Rudolph v. Pierce County et al
Brandon Neil Rudolph |
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer, Mastandrea, Smith, Desmond, Maldonado, Severson, Kim, Peck and Buchanan |
3:2023cv05856 |
September 20, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Benjamin H Settle |
S Kate Vaughan |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REQUEST for Extension to Obtain Prison Trust Account Statement by Plaintiff Brandon Neil Rudolph (CR) |
Filing 5 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Brandon Neil Rudolph against defendant(s) Buchanan, Byrer, Desmond, Kim, Maldonado, Mastandrea, NaphCare, Peck, Pierce County, Severson, Smith with JURY DEMAND (CR) |
![]() |
Filing 3 STRIKEN MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Plaintiff Brandon Neil Rudolph. Noting Date 10/13/2023, (CR) Modified on 10/18/2023 strike entry per #4 Order (CR). |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Application. ***Action Required*** Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 10/23/2023 to correct IFP application (CR) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION To Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Brandon Neil Rudolph. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint) (CR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.