Green v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Janet Green |
| C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited |
| 2:2013cv30766 |
| December 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
200
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment) The 48 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Janet Green and Francis Green Whose Claims are Governed by Missouri Law is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the plaintiffs' claims for manufacturing defect, breach of implied warranty, and breach of express warranty, and DENIED IN PART with respect to the plaintiffs' strict liability and negligent failure to warn claims, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/6/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
|
|
Filing
199
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment) denying 50 MOTION by C. R. Bard, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' Punitive Damages Claims, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/15/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER Plaintiffs' 72 Omnibus Motion re: Non-Retained Corporate Experts is DENIED; Plaintiffs' 69 Omnibus Motion re: Physician Experts is DENIED; C. R. Bard's 94 Motion to Exclude is DENIED; C. R. Bard's 101 Omnibus Motio n is DENIED; and Plaintiffs' 103 Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. The parties have leave to file additional expert-specific Daubert motions and the court will modify an existing PTO to reflect these deadlines. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 1/28/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
