Cases 41 - 50 of 17,271
Torry v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01476
Petitioner:
Kenneth Torry
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Santos-Bey et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Petitioner:
Erick Santos-Bey and Lawrence H. Morgan
Respondent:
Anthony Brown and Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClain v. Kavic et al
as 1:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Renard I McClain
Defendant:
Stephen Kavic, Corizon Health, Inc., Yescare Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun-EL v. Kiabayan et al
as 1:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
James Calhoun-EL
Defendant:
Hamid Kiabayan, Dr. Ford, Lum Maximuangu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Alonzo
as 1:2024cv01460
Plaintiff:
Kyeem King
Defendant:
Fateema Alonzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
Robert Gary Moore
Defendant:
Ronald Weber, Lark and Commissioner of Correctional Division of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Harford County Government et al
as 1:2024cv01459
Plaintiff:
Kory Putney
Defendant:
Harford County Government, Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler and Warden Daniel Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. States Attorney Office for Baltimore County
as 1:2024cv01458
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mauice Watts
Defendant:
States Attorney Office for Baltimore County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01438
Petitioner:
Jamar Middleton
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Spencer v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Thurman Spencer
Respondent:
Robert Dean and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
