Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03748
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Escobar et al v. Walter E. Nelson Co. et al
as 3:2026cv02447
Defendant:
Does 1-20, Walter E. Nelson Co. of Western Washington and Walter E. Nelson Co.
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanchez Sop and Maria Yac Escobar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09149
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Timothy Coles v. Joseph Walters
as 26-7187
Respondent:
JOSEPH WALTERS, Director, VADOC
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY LEE COLES
Cary v. Ruddy et al
as 1:2026cv03268
Defendant:
Mario Orlando, Lackawanna Medical Armored, Tim Betti and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Tyler Cary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 2:2026cv00484
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Sean Walter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Walters v. Judy et al
as 1:2026cv03252
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Katie Adam, P. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Preston W. Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carbajal et al v. JB & SS Transports Corp et al
as 1:2026cv07076
Defendant:
JORGE BLANCO and JB&SS TRANSPORTS CORP
Plaintiff:
TERESA AMELIA PAJARES ZULOAGA and WALTER EDSON CARBAJAL CARBAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07035
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
