Cases 1 - 10 of 64
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUCHANAN v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
G. BUCHANAN
Defendant:
A. ALSIP, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, C. COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHANAN v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00564
Petitioner:
DANIEL R. BUCHANAN
Respondent:
VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchanan v. Wendy et al
as 3:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
Bryant Buchanan
Defendant:
Wendy, St Joseph County Jail, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHANAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
KELLY RENE BUCHANAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Flores v. East Chicago City of et al
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Eriberto Flores
Defendant:
East Chicago City of, East Chicago Police Department, Hector Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUCHANAN v. ZATECKY
as 1:2022cv02483
Plaintiff:
GERALD BUCHANAN
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUCHANAN v. PORTER et al
as 2:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BUCHANAN
Defendant:
Ms. PORTER, SNYDER, FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Allen County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Donald Buchanan
Defendant:
Allen County Jail, HNC Medical Personel and Mental Health Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. USA
as 1:2022cv00080
Petitioner:
Brandon Buchanan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
