cimino, Jr. appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. Attorney's David Nelson, David Pearlson, Emily O'Brien, Stephen Noona, David Bilsker, and Robert Wilson appeared on behalf of the defendant's. (ptom)

October 9, 2012

694

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation of Filing Defendants' Proposed Verdict Form (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 9, 2012

693

Defendants' Proposed Jury Instructions by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 9, 2012

692

Proposed Voir Dire by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 9, 2012

691

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard:Motion Hearing held on 10/9/2012 re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc., 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. Present were Jeffrey Sherwood, W. Ryan Snow, Frank Cimino, Jr. and Kenneth Brothers on behalf of the plaintiff and David Bilsker, David Perlson, Steve Noona and David Nelson on behalf of the defendants. Mr. Sherwood argues motion #277 and Mr. Bilsker responds. The Court makes rulings on the record. Mr. Cimino argues motion #282 and Mr. Perlson responds. The Court makes rulings on the record. The Court will enter an order in this matter. Parties adjourn to participate in a settlement conference with Judge Leonard in this case and a final pretrial conference later in the afternoon with Judge Jackson. Court adjourned. (Court Reporter Sharon Borden, OCR.)(cdod, )

October 9, 2012

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard:Settlement Conference held on 10/9/2012. (cdod, )

October 9, 2012

690

ORDER, AGREED, re. 202 Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice of I/P Engine's Claims Relating to AOL's Advertising.com Sponsored Listings by AOL, I/P Engine, Inc. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that I/P Engine's claims for relief against AOL relating to AOL's Advertising.com Sponsored Listings are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys' fees, costs of court and expenses relating to the dismissed claims shall be borne by each party incurring the same. Entered and filed 10/9/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/9/12). (ecav, )

October 8, 2012

689

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 687 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Order on the Final Pretrial Conference (Noona, Stephen)

October 8, 2012

688

Memorandum in Support re 687 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Order on the Final Pretrial Conference filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 8, 2012

687

MOTION to Seal Portions of the Order on the Final Pretrial Conference by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 5, 2012

686

Opposition to 293 MOTION to Dismiss all Claims Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 5, 2012

685

Memorandum in Support re 684 MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 4 to its Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Target Corporation filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 5, 2012

684

MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 4 to its Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Target Corporation by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 5, 2012

683

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Exhibits 1 and 4 to its Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Target Corporation (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 5, 2012

682

ORDER on three (3) Motions in Limine filed by I/P Engine, Inc. ("Plaintiff") toexclude evidence from trial in the above-styled matter. Also before the Court are five (5) Motions in Limine to exclude evidence filed by Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., Target Corporation, IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Gannett Co., Inc. ("Defendants"). These matters have been fully briefed by the Parties. The Court finds that oral arguments of these motions will not aid its decisional process. Having reviewed the motions and related materials, the Courtfinds these matters ripe for judicial determination. For the reasons stated herein, and pursuant to the inherent authority to make evidentiary rulings prior to trial, see Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38,41 n.4 (1984), the Court resolves the Parties' Motions in Limine as outlined: DEFERRING ruling on 299 Motion in Limine; DENYING 301 Motion in Limine; DEFERRING ruling on 303 Motion in Limine; DEFERRING ruling on 305 Motion in Limine; DENYING 307 Motion in Limine; GRANTING AND DEFERRING (See Order for specifics as to each item) 314 Motion in Limine; DEFERRING ruling on 333 Motion in Limine; DENYING 335 Motion in Limine, as outlined in this Order. (See Order for all Specifics as to each Motion in Limine) Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

681

ORDER granting 654 Motion for Pro hac vice appearance. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 5, 2012.

October 5, 2012

680

ORDER granting 672 Motion for Pro hac vice appearance. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on October 5, 2012.

October 5, 2012

679

ORDER GRANTING 582 Motion for David Leon Bilsker to appear asPro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

678

ORDER GRANTING 643 Motion for Margaret Pirnie Kammerud to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

677

ORDER GRANTING 642 Motion for Jennifer Jasmine Ghaussy to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

676

ORDER GRANTING 641 Motion for Howard Yeh-hao Chen to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

675

ORDER GRANTING 640 Motion for Antonio Ricardo Sistos to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

674

ORDER GRANTING 639 Motion for Joshua Lee Sohn to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

673

ORDER GRANTING 638 Motion for Sarah Agudo to appear as Pro hac vice for AOL Inc. Entered and filed 10/5/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/12). (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

672

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David Aaron Nelson and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3235417. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 5, 2012

671

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 651 Reply to Motion re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 2, # 2 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 2)(ecav, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/5/2012: # 3 Letter) (ecav, ).

October 5, 2012

670

Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply re 651 Reply to Motion re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

669

Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply re 651 Reply to Motion re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

October 5, 2012

668

MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 5, 2012

667

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 664 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations , Notice of Filing of Additional Exhibit to the Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 5, 2012

666

Declaration re 665 Memorandum in Support of Emily O'Brien in Support of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations by IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Noona, Stephen)

October 5, 2012

665

Memorandum in Support re 664 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 5, 2012

664

MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Deposition Designations by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 5, 2012

Notice of Correction re 660 Stipulation. Counsel filed a pleading titled, "Stipulation and Proposed Order Withdrawing Certain Motions in Limine Pending before the Court". Proposed Orders have to be sent to the Clerk's Office in paper and not filed electronically as a pleading. If counsel's intent is to withdraw the motions that are stated in Doc. 660, a Motion to Withdraw is all that is needed, linking same back to the pertinent motions and the Stipulation is not necessary. (ecav, )

October 4, 2012

660

STIPULATION and Proposed Order Withdrawing Certain Motions in Limine Pending Before the Court by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 4, 2012

659

NOTICE of Appearance by Craig Crandall Reilly on behalf of Suffolk Technologies, LLC (Reilly, Craig)

October 4, 2012

658

Brief in Support to 657 Opposition filed by Suffolk Technologies, LLC. (Reilly, Craig)

October 4, 2012

657

Opposition to 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial filed by Suffolk Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Reilly, Craig)

October 4, 2012

656

Request for Hearing by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial (Noona, Stephen)

October 4, 2012

655

REPLY to Response to Motion re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 4, 2012

654

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Emily Christina O'Brien and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233922. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 4, 2012

651

Reply to Motion re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 4, 2012

649

Memorandum in Support re 647 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions along with Exhibits 1 and 2 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 4, 2012

647

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions along with Exhibits 1 and 2 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 4, 2012

646

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 4, 2012

644

Reply to Motion re 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 4, 2012

643

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Margaret Pirnie Kammerud and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233082. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 4, 2012

642

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer Jasmine Ghaussy and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233079. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 4, 2012

641

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Howard Yeh-hao Chen and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233062. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 4, 2012

640

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Antonio Ricardo Sistos and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233056. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 4, 2012

639

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua Lee Sohn and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233047. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 4, 2012

638

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Sarah Agudo and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3233036. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

663

Sealed Defendants' Reply Brief in Support re 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(ecav, )

October 3, 2012

662

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes. (ecav, )

October 3, 2012

661

Sealed Defendants' Reply Brief in Support to Exclude Testimony re 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal 1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes. (ecav, )

October 3, 2012

653

Cover Letter re 652 Sealed Document, 645 Sealed Document, 648 Sealed Document, 650 Sealed Document. (ecav, )

October 3, 2012

652

Sealed Exhibit 3 re 569 Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

October 3, 2012

650

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 569 Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

October 3, 2012

648

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 569 Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (ecav, )

October 3, 2012

645

Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of Its Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone re 569 Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

October 3, 2012

609

Reply to Motion re 357 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 3, 2012

608

Response to 115 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Seal Exhibits 15, 16, 17, 18, and 21 of IP Engine's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc.'s Custodial Document Production, 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 15 (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 16 (Lesser Redacted), # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 17 (Lesser Redacted), # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 18 (Unredacted, Public Form), # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 21 (Lesser Redacted), # 6 Exhibit ECF 125 (Lesser Redacted), # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 11 (Lesser Redacted), # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 12 (Lesser Redacted), # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 15 (Lesser Redacted), # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 22 (Lesser Redacted))(Schultz, Donald)

October 3, 2012

607

Response to 241 NOTICE,, 234 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration o Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 4 (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit 5 (Lesser Redacted), # 3 Exhibit 6 (Lesser Redacted), # 4 Exhibit 7 (Lesser Redacted), # 5 Exhibit 8 (Lesser Redacted), # 6 Exhibit 9 (to Remain Under Seal), # 7 Exhibit 21 (Lesser Redacted), # 8 Exhibit 22 (Lesser Redacted), # 9 Exhibit 26 (Lesser Redacted), # 10 Exhibit 27 (Lesser Redacted), # 11 Exhibit 28 (Lesser Redacted), # 12 Exhibit 29 (Lesser Redacted), # 13 Exhibit 30 (Lesser Redacted), # 14 Exhibit Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Lesser Redacted, # 15 Exhibit Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow (Less Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

606

Response to 206 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Google Inc.s Brief In Support Of Motion To Compel And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Jen Ghaussy in Support Thereof Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit H (Undreacted, Public Form), # 2 Exhibit I (Unredacted, Public Form), # 3 Exhibit L (Unredacted, Public Form), # 4 Exhibit M (Unredacted, Public Form), # 5 Exhibit N (Unredacted, Public Form), # 6 Exhibit P (Unredacted, Public Form), # 7 Exhibit Q (Unredacted, Public Form), # 8 Exhibit R (Unredacted, Public Form), # 9 Exhibit S (Undredacted, Public Form), # 10 Exhibit T (Unredacted, Public Form), # 11 Exhibit U (Unredacted, Public Form))(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

604

Response to 234 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration o Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Unredacted, Public Form))(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

602

Response to 226 MOTION to Seal Portions of Google Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Reply Brief in Support of the Motion to Compel (Unredacted, Public Form))(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

600

Response to 214 MOTION to Seal Motion To Seal Portions Of Defendants Brief In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Discovery Sanctions And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Emily OBrien In Support Thereof Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit M to the Declaration of Emily O'Brien (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit N to the Declaration of Emily O'Brien (Lesser, # 3 Exhibit Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (Lesser Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

594

Response to 206 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Google Inc.s Brief In Support Of Motion To Compel And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Jen Ghaussy in Support Thereof Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit B (Lesser Redacted), # 3 Exhibit C (Lesser Redacted), # 4 Exhibit J (Lesser Redacted), # 5 Exhibit K (Lesser Redacted), # 6 Exhibit Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Compel (Lesser Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

591

Response to 181 MOTION to Seal Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(1) Depositions MOTION to Seal Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(1) Depositions Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portsions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(1) Depositions (Lesser Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

590

Response to 136 MOTION to Seal Portions of Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Compel and Exhibits AA and BB to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of the Reply Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit AA (Lesser Redacted), # 2 Exhibit BB (Lesser Redacted), # 3 Exhibit Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Compel (Lesser Redacted))(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

Reset Hearings: Final Pretrial Conference reset for 10/9/2012 at 02:30 PM in Norfolk Courtroom 4 before District Judge Raymond A. Jackson. (ptom)

October 3, 2012

585

Response to 244 Order,,,,, 245 Order,,,,,,,,,, Joint Response to the Orders to Show Cause filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

582

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David Leon Bilsker and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3231446. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 3, 2012

573

Settlement Conference Order: This case has been referred to the undersigned for a settlement conference. In order to facilitate the just and expeditious resolution of this case, it is ORDERED as follows: All parties and their lead counsel are required to appear at a settlement conference scheduled in the United States District Court, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, at10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, October 9, 2012, for the purpose of conducting discussions, in good faith, towards a compromised resolution of this case. Counsel must notify parties attending the settlement conference that electronic equipment (cell phones, pagers, laptops, etc.) is not permitted in the courthouse without the express permission of the Court. (See Order for further specifics) Additionally, The parties must: Submit a brief memorandum of five pages or less directly to the chambers of the undersigned (do not file in the clerk's office) by noon on Friday, October 5, 2012. Do not serve a copy of the letter on the opposing party unless you wish to disclose your settlement position. The memorandum can be faxed to (757) 222-7257. Identify the lawyers and party representatives who will attend the conference. (See Order for further specifics) Entered and filed 10/3/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 10/3/12). (ecav, )

October 3, 2012

Set Hearings: Settlement Conference set for 10/9/2012 at 10:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (cdod, )

October 3, 2012

572

ORDER DENYING Defendants' 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. It is further ORDERED that parties engage in settlement discussions before United States Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard @ 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, 10/9/12. Entered and filed 10/3/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/3/12). (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

637

Cover Letter re. Docs. 613 - 636. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

636

Sealed Exhibit 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn re 524 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 34 and 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

635

Sealed Exhibit 34 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn re 524 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 34 and 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

634

Sealed Defendants' Reply in Support re 524 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 34 and 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement. (ecav)

October 2, 2012

633

Sealed Exhibit Q re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

632

Sealed Exhibit P to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

631

Sealed Exhibit O to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

630

Sealed Exhibit N to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

629

Sealed Exhibit M to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

628

Sealed Exhibit L to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav)

October 2, 2012

627

Sealed Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

626

Sealed Exhibit K re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

625

Sealed Exhibit J re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

624

Sealed Exhibit I re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

623

Sealed Exhibit G re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

622

Sealed Exhibit E re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

621

Sealed Exhibit D re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

620

Sealed Exhibit C re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

619

Sealed Exhibit B re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

618

Sealed Exhibit A re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

617

Sealed Defendants' Opposition re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

616

Sealed Defendants' Opposition re 518 Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

615

Sealed Exhibit 12 re 508 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 to. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

614

Sealed Exhibit 10 re 508 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 to. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

613

Sealed Defendants' Opposition re Plaintiff's 508 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

612

Cover Letter re 610 Sealed Document, 611 Sealed Document,. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

611

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 516 Response to Motion re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 2, # 2 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 2)(ecav, )

October 2, 2012

610

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 516 Response to Motion re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

571

Declaration re 570 Reply to Response to Motion,, of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I)(Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

570

REPLY to Response to Motion re 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

569

Reply to Motion re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 2, 2012

568

Memorandum in Support re 567 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1-3 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 2, 2012

567

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1-3 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 2, 2012

566

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of its Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1-3 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 2, 2012

565

Declaration re 564 Reply to Response to Motion of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of their Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 18)(Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

564

REPLY to Response to Motion re 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

563

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

562

Memorandum in Support re 561 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

561

MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect; (2) Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of their Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker; and (3) Portions of Exhibit I to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of their Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

560

Request for Hearing by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect, 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker, 307 MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation, 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

554

Request for Hearing by I/P Engine, Inc. re 335 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion in Limine to Exclude Improper Prior Art Evidence, 357 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction, 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone (Schultz, Donald)

October 2, 2012

547

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses, 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses Notice of Hearing (Schultz, Donald)

October 2, 2012

541

ORDER, AGREED, GRANTING 470 Joint Motion to Amend/Correct 90 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order. Entered and filed 10/2/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 10/2/12). (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Judge Leonard. 470 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 90 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order. (ecav, )

October 2, 2012

Set Deadlines as to 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses, 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses. Motion Hearing set for 10/9/2012 at 09:30 AM in Norfolk Mag Courtroom 1 before Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (cdod, )

October 2, 2012

529

Request for Hearing by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation on Motion for Summary Judgment (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

528

Declaration re 527 Reply to Response to Motion, of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 34, # 2 Exhibit 35, # 3 Exhibit 36, # 4 Exhibit 37, # 5 Exhibit 38)(Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

527

REPLY to Response to Motion re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

526

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 524 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 34 and 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judg (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

525

Memorandum in Support re 524 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 34 and 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judg filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 2, 2012

524

MOTION to Seal Portions of the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 34 and 36 to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

523

Declaration re 521 Opposition, of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions (Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit L, # 2 Exhibit M, # 3 Exhibit N, # 4 Exhibit O, # 5 Exhibit P, # 6 Exhibit Q, # 7 Exhibit R)(Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

522

Declaration re 520 Opposition, of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K)(Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

521

Opposition to 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

520

Opposition to 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

519

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

518

Memorandum in Support re 517 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

517

MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (2) Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (3) Portions of the Declaration of Margaret Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions; (4) Portions of Exhibits A-E, G, I-K to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions; and (5) Exhibits L-Q to the Declaration of Margaret Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

516

RESPONSE to Motion re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 1, 2012

515

Memorandum in Support re 514 MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 2 to its Response to Defendants Motion to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Materials at Trial filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 1, 2012

514

MOTION to Seal Exhibits 1 and 2 to its Response to Defendants Motion to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Materials at Trial by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 1, 2012

513

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Exhibits 1 and 2 to its Response to Defendants Motion to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Materials at Trial (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

October 1, 2012

512

Declaration re 511 Opposition, of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13)(Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

511

Opposition to 357 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

510

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 508 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t (Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

509

Memorandum in Support re 508 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 t filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

October 1, 2012

508

MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction and (2) Exhibits 10 and 12 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungar's New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 28, 2012

605

Sealed Exhibit 6 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 6, # 2 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 6)(ecav, )

September 28, 2012

603

Sealed Exhibit 7 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

601

Sealed Exhibit 8 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

599

Sealed Exhibit 9 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

598

Sealed Exhibit 10 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc.(ecav, )

September 28, 2012

597

Sealed Exhibit 11 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

596

Sealed Opposition to Defendants' re 455 Opposition to 307 MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

595

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 455 Opposition to 307 MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

593

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 455 Opposition to 307 MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

592

Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Brief in Opposition re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

589

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

588

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 2)(ecav, )

September 28, 2012

587

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

586

Sealed Exhibit 3 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

584

Sealed Exhibit 4 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

583

Sealed Exhibit 5 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

581

Sealed Exhibit 7 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

580

Sealed Exhibit 8 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

579

Sealed Exhibit 10 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

578

Sealed Exhibit 11 re 460 Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

577

Sealed Document re 464 Opposition to 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

576

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 464 Opposition to 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

575

Sealed Exhibit 3 re 464 Opposition to 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

574

Sealed Exhibit 5 re 464 Opposition to 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

559

Sealed Cover Letter received on 9/28/12.

September 28, 2012

558

Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s 451 Opposition to 305 MOTION in Limine #4 to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence or Argument Relating to Defendants' Conduct During Discovery or to Google's Unproduced Licenses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

557

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 451 Opposition to 305 MOTION in Limine #4 to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence or Argument Relating to Defendants' Conduct During Discovery or to Google's Unproduced Licenses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

556

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 451 Opposition to 305 MOTION in Limine #4 to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence or Argument Relating to Defendants' Conduct During Discovery or to Google's Unproduced Licenses filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

555

Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s re 439 Opposition to 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

553

Sealed Exhibit 5 re 439 Opposition to 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

552

Sealed Exhibit 6 re 439 Opposition to 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

551

Sealed Exhibit 11 re 439 Opposition to 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

550

Sealed Exhibit 12 re 439 Opposition to 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

549

Sealed I/P Engine, Inc.'s 443 Opposition to 301 MOTION in Limine #2 to Exclude Evidence of Entire Market Value of Accused Products and of Defendants' Size, Wealth and Overall Revenues filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

548

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 443 Opposition to 301 MOTION in Limine #2 to Exclude Evidence of Entire Market Value of Accused Products and of Defendants' Size, Wealth and Overall Revenues filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

546

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 443 Opposition to 301 MOTION in Limine #2 to Exclude Evidence of Entire Market Value of Accused Products and of Defendants' Size, Wealth and Overall Revenues filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

545

Sealed Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

544

Sealed Exhibit 3 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

543

Sealed Exhibit 4 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

542

Sealed Exhibit 5 re 447 Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 5, # 2 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 5)(ecav, )

September 28, 2012

540

Sealed Cover Letter re 530 Sealed Document, 537 Sealed Document,,, 538 Sealed Document,,, 536 Sealed Document,,, 535 Sealed Document, 534 Sealed Document, 539 Sealed Document,,, 533 Sealed Document, 531 Sealed Document, 532 Sealed Document. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

539

Sealed Exhibit K re Defendants' 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

538

Sealed Exhibit E re Defendants' 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

537

Sealed Defendants' Opposition re 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

536

Sealed Defendants' Opposition re 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal(1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

535

Sealed Exhibit E re Defendants' 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

534

Sealed Exhibit D re Defendants' 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit D)(ecav, )

September 28, 2012

533

Sealed Exhibit C re Defendants' 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

532

Sealed Exhibit B re Defendants' 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

531

Sealed Exhibit A re Defendants' 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

530

Sealed Memorandum in Support of Defendants' 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (ecav, )

September 28, 2012

470

Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 90 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order by Defendants and by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Schultz, Donald)

September 28, 2012

469

ORDER, AGREED, To Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal: Granting in part and Denying in part 115 Motion to Seal; Granting in part and Denying in part 125 Motion to Seal; Granting 136 Motion to Seal; Granting 181 Motion to Seal; Granting in part and Denying in part 206 Motion to Seal; Granting 214 Motion to Seal; Denying 226 Motion to Seal; Granting in part and Denying in part 234 Motion to Seal; Granting in part and Denying in part 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that the following documents be maintained under seal in full: ECF No. 125 - Exhibits 14,18 and 21 to the Plaintiffs Motion to Seal. ECF Nos. 234-41 - Exhibits 9 and 25 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further ORDERED that portions of the following documents be maintained under seal in connection with the motions they support: ECF No. 115 - Exhibits 15,16,17, and 21 to the Plaintiffs Motion to Seal. ECF No. 125 - Exhibits 11,12,15, and 22 to Plaintiffs Motion to Seal, and I/P Engine'sBrief in Opposition to Google, and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement Its Infringement Contentions. ECF No. 136 - Exhibits AA and BB to Defendants' Motion to Seal, and the Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Compel.ECF No. 181 - Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support ofDefendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(l) Depositions. ECF No. 206 - Exhibits A, B, C, J, K, and the Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Compel. ECF No. 214 - Exhibits M and N to the Declaration of Emily O'Brien in Support of the Motion to Seal Portions of Defendants Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Discovery Sanctions, and the Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions. ECF Nos. 234-41 - Exhibits 4, 5, 6,7, 8,9,21,22,26, 27,28,29, and 30 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment,the Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow in Support of Defendants" Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following documents be unsealed in connection with the motions they support: ECF No. 115 - Exhibit 18 to the Plaintiffs Motion to Seal. ECF No. 206 - Exhibits H, I, L, M, N, P, Q, R, S, T, and U. ECF No. 226 - The Reply Brief in Support of the Motion to Compel. ECF Nos. 234-41 - Exhibit 31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. In addition to above, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO FILE THEIR JOINT RESPONSE TO THE ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE AND NON-CONFIDENTIAL EXHIBITS, PROFFERED IN CAMERA ON 9/24/12, VIA CM/ECF WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. Entered and filed 9/28/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/28/12). (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

507

Sealed Cover Letter re 477 Sealed Document, 496 Sealed Document, 480 Sealed Document, 487 Sealed Document, 475 Sealed Document, 503 Sealed Document, 497 Sealed Document, 502 Sealed Document, 505 Sealed Document, 473 Sealed Document, 479 Sealed Document, 492 Sealed Document, 471 Sealed Document, 490 Sealed Document, 485 Sealed Document, 504 Sealed Document, 472 Sealed Document, 491 Sealed Document, 494 Sealed Document, 500 Sealed Document, 482 Sealed Document, 476 Sealed Document, 478 Sealed Document, 499 Sealed Document, 493 Sealed Document, 483 Sealed Document, 498 Sealed Document, 495 Sealed Document, 488 Sealed Document, 501 Sealed Document, 481 Sealed Document, 489 Sealed Document, 484 Sealed Document, 474 Sealed Document, 486 Sealed Document, 506 Sealed Document. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

506

Sealed Exhibit 56 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

505

Sealed Exhibit 54 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

504

Sealed Exhibit 53 I/P Engine, Inc.'s re 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

503

Sealed Exhibit 45 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

502

Sealed Exhibit 39 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

501

Sealed Exhibit 38 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

500

Sealed Exhibit 37 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

499

Sealed Exhibit 36 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

498

Sealed Exhibit 35 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

497

Sealed Exhibit 34 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

496

Sealed Exhibit 32 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # 1 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 32, # 2 Continuation of Sealed Exhibit 32)(ecav, )

September 27, 2012

495

Sealed Exhibit 31 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # 1 Sealed Exhibit 31 Continuation, # 2 Sealed Exhibit 31 Continuation)(ecav, )

September 27, 2012

494

Sealed Exhibit 30 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Attachments: Continuation of Exhibit 30.(ecav, )

September 27, 2012

493

Sealed Exhibit 29 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

492

Sealed Exhibit 28 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

491

Sealed Exhibit 27 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

490

Sealed Exhibit 24 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

489

Sealed Exhibit 23 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

488

Sealed Exhibit 22 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

487

Sealed Exhibit 19 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

486

Sealed Exhibit 18 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

485

Sealed Exhibit 17 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

484

Sealed Exhibit 16 re I/P Engine Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

483

Sealed Exhibit 15 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

482

Sealed Exhibit 14 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

481

Sealed Exhibit 13 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

480

Sealed Exhibit 12 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

479

Sealed Exhibit 11 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

478

Sealed Exhibit 8 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

477

Sealed Exhibit 7 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendant's 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

476

Sealed Exhibit 6 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

475

Sealed Exhibit 5 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

474

Sealed Exhibit 4 re. I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 27, 2012

473

Sealed Exhibit 3 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav)

September 27, 2012

472

Sealed Exhibit 2 re I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav)

September 27, 2012

471

Sealed Document I/P Engine, Inc.'s 427 Opposition to Defendants' 237 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav)

September 27, 2012

468

Declaration re 466 Memorandum in Support, of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

467

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

466

Memorandum in Support re 465 MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

465

MOTION to Seal Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

464

Opposition to 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

463

Memorandum in Support re 462 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants Motion to Preclude Dr. Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions along with Exhibits 1-3 and 5 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

462

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants Motion to Preclude Dr. Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions along with Exhibits 1-3 and 5 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

461

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants Motion to Preclude Dr. Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions along with Exhibits 1-3 and 5 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

460

Opposition to 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

459

Opposition to 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

458

Memorandum in Support re 457 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker along with Exhibits 1-5, 7-8, and 10-11 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

457

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker along with Exhibits 1-5, 7-8, and 10-11 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

456

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker along with Exhibits 1-5, 7-8, and 10-11 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

455

Opposition to 307 MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

454

Memorandum in Support re 453 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #5 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

453

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #5 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

452

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #5 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

451

Opposition to 305 MOTION in Limine #4 to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence or Argument Relating to Defendants' Conduct During Discovery or to Google's Unproduced Licenses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

450

Memorandum in Support re 449 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #4 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

449

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #4 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

448

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #4 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

447

Opposition to 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

446

Memorandum in Support re 445 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #3 along with Exhibits 3-11 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

445

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #3 along with Exhibits 3-11 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

444

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #3 along with Exhibits 3-11 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

443

Opposition to 301 MOTION in Limine #2 to Exclude Evidence of Entire Market Value of Accused Products and of Defendants' Size, Wealth and Overall Revenues filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

442

Memorandum in Support re 441 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #2 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

441

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #2 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

440

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #2 along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

439

Opposition to 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

438

Declaration re 433 Opposition, 432 Opposition, 434 Opposition, of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M)(Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

437

Memorandum in Support re 436 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #1 along with Exhibits 5-6 and 11-12 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

436

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #1 along with Exhibits 5-6 and 11-12 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

435

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine #1 along with Exhibits 5-6 and 11-12 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 27, 2012

434

Opposition to 335 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion in Limine to Exclude Improper Prior Art Evidence filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

433

Opposition to 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

432

Opposition to 314 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

431

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

430

Memorandum in Support re 429 MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

429

MOTION to Seal (1) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence; (2) Portions of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff I/P Engine's Second Motion in Limine to Preclude License Agreements, and (3) Exhibits E and K to the Declaration of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 27, 2012

428

ORDER, AGREED re. 412 Motion to Amend/Correct Motion 346 to Close the Courtroom. The Scheduling Order is modified as follows: 1. Scheduling Order is hereby modified to include the following deadlines for the briefing of Defendants' Motion to Close Courtroom (Dkt. No. 346): Plaintiff shall file its response to the Defendants' Motion to Close Courtroom on or before October 1,2012; and Defendant shall file its Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to CloseCourtroom on or before October 4,2012.2. Modification of the Scheduling Order shall not adjust the other dates set forth in the Scheduling Order, including, without limitation, the trial date. Entered and filed 9/27/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/27/12). (ecav, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/27/2012: # 1 Letter) (ecav, ).

September 26, 2012

427

Opposition to 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2-8 (Filed Under Seal), # 3 Exhibit 9, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11-19 (Filed Under Seal), # 6 Exhibit 20, # 7 Exhibit 21, # 8 Exhibit 22-24 (Filed Under Seal), # 9 Exhibit 25, # 10 Exhibit 26, # 11 Exhibit 27-32 (Filed Under Seal), # 12 Exhibit 33, # 13 Exhibit 34-39 (Filed Under Seal), # 14 Exhibit 40, # 15 Exhibit 41, # 16 Exhibit 42, # 17 Exhibit 43, # 18 Exhibit 44, # 19 Exhibit 45 (Filed Under Seal), # 20 Exhibit 46, # 21 Exhibit 47, # 22 Exhibit 48, # 23 Exhibit 49, # 24 Exhibit 50, # 25 Exhibit 51, # 26 Exhibit 52, # 27 Exhibit 53-54 (Filed Under Seal), # 28 Exhibit 55, # 29 Exhibit 56 (Filed Under Seal))(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 26, 2012

426

Memorandum in Support re 425 MOTION to Seal its Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment along with Exhibits 8, 11-19, 22-24, 27-32, 34-39, 45, 53-54, 56 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 26, 2012

425

MOTION to Seal its Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment along with Exhibits 8, 11-19, 22-24, 27-32, 34-39, 45, 53-54, 56 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 26, 2012

424

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal its Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment along with Exhibits 8, 11-19, 22-24, 27-32, 34-39, 45, 53-54, 56 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 26, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: F. Bradford Stillman. 412 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial Joint Motion and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion To Amend/Modify Scheduling Order to Provide BriefJoint MOTION to Amend/Correct 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial Joint Motion and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion To Amend/Modify Scheduling Order to Provide Brief (ecav, )

September 25, 2012

423

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 357 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction by I/P Engine, Inc. (ecav)

September 25, 2012

422

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (ecav, )

September 25, 2012

421

Sealed Exhibit 1 re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (ecav, ) (ecav, ).

September 25, 2012

420

Sealed Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone. (ecav, )

September 25, 2012

419

Sealed Exhibit 2 re 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements. (ecav, )

September 25, 2012

418

Sealed Exhibit 1 re. 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements. (ecav)

September 25, 2012

417

Sealed Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements. (ecav, )

September 25, 2012

416

Sealed Exhibit 3 re. Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s First 314 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence. (ecav)

September 25, 2012

415

Sealed Opposition to Google and IAC's 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(ecav, )

September 25, 2012

414

Sealed Declaration of Michael Hochberg in Support of Plaintiff's and Defendants' 343 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Declaration of Michael Hochberg in Support of Plaintiff's and Defendants' Motions to Seal. (ecav, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/26/2012: # 1 Letter) (ecav, ).

September 25, 2012

413

MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite Briefing on Motion to Dismiss ((Dkt. No. 293)) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 25, 2012

412

Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial Joint Motion and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion To Amend/Modify Scheduling Order to Provide Briefing Schedule for Motion to Seal and Close Courtroom (Dkt. No. 346) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

411

Sealed Letter re 406 Sealed Document, 408 Sealed Document, 410 Sealed Document, 409 Sealed Document, 404 Sealed Document, 407 Sealed Document, 405 Sealed Document,. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

410

Sealed Exhibit 22 re 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

409

Sealed Exhibit 21 re 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

408

Sealed Exhibit 18 re 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

407

Sealed Exhibit 15 re. 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

406

Sealed Exhibit 14 re. 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

405

Sealed Exhibit 12 re 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

404

Sealed Exhibit 11 re 125 MOTION to Seal Motion to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

403

Sealed Letter re 324 MOTION to Seal >Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect, 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua, 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

402

Sealed Declaration of Nicholas Fox in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav)

September 24, 2012

401

Sealed Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

400

Sealed Exhibit 15 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

399

Sealed Exhibit 14 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

398

Sealed Exhibit 13 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

397

Sealed Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

396

Sealed to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

395

Sealed to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

394

Sealed Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

393

Sealed Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

392

Sealed Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

391

Sealed Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

390

Sealed Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

389

Sealed Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

388

Sealed Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

387

Sealed Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

386

Sealed Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

385

Sealed Memorandum in Support of Defendants' 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

384

Sealed Exhibit J to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

383

Sealed Exhibit I to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

382

Sealed Exhibit H to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

381

Sealed Exhibit F to the Declaration of Josuan L. Sohn in Support of 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

380

Sealed Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine 3 re 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

379

Sealed Exhibit H to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' 324 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

378

Sealed Exhibit G to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' 324 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

377

Sealed Exhibit B to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' 324 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

376

Sealed Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendant's 324 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

375

Sealed Defendants' Memorandum in Support of 324 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect. (ecav, )

September 24, 2012

358

Memorandum in Support re 357 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Redacted), # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 24, 2012

357

MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 24, 2012

356

Memorandum in Support re 355 MOTION to Seal Exhibit 1 to its Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 24, 2012

355

MOTION to Seal Exhibit 1 to its Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 24, 2012

354

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Exhibit 1 to its Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engines Daubert Motion, and Fourth Motion in Limine, to Exclude Lyle Ungars New Theory of Invalidity and Opinions Regarding Claim Construction (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 24, 2012

353

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial of Filing of Exhibit 1 (Proposed Order) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

352

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial (Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

351

Declaration re 347 Memorandum in Support, of James Maccoun in Support of Defendants' Motion to Seal by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

350

Declaration re 347 Memorandum in Support, of Danielle Romain in Support of Defendants' Motion to Seal by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

349

Declaration re 347 Memorandum in Support, of Michael Hochberg in Support of Plaintiff's and Defendants' Motions to Seal (Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

348

Declaration re 347 Memorandum in Support, of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Motion to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

347

Memorandum in Support re 346 MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

346

MOTION to Seal Documents and Close the Courtroom During Presentation of Confidential Material at Trial by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

345

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 343 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Declaration of Michael Hochberg in Support of Plaintiff's and Defendants' Motions to Seal (Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

344

Memorandum in Support re 343 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Declaration of Michael Hochberg in Support of Plaintiff's and Defendants' Motions to Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 24, 2012

343

MOTION to Seal Portions of the Declaration of Michael Hochberg in Support of Plaintiff's and Defendants' Motions to Seal by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

374

Sealed Letter re 372 Sealed Document, 371 Sealed Document, 368 Sealed Document, 373 Sealed Document, 369 Sealed Document, 370 Sealed Document. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

373

Sealed Exhibit 7 re THIRD 285 MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 7 Part 2)(ecav, )

September 21, 2012

372

Sealed Exhibit 6 re THIRD 285 MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

371

Sealed Exhibit 5 re THIRD 285 MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

370

Sealed Exhibit 4 re THIRD 285 MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

369

Sealed Exhibit 1 re THIRD 285 MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

368

Sealed Memorandum in Support of THIRD 285 MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

367

Sealed Cover Letter re 359 Sealed Document, 342 Sealed Document, 366 Sealed Document, 363 Sealed Document, 365 Sealed Document, 361 Sealed Document, 364 Sealed Document, 362 Sealed Document, 360 Sealed Document. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

366

Sealed Exhibit 14 re SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

365

Sealed Exhibit 13 re SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

364

Sealed Exhibit 9 re SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

363

Sealed Exhibit 8 re SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

362

Sealed Exhibit 7 re SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

361

Sealed Exhibit 5 re SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

360

Sealed Exhibit 4 re SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav)

September 21, 2012

359

Sealed Exhibit 2 re SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav)

September 21, 2012

342

Sealed Memorandum in Support of SECOND 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support. (ecav)

September 21, 2012

341

Memorandum in Support re 340 MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

340

MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

339

Memorandum in Support re 338 MOTION to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1 and 2 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

338

MOTION to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keith R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1 and 2 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

337

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Keither R. Ugone along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

336

Memorandum in Support re 335 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion in Limine to Exclude Improper Prior Art Evidence filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

335

MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion in Limine to Exclude Improper Prior Art Evidence by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

334

Memorandum in Support re 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

333

MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

332

Memorandum in Support re 331 MOTION to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements along with Exhibits 1 and 2 filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

331

MOTION to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements along with Exhibits 1 and 2 by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

330

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements along with Exhibits 1 and 2 (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

329

Declaration re 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect of Jennifer Ghaussy by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

328

Memorandum in Support re 327 MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

327

MOTION to Exclude (Preclude) Dr. Ophir Frieder From Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

326

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 324 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorr (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

325

Memorandum in Support re 324 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorr filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

324

MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude Dr. Ophir Frieder from Testifying Regarding Untimely Opinions that were Not Disclosed in his Original Expert Report and Opinions that he Now Concedes are Incorrect, and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

323

Declaration re 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker of Emily C. O'Brien by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

322

Declaration re 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker of Bartholomew Furrow (Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

321

Declaration re 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker of Nicholas Fox (Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

320

Memorandum in Support re 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

319

MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

318

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

317

Memorandum in Support re 316 MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

316

MOTION to Seal Portions of Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Testimony from Stephen L. Becker and Certain Materials Filed in Support Thereof by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

315

Memorandum in Support re 314 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

314

MOTION in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

313

Memorandum in Support re 312 MOTION to Seal Exhibit 3 to the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

312

MOTION to Seal Exhibit 3 to the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

311

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. of Motion to Seal Exhibit 3 to the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine's First Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

310

Declaration re 307 MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation, 301 MOTION in Limine #2 to Exclude Evidence of Entire Market Value of Accused Products and of Defendants' Size, Wealth and Overall Revenues, 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, 305 MOTION in Limine #4 to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence or Argument Relating to Defendants' Conduct During Discovery or to Google's Unproduced Licenses, 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Motions in Limine by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

309

Memorandum in Support re 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

308

Memorandum in Support re 307 MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

307

MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

306

Memorandum in Support re 305 MOTION in Limine #4 to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence or Argument Relating to Defendants' Conduct During Discovery or to Google's Unproduced Licenses filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

305

MOTION in Limine #4 to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence or Argument Relating to Defendants' Conduct During Discovery or to Google's Unproduced Licenses by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

304

Memorandum in Support re 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate (Public Version) filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

303

MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

302

Memorandum in Support re 301 MOTION in Limine #2 to Exclude Evidence of Entire Market Value of Accused Products and of Defendants' Size, Wealth and Overall Revenues filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

301

MOTION in Limine #2 to Exclude Evidence of Entire Market Value of Accused Products and of Defendants' Size, Wealth and Overall Revenues by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

300

Memorandum in Support re 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

299

MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

298

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

297

Memorandum in Support re 296 MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

296

MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Matters Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, and Exhibits F, H, I and J to the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of the Defendants' Various Motions in Limine by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

295

Declaration re 294 Memorandum in Support, of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

294

Memorandum in Support re 293 MOTION to Dismiss all Claims Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

293

MOTION to Dismiss all Claims Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 21, 2012

292

TRANSCRIPT HEARING ON MOTIONS for date of 09-18-2012, before Judge F. Bradford Stillman, Court Reporter/Transcriber Gloria Smith, Telephone number 757-222-7074. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter/transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 10/22/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/21/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/20/2012.(smith, gloria)

September 21, 2012

291

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 287 Motion to Expedite Briefing Schedule. The two underlying motions for discovery sanctions were filed the same day (ECF No. 277, 282). The defendants shall file responsive briefs to the plaintiff's motions for discovery sanctions (ECF Nos. 277, 282) on or before October 1, 2012. The plaintiff shall file its rebuttal briefs, if any, on or before 5:00 p.m. on October 4, 2012. A courtesy copy of the briefs and any exhibits, including those submitted for filing under seal, shall be delivered to the chambers of the Honorable Raymond A. Jackson, United StatesDistrict Judge, and to the United States Magistrate Judge co-assignedto this case no later than 9:00 a.m. the morning after filing via CM/ECF. Entered and filed 9/21/12. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/21/12. (ecav, )

September 21, 2012

290

ORDER, AGREED on 276 Joint Motion to Amend/Correct Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order. Modifications of the Scheduling Order the pretrial process and shall not adjust the other dates set forth in the Scheduling Order, including, without limitation, the trial date. (See Order for Specifics and Modifications). Entered and filed 9/21/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/21/12). (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (ecav)

September 21, 2012

289

MOTION to Seal [CORRECTED MOTION] Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

288

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 283 Memorandum in Support, [CORRECTED NOTICE] of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

287

MOTION to Expedite Motion and Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Shorten Defendants' Time to Respond to I/P Engine's Second and Third Motions for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

286

Memorandum in Support re 285 MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

285

MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

284

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 283 Memorandum in Support, of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, in support (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

283

Memorandum in Support re 282 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

282

MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

281

Memorandum in Support re 280 MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

280

MOTION to Seal Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

279

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 278 Memorandum in Support,, of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

278

Memorandum in Support re 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

277

MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

September 21, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: F. Bradford Stillman. 276 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 90 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 90 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (ecav, )

September 20, 2012

276

Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 90 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 18, 2012

275

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 200 Motion for Discovery Sanctions, as stated on the record at the Motions Hearing on 9/18/12; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendant Google Inc.'s 209 Motion to Compel, with respect to relief to four categories of documents contained within the original motion that are DENIED as MOOT, as outlined in this Order. Within three days of the date of this Order, the plaintiff shall produce certain documents provided to potential investors by Innovate/Protect, Inc., the plaintiff's parent company, to the defendant with financial information redacted, as stated on the record at the Motions Hearing held on 9/18/12. The parties shall each bear their own expenses with respect to these motions. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 9/18/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/18/12). (ecav, )

September 18, 2012

274

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman:Motion Hearing held on 9/18/2012 re 209 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff To Produce Documents filed by Google Inc., 200 MOTION for Sanctions Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Disclosed Prior Art filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. Present on behalf of the plaintiffs were Donald Schultz, Kenneth Brothers and Jeffrey Sherwood. Steve Noona and David Perlson were present on behalf of the defendants. Mr. Sherwood argued the motion for sanctions and Mr. Perlson responded. The Court made rulings on the record. The motion was DENIED. The parties then moved on to the motion to compel. The parties had previously resolved some of the issues in the motion. Mr. Perlson argued the motion and Mr. Sherwood responded. The Court made rulings on the record. The Court then inquired as to the pending motions to seal in the case. The parties were directed to submit to chambers an agreed order regarding the sealing of documents in the case by Monday, September 24, 2012 at noon. The Court will enter an order with regard to the two motions that were argued in open court. Court adjourned. (Court Reporter Gloria Smith, OCR.)(cdod, )

September 18, 2012

273

ORDER granting 272 Motion for Pro hac vice appearance. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on September 18, 2012. (Jackson, Raymond) Modified on 9/18/2012 to link gavel order to corrected Pro Hac Vice Order 272 filed by counsel as outlined in the Notice of Correction done by clerk on 9/18/12. Doc 272 took the place of Doc. 268 (ecav).

September 18, 2012

272

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by James Ryerson and Certification of Local Counsel Donald C. Schultz Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3208296. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Schultz, Donald)

September 18, 2012

271

ORDER granting 267 Motion for Pro hac vice appearance. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on September 18, 2012.

September 18, 2012

270

ORDER granting 249 Motion for Pro hac vice appearance. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on September 18, 2012.

September 18, 2012

Notice of Correction re 268 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by James Ryerson and Certification of Local Counsel Donald C. Schultz Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3206773. Pro Hac Vice Motion does not contain the following: Bar Identification Number, applicants signature and signature of counsel. Clerk is removing Doc. 268 form the docket text and counsel is to refile completed Pro Hac Vic Motion. (ecav, )

September 18, 2012

269

ORDER GRANTING 247 Motion and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Sanctions, filed by the defendants on September 14, 2012. ECF No. 247.For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. The Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Sanctions (ECF No. 247 attach. 1) and the Declaration of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Sanctions (ECF No. 247 attach. 2) shall be DEEMED FILED. Entered and filed 9/18/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/18/12). (ecav, )

September 17, 2012

268

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by James Ryerson and Certification of Local Counsel Donald C. Schultz Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3206773. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Schultz, Donald)

September 17, 2012

267

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Katie Scott and Certification of Local Counsel Donald C. Schultz Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3205772. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Schultz, Donald)

September 15, 2012

249

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Robert Wilson and Certification of Local Counsel Steohen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3204766. by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 14, 2012

248

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation Notice Pursuant To 35 U.S.C. § 282 (Noona, Stephen)

September 14, 2012

247

MOTION for Leave to File and Memorandum In Support of Motion For Leave To File Supplemental Brief In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Discovery Sanctions and Declaration Of Joshua L. Sohn In Support Of Defendants Supplemental Brief In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Discovery Sanctions by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Noona, Stephen)

September 13, 2012

266

Sealed Exhibit 31 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

265

Sealed Exhibit 30 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

264

Sealed Exhibit 29 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

263

Sealed Exhibit 28 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

262

Sealed Exhibit 27 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

261

Sealed Exhibit 26 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

260

Sealed Exhibit 25 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

259

Sealed Exhibit 22 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

258

Sealed Exhibit 21 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

257

Sealed Exhibit 9 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

256

Sealed Exhibit 8 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

255

Sealed Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

254

Sealed Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

253

Sealed Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

252

Sealed Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Howard Chen re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav)

September 13, 2012

251

Sealed Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment (ecav)

September 13, 2012

250

Sealed Memorandum in Support re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ecav (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/17/2012: # 1 Letter) (ecav, ).

September 13, 2012

246

ORDER, AGREED. GRANTING 243 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order in this matter, as outlined in this Order. Entered and filed 9/13/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/13/12). (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

245

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 226 MOTION to Seal Portions of Google Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents filed by Google Inc., 214 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Defendants Brief In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Discovery Sanctions And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Emily OBrien In Support Thereof filed by Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc., 181 MOTION to Seal Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(1) Depositions MOTION to Seal Exhibit P to the Declaration of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take 30(b)(1) Depositions filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc., 136 MOTION to Seal Portions of Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Compel and Exhibits AA and BB to the Declaration of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of the Reply filed by Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., 125 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Opposition to Google and IAC's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions Along with Exhibits 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, and 22 in Support filed by I/P Engine, Inc., 115 MOTION to Seal I/P Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Seal Exhibits 15, 16, 17, 18, and 21 of IP Engine's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc.'s Custodial Document Production filed by I/P Engine, Inc., 206 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Google Inc.s Brief In Support Of Motion To Compel And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Jen Ghaussy in Support Thereof filed by Google Inc. Accordingly, the Court will ORDER the parties to SHOW CAUSE why the specified materials should not be unsealed and filed in the public record. As outlined in this Order, the Court ORDERS the parties to SHOW CAUSE why the materials described above should not be unsealed and filed in the public record. The parties are DIRECTED to appear before the Court on 9/18/12, at 12:00 noon to identify, on the record, any and all reasons why these materials should be filed under seal rather than in the public record of this case. The Court notes that a hearing on certain discovery motions in this case is already scheduled for that date and time. In the interim, the Clerk shall continue to maintain the materials under seal. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 9/13/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/13/12). (ecav, )

September 13, 2012

244

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 234 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on 9/12/12, by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. As outlined in this Order, the Court finds the stated basis for sealing these materilas to be manifestly insufficient to justify filing of these materials under seal. Accordingly, the Court will ORDER the parties to SHOW CAUSE why the specified materials should not be unsealed and filed in the public record. The parties are DIRECTED to appear before the Court on 9/18/12, at 12:00 noon to identify, on the record, any and all reasons why these materials should be filed under seal rather than in the public record of this case, as outlined in this order. The Court notes that a hearing on certain discovery motions in this case is already scheduled for that date and time. IN the interim, the Clerk shall continue to maintain the materials under seal (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 9/13/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 9/13/12). (ecav)

September 12, 2012

243

Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 90 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order by Defendants and by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Schultz, Donald)

September 12, 2012

242

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 236 NOTICE, 235 Memorandum in Support, 234 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration o of Filing of Amended Certificates of Service (Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

241

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 238 Memorandum in Support, of Filing of Additional Exhibits to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 17, # 2 Exhibit 18, # 3 Exhibit 19, # 4 Exhibit 20, # 5 Exhibit 21, # 6 Exhibit 22, # 7 Exhibit 23, # 8 Exhibit 24, # 9 Exhibit 25, # 10 Exhibit 26, # 11 Exhibit 27, # 12 Exhibit 28, # 13 Exhibit 29, # 14 Exhibit 30, # 15 Exhibit 31, # 16 Exhibit 32, # 17 Exhibit 33)(Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

240

Declaration re 238 Memorandum in Support, of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16)(Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

239

Declaration re 238 Memorandum in Support, of Bartholomew Furrow in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Public Version) by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

238

Memorandum in Support re 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

237

MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

236

NOTICE by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 234 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration o (Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

235

Memorandum in Support re 234 MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration o filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

234

MOTION to Seal Portions of the Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits 4-9, 21-22, and 25-31 to the Declaration of Howard Chen in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and the Declaration of Bartholomew Furrow in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 12, 2012

Motion Hearing (#200, 209) set for 9/18/2012 at 12:00 PM in Norfolk Mag Courtroom 1 before Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman. (lwoo)

September 11, 2012

Telephone Conference held on 9/11/2012 held before Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman. (lwoo)

September 11, 2012

233

ORDER granting 231 Motion for Pro hac vice. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on September 11, 2012.

September 10, 2012

Reset Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 9/11/2012 at 11:30 AM in Newport News Chambers before Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman. (lwoo)

September 7, 2012

Reset Hearings (time corrected): Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/5/2012 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman. (ptom)

September 5, 2012

232

Sealed Reply Brief in Support of Google's 209 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff To Produce Documents. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(ecav, )

September 5, 2012

231

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David A. Nelson and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3188423. by Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2012

230

Declaration re 229 Reply to Response to Motion of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Google's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents by Google Inc.. (Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2012

229

REPLY to Response to Motion re 209 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff To Produce Documents (Public Version) filed by Google Inc.. (Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2012

228

NOTICE by Google Inc. re 226 MOTION to Seal Portions of Google Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents (Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2012

227

Memorandum in Support re 226 MOTION to Seal Portions of Google Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents filed by Google Inc.. (Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2012

226

MOTION to Seal Portions of Google Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

September 4, 2012

Reset Telephone Conference for 9/11/2012 at 11:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman. (lwoo)

September 4, 2012

225

ORDER granting 224 Motion for Extension of Page Limit for Breiefing Summary Judgemnt Motion. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on September 4, 2012. )

September 4, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: F. Bradford Stillman. 214 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Defendants Brief In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Discovery Sanctions And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Emily OBrien In Support Thereof. (ecav, )

August 30, 2012

Set Deadlines/Hearings Telephone Conference set for 9/6/2012 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman. (afor, )

August 30, 2012

Set Deadlines/Hearings Telephone Conference set for 8/30/2012 at 02:30 PM in Newport News Chambers before Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller. (afor, )

August 29, 2012

224

Consent MOTION for Extension and Memorandum in Support of Consent Motion for Extension of Page Limit for Briefing Summary Judgment Motion by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

August 28, 2012

223

Opposition to 209 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff To Produce Documents filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 24, 2012

MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: F. Bradford Stillman. 200 MOTION for Sanctions for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Disclosed Prior Art, by I/P Engine, INc. (ecav, )

August 23, 2012

222

Reply to Motion re 200 MOTION for Sanctions Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Disclosed Prior Art filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

August 22, 2012

221

ORDER granting 219 Motion for Sarah Agudo to appear Pro hac vice for Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Entered and filed 8/22/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/22/12). (ecav, )

August 20, 2012

220

Sealed Opposition to Plaintiff's 200 MOTION for Sanctions Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Disclosed Prior Art. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit M, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Letter)(ecav, )

August 20, 2012

219

Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Sarah Agudo and Certification of Local Counsel Stephen E. Noona Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3167771. by Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

August 17, 2012

218

Declaration re 217 Opposition Of Emily O'Brien In Support Of Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Discovery Sanctions by Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P)(Noona, Stephen)

August 17, 2012

217

Opposition to 200 MOTION for Sanctions Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Disclosed Prior Art (Public Version) filed by Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

August 17, 2012

216

NOTICE by Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation re 214 MOTION to Seal Motion To Seal Portions Of Defendants Brief In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Discovery Sanctions And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Emily OBrien In Support Thereof (Noona, Stephen)

August 17, 2012

215

Memorandum in Support re 214 MOTION to Seal Motion To Seal Portions Of Defendants Brief In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Discovery Sanctions And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Emily OBrien In Support Thereof filed by Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

August 17, 2012

214

MOTION to Seal Motion To Seal Portions Of Defendants Brief In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Discovery Sanctions And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Emily OBrien In Support Thereof by Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)

August 16, 2012

212

MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 175 Motion for Reconsideration in Part of the Court's Claim Construction Order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the term "collaborative feedback data" as it appears in Claims 10 and 25 of the '420 patent be defined as "data from system users with similar interests or needs regarding what informons such users found to be relevant." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the meaning of the term "[feedback system for] receiving information found to be relevant to the query by other users" is apparent from the claim language itself. (See Order for Specifics) Entered and filed 8/16/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/16/12). (ecav, )

August 15, 2012

213

Sealed Brief in Support of Defendants' 209 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff To Produce Documents. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit H, # 5 Exhibit I, # 6 Exhibit J, # 7 Exhibit K, # 8 Exhibit L, # 9 Exhibit M, # 10 Exhibit N Part 1, # 11 Exhibit N Part 2, # 12 Exhibit N Part 3, # 13 Exhibit P, # 14 Exhibit Q, # 15 Exhibit R, # 16 Exhibit S, # 17 Exhibit T, # 18 Exhibit U)(ecav, )

August 14, 2012

I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Docket Report