Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cox et al v. Hudson Insurance Group
as 4:2026cv00071
Plaintiff:
Samuel Cox and David Cox
Defendant:
Hudson Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Cox v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv02496
Plaintiff:
David Cox
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Miller, George & Suggs, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Cox v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02037
Plaintiff:
David Cox
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc. doing business as The Transportation Solution, Inc., Martin Luther Crutison and CRST, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hubbard v. Cox et al
as 7:2026cv00111
Plaintiff:
Seth Micah Hubbard
Defendant:
David Cox, Major Hiner, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Cox et al.,
as 7:2026cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Martin
Defendant:
David Cox, Frederick Hiner, Hemlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00100
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Cox et al
as 7:2026cv00089
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jerod Smith
Defendant:
David Cox, Hemlick, Parker Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galvan v. Bondi et al
as 7:2026cv00062
Petitioner:
Javier Rodriguez Galvan
Respondent:
Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem, Todd M. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goebel v. Cox
as 4:2026cv00009
Plaintiff:
Noah W. Goebel
Defendant:
David Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Whitefield et al
as 1:2025cv01745
Plaintiff:
Jacob David Cox
Defendant:
Open Windows, LLC a domestic company doing business as Bulk Transport, Inc. and Troy Lamonte Whitefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
