Buckley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Maureen K. Buckley |
| C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited |
| 2:2014cv01398 |
| January 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 17 JOINDER by C. R. Bard, Inc. in Defendant Tissue Science Laboratories Limited's Oral Motion to Dismiss; plaintiff's claims against Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Bard are DISMISSED with pre judice; because no other defendants remain in the case, the plaintiff's case is closed and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/23/2017. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested) (kp)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TSL's Motion for immediate dismissal with prejudice is GRANTED as Moulded; the plaintiff is directed to pay TSL a $1,000.00 monetary sanction; in the event the plaintiff does not pay TSL $1,000.00 within 30 days, the plaintif f's claims against TSL shall be dismissed with prejudice without further notice to the plaintiff; and the Clerk is directed to post this order on the court's website for 30 days. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/13/2017. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested) (ts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
