Weems-Bey v. FCI McDowell
| Adrian Weems-Bey |
| FCI McDowell |
| 1:2018cv01538 |
| December 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| David A Faber |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Adrian Weems-Bey. System updated to FTC, Oklahoma. (mk)
|
|
Filing 10
LETTER RESPONSE to Adrian Weems-Bey, from Clerk, U.S. District Court, SDWV, dated 1/15/2019, providing exhibits requested. (mk)
|
|
Filing 9
DOCUMENTATION in further support of #1 Complaint. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits) (mk)
|
|
Filing 8
DOCUMENTATION in further support of #4 MOTION by Adrian Weems-Bey for Appointment of Counsel (mk)
|
|
Filing 7
APPLICATION by Adrian Weems-Bey to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (mk)
|
|
Filing 6
LETTER RESPONSE to Adrian Weems-Bey, from Clerk, USDC, dated 1/7/2019, enclosing a file stamped copy of his #5 Documentation in Support of Complaint (with attachments) and civil docket sheet. (arb)
|
|
Filing 5
DOCUMENTATION in Support of #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope mistakenly mailed to McDowell County Magistrate Court, #3 Envelope from McDowell County Magistrate Court returning Plaintiff's paperwork, #4 Envelope from current filing) (arb)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Adrian Weems-Bey for Appointment of Counsle [sic]. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (arb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re: Plaintiff's #1 Letter-Form Complaint: Plaintiff shall either pay the filing and administrative fee totaling $400 or file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by 2/4/2019. Plaintiff has until 2/4/2019 to amend his Complaint to specifically set forth his constitutional claims and state specific facts as to how each defendant violated his constitutional rights. Failure to comply with the aforementioned directives will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this matter without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/2/2019. (cc w/form Complaint and a blank Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis: Plaintiff, pro se) (arb)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. (mk)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge David A. Faber. (ts)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Weems-Bey v. FCI McDowell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adrian Weems-Bey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FCI McDowell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
