Stanley v. Astrue
Sidney Lee Stanley |
Michael J. Astrue |
2:2009cv00821 |
July 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
David A. Faber |
Mary E. Stanley |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g RSI Tax Suits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the court OVERRULES the defendant's objection to Magistrate Judge Stanley's Proposed Findings and Recommendation, adopts the 15 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and DENIES defendant's 8 MOTION to Dismiss.Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 12/1/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (tmh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stanley v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sidney Lee Stanley | |
Represented By: | Carter Zerbe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Represented By: | Michael McGaughran |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.