Cases 41 - 50 of 10,324
Walker v. State of Oregon
as 2:2024cv01417
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Petitioner:
Ronnie C. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. State of Oregon
as 2:2024cv01418
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Petitioner:
Ronnie C. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Felix-Puac v. Miller
as 2:2024cv01400
Petitioner:
Alejandro Santos Felix-Puac
Respondent:
Jaime Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Campos et al
as 2:2024cv01410
Defendant:
Abraham Campos, Victor Perez-Carillo, Mclarenhan and others
Plaintiff:
Tai'Von Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rascoe v. Hillcrest Oregon Youth Authority et al
as 3:2024cv01406
Defendant:
Oregon Juvenile Parole and Probation, Nicole O'Donnel, Elliot Browdy and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Dallas Rascoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menefee v. Hill
as 3:2024cv01407
Defendant:
Nolin Hill
Plaintiff:
LeAndrew-LaRonn: Menefee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Woodland, et al
as 2:2024cv01409
Defendant:
TLC Committee, Snake River Correctional Institution and Joe Woodland
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Villars et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Defendant:
Lt. Buchard, Christopher Scarr, Larry Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Shane V. M. Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menefee v. Deputy Gonzalez
as 3:2024cv01408
Defendant:
Deputy Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
LeAndrew Laronn Menefee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Nelson et al
as 6:2024cv01402
Defendant:
Curtis Peler, Mike Highsmith and Shane Newmon Nelson
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
