Cases 21 - 30 of 76,986
Torry v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01476
Petitioner:
Kenneth Torry
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kostroun v. 24x7 Networks, LLC
as 1:2024cv01463
Plaintiff:
William Kostroun
Defendant:
24x7 Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Patent Armory, Inc. v. California Tortilla Group, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01469
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory, Inc.
Defendant:
California Tortilla
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strine v. O' Malley
as 8:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Strine
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hussain v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2024cv01461
Plaintiff:
Imran Hussain
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Teat v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
William Aaron Teat, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thinn v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Montoya Thinn
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 8:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Mosisa v. Perry
as 8:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Fever Mosisa
Defendant:
Tyler Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Euro Restaurant Solutions, Inc. v. Pilla
as 8:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Euro Restaurant Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Anthony Pilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
