Wikoff et al v. Western Regional Jail Medical Staff et al
| Michael David Wikoff, Christopher Michael Meyers and Zachary Fields |
| Western Regional Jail Medical Staff, Blevins, Morrison, Adams and Farmer |
| 3:2016cv04542 |
| May 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Cheryl A. Eifert |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; dismissing the 2 Complaint and removing this matter from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/17/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing Plaintiff Michael David Wikoff to pay the filing fee of $400 or submit to the Court an amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, which includes the institutional certification, or an inmate account transaction record; directing Plaintiffs Meyers and Fields to either pay the filing fee of $400, or submit to the Court an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; directing Plaintiffs to amend their complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order and cure various deficiencies in pleading, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 6/3/2016. (cc: Plaintiffs) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
