Cases 1 - 10 of 16,928
McElroy v. Dawson County Municipality
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
David Jeffrey McElroy
Defendant:
Dawson County Municipality, Dawson County Misdemeanor Probation, Dawson County Felony Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02496
Plaintiff:
Onika Davis
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Fulton County, Georgia, Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
McElroy v. Beyers et al
as 1:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
David Jeffrey McElroy
Defendant:
Superior Court Judge Karen Beyers, David Whitman, Kacey Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02437
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Oliveira v. Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02441
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Oliveira
Defendant:
Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc., Wendy Cooper and Hailey Middlebrooks
Oliveira v. Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02442
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Oliveira
Defendant:
Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc. and Jane Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
