Saunders v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
Linda Saunders |
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS |
2:2015cv12533 |
August 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph R Goodwin |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE/ORDER This action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs, attorneys' fees and expenses. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/6/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (brn) |
Filing 6 JOINT MOTION by Sofradim Production SAS, Linda Saunders, C. R. Bard, Inc. to Dismiss With Prejudice (Hobbs, Micah) (Modified on 7/5/2017 to add party filers) (skh). |
Filing 5 PLAINTIFF PROFILE FORM filed by Linda Saunders. (Aylstock, Bryan) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT INFORMATION FORM by Richard B. North, Jr on behalf of C. R. Bard, Inc.. (North, Richard) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE EXECUTED. Waiver signed by Richard B. North, Jr. on 11/10/2015. C. R. Bard, Inc. waiver mailed on 10/5/2015, answer due 12/4/2015. (North, Richard) |
Filing 2 TRANSMITTED PRETRIAL ORDER # 184 (Order re: Dismissal of Cross-Claims) entered on 08/05/2015 in MDL 2187 to attorneys in member case. (kp) |
Filing 1 SHORT FORM COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # 0425-4081220. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (eot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.