Cases 31 - 40 of 228,062
ESTATE OF DIANE DESCHAMPS et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv06903
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF DIANE DESCHAMPS and PAULA SHULTZ
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith
as 3:2024cv06920
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Greene County, Tennessee v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06919
Plaintiff:
Greene County, Tennessee
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC, NOVO NORDISK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NORIEGA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv06896
Petitioner:
JEAN NORIEGA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DANIELS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv06898
Petitioner:
TYQUAN DANIELS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
