Balis v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Earl Balis, II
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2010cv01304
Filed: November 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge to the extent consistent with this opinion; overrulling plaintiff's 15 OBJECTION to the PF&R; dismissing plaintiff's 2 Complaint, and removing this case from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/30/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Balis v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earl Balis, II
Represented By: Michael G. Miskowiec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?