Tamburo v. Hall et al
| Stephen J. Tamburo, III |
| Scott Hall, William Kincaid, Brian Greenwood, Jonathan Frame, Paul Perry, David Ballard and James Rubenstein |
| 2:2013cv01537 |
| January 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Marshall |
| Thomas E. Johnston |
| Mary E. Stanley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Defendants Hall, Kincaid, Greenwood, Frame, and Perry, are dismissed from this action. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/19/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmr)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to plaintiff's 2 complaint, adopting the 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; dismissing as moot plaintiff's claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, and dismissing plaintiff's cla ims for monetary relief insofar as those claims are asserted against the defendants in their official capacities; directing that this case remain referred to the current Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for the purpose of conducting all remaining proceedings in accordance with the Court's 5 September 2, 2010 Standing Order. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 5/28/2013. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
