Mooney v. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. et al
| Bobby Mooney |
| CEVA Ground U.S., L.P., David Cox and CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. |
| 5:2019cv00078 |
| January 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to CEVA Ground U.S., L.P., CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc., David Cox, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 CEVA Ground, #2 David Cox) (slr) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Bobby Mooney for CEVA Ground U.S., L.P., CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc., and David Cox, re: #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 CEVA Ground Summons, #2 David Cox Summons) (slr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7044409. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (slr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
