Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Franchini v. Bangor Publishing Co., Inc., et al
as 23-1633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS C. FRANCHINI
Defendant / Appellee:
BANGOR PUBLISHING CO., INC., d/b/a Bangor Daily News, MEG HASKELL, EDWARD MURPHY and others
Defendant:
BLETHEN MAINE NEWSPAPERS, INC., d/b/a Portland Press Herald and SALLY PIPES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Buechler et al v. Gannett Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
James Buechler and Greta Edwards
Defendant:
Gannett Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04299
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Doe v. Volokh
as 22-1525
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Intervenor:
EUGENE VOLOKH
Defendant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LISBON, NH
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATED PRESS, BOSTON GLOBE MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC, CALIFORNIANS AWARE and others
Belozerov v. Gannett Company, Inc.
as 4:2022cv10838
Plaintiff:
Serge Belozerov
Defendant:
Gannett Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Belozerov v. Gannett Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10838
Plaintiff:
Serge Belozerov
Defendant:
Gannett Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cable News Network, Inc., et alIn re: Cable News Network, Inc., et al
as 22-3012
In Re:
In re: Cable News Network, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., d/b/a ABC News, Associated Press and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.