Walls v. Astrue
Ronald Ray Walls, Sr. |
Michael J. Astrue |
2:2009cv01006 |
September 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
David A. Faber |
Mary E. Stanley |
None |
77 U.S.C. ยง 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 JUDGMENT ORDER consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this same day, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner; remanding the case for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); directing the Clerk to remove this matter from the court's docket. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 1/31/2011. (cc: attys) (tmh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Walls v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ronald Ray Walls, Sr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.