Burnett vs. Astrue
Michael Burnett |
Michael J. Astrue |
3:2007cv00517 |
August 20, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Mason |
Maurice G. Taylor, Jr. |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g RSI Tax Suits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying Plaintiff's 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. The like motion of the defendant is granted, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this case is dismissed and retired from the Court's docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maurice G. Taylor, Jr. on 9/8/2009. (cc: attys) (gan) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Burnett vs. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Burnett | |
Represented By: | Maria T. Goldcamp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Represented By: | Michael McGaughran |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.