Hancock v. Rickard et al
| Gary Warren Hancock, Jr. |
| Barbara Rickard, Sawyers, Norris, Saunders, Walters, Nowlin, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 |
| 1:2018cv00024 |
| February 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| McDowell |
| Omar J. Aboulhosn |
| David A. Faber |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court OVERRULES plaintiff's 100 Objections except for Objection 1 which was sustained. The court SUSTAINS defendants' 99 Objection on the issue of exhaustion of plaintiff's FTCA claim. With these e xceptions, the court ADOPTS the 98 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn; GRANTS defendants' 83 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment; DISMISSES this action; and directs the Clerk to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 3/30/2020. (cc: plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Having reviewed the 51 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn, the court hereby DENIES petitioner's 5 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. This matter shall remain referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn for further proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 9/19/2018. (cc: plaintiff, pro se, counsel of record and any unrepresented party) (arb)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: In order to enable the court to evaluate Hancock's entitlement to injunctive relief, the court believes a response by defendants (who have access to plaintiff's medical records) is necessary. Once defendants ha ve filed a written response addressing the allegations listed above, the court will determine whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. For this reason, plaintiff's objections are SUSTAINED insofar as the court will further evaluate his alleg ations regarding inadequate medical care. His objections are OVERRULED in all other respects. The court RECOMMITS this matter to Magistrate Judge Abhoulhosn to further evaluate Hancock's entitlement to injunctive relief with respect to the denial of Metamucil. Terminated: 12 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 4/19/2018. (cc: plaintiff, pro se, counsel of record and Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn) (arb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
