Cases 1 - 10 of 2,951
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Blankenship v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Evan William Blankenship
Defendant:
Ricky T. Buchanan, H. Helms and A. Scearse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Buchanan
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis (ID 107555) v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
(fnu) Smith and Jennell L. Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford #695732 v. Buchanan
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ford #695732
Defendant:
Brenda Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Ziegler et al
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Eric Ramon Buchanan
Defendant:
Casey Ziegler, Mathew Sychia, Mathew Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
