Cases 1 - 10 of 9,298
Deal v. Jackson et al.
as 1:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Renee Deal
Defendant:
Frank G. Jackson, Richard White and U.S. Surveillance Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer et al. v. Cleveland Clinic Union Hospital et al.
as 5:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
Dian Spencer, Jane Cummings and Dawn Etta Cummings
Defendant:
Cleveland Clinic Union Hospital and Euclid Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Richards v. Wasylyshyn et al.
as 3:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Richards
Defendant:
Mark Wasylyshyn, Heather Cleveland, Joshua Garber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thompson v. Landmark Recovery of Euclid LLC
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Deona Thompson
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Euclid, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
