Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Carolyn Jones
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Covidien Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00114
Filed: February 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph R. Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 389 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER For the reasons discussed herein, Defendant C. R. Bard, Inc.'s 372 Motion in Limine to Exclude Bobby Orr's Mesh Development Memoranda is denied. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 1/3/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ras)
November 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 361 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Protective Order and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Deposition of Dr. Farmer) granting 356 EMERGENCY MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. for Protective Order and denying 358 EMERGENCY MOTION by Carolyn Jones for Leave to Take the Deposition of Stephen Farmer, M.D. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 11/13/2013. (cc: counsel of record) (skh)
August 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 340 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion to Stay or Alternatively to Certify for Immediate Interlocutory Appeal) denying 338 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Stay or Alternatively to Certify for Immediate Interlocutory Appeal. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/22/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skh)
July 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 333 ORDER (Plaintiff's Motion to Remove Case from Group One Bellwether Trial Pool)denying with the limitations described herein 309 MOTION by Carolyn Jones to Remove Case from Group One Bellwether Trial Pool. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/9/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skh)
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 321 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Parties' Motions in Limine) granting Plaintiffs' 279 Motion in Limine No. 1 - 510(K) Clearance of the Avaulta Products by the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), or Lack of FDA Enfor cement Action; denying Plaintiffs' 280 Motion in Limine No. 2 - Surgical Consent Forms; granting in part and denying in part Bard's 283 Motion in Limine No. 24 and denying Bard's remaining motions in limine; denying Bard's 318 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/27/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skh)
June 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 300 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration) plaintiffs' 291 Motion for Reconsideration is granted in part as to Dr. El-Ghannam and Dr. Klosterhalfen and denied in part as to Dr. Ostergard. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/14/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skh)
June 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 290 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motions) granting 102 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Denniz Zolnoun, MD, MPH; granting 108 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Exclude the Testimony and Opinions of Dean Al tenhofen, M.D.; granting 111 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Bob Shull, M.D.; granting 114 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Timothy J. Loving, Ph.D. and Janell L. Carroll, Ph.D.; granting in part and denying in part 105 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Arnold Lentnek, M.D.; granting in part and denying in part 117 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Pla intiffs' Treating Physicians; granting in part and denying in part 121 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Bernd Klosterhalfen, M.D.; granting in part and denying in part 124 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to L imit the Opinions and Testimony of Lennox Hoyte, M.D.; granting in part and denying in part 127 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of David A. Kessler, M.D.; granting in part and denying in part 139 MOTION by C. R. Bar d, Inc. to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Anthony B. Brennan, Ph.D; granting in part and denying in part 142 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Ahmed El-Ghannam, Ph.D.; granting in part and denying in part [1 65] MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Julia E. Babensee, Ph.D.; granting in part and denying in part 261 MOTION by Carolyn Jones to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Marta Villaraga, Ph.D. and Maureen Reitman, Sc.D. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/4/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skh)
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 266 ORDER (Bard's Motion for Protective Order to Seal) the 251 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. for Protective Order to Seal is Denied as to Exhibit B and taken under advisement as to Exhibit A. By 5/22/2013, Bard is directed to submit to the court' ;s law clerk via email (1) a chart with the identifying information for each exhibit identified in Exhibit B (to the extent exhibits are used in duplicate pleadings, each exhibit must have a separate entry) and (2) a copy of the exhibit for each entr y on the chart. By 5/24/2013, Bard is directed to file a chart as outlined herein, along with a set of newly dedesignated or redacted exhibits, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/17/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skh)
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 254 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Take Supplemental Deposition Of Roger Darois and the Deposition of Dan Lafever) granting in part and denying in part 189 MOTION by Carolyn Jones for Leave to Take the Supplemental D eposition of Roger Darois and the Deposition of Dan LaFever. Plaintiffs may take the supplemental deposition of Mr. Darois, but may not depose Mr. LaFever. Granting Plaintiffs' motion for leave to reopen discovery for the limited purpose of deposing Mr. Darois on the email communications. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/2/2013. (cc: counsel of record) (skh)
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 212 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Protective Order) granting in part and denying in part 145 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. for Entry of Protective Order as outlined herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 4/22/2013. (cc: attys) (skh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Covidien Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Jones
Represented By: Martin Daniel Crump
Represented By: Mark W. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?