Cases 41 - 50 of 7,723
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Thompson v. Villa et al
as 2:2024cv01372
Defendant:
Oregon Correctional Enterprises, Lorie Hensel, Carlos Villa and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Whitley v. Lobato et al
as 6:2024cv01357
Defendant:
Nicole P. Lobato, The City of Albany and Samuel D. Posthuma
Plaintiff:
Mandy N. Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01348
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Chirre v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2024cv01334
Defendant:
Portland Police Bureau, John and Jane Does 1-7 and City of Portland
Plaintiff:
Karen Chirre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borgen v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Palmer Borgen
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Meadowlark Senior Living (Compass), Dr. Vincent Gimino/Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
T. W. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv01326
Defendant:
Dan Berger, Tony Baker, Amira Guadalupe Andrade and others
Plaintiff:
T. W.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
