Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Kashika Speed v. Kevin Thompson
as 24-6236
Plaintiff:
KASHIKA SPEED
Defendant:
KEVIN THOMPSON, Health Services Administrator, FCI McDowell, RN WALTON, and and WARDEN C. MARUKA, FCI McDowell
Stutler v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
FCI McDowell and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stutler v. FCI McDowell
as 3:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez-Verduzco v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez-Verduzco
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Eason v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02396
Petitioner:
Marcus Lamont Eason
Defendant:
Warden Bowers
Respondent:
Warden of FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lyvers v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Kashajuan Lyvers
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Capers v. FCI McDowell Warden
as 1:2023cv00297
Petitioner:
Christopher Capers
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Barrington Miller
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gilbert v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
Wallace D. Gilbert
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morales v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00177
Petitioner:
Ramon Morales
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
