Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16695
Plaintiff:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
TILE, MATCH GROUP, INC., BASECAMP and others
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Named Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members, et al v. Apple Inc.
as 23-15416
Not Classified By Court:
In re: APPLE INC. DEVICE PERFORMANCE LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NAMED PLAINTIFFS AND SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS
Appellant:
SARAH FELDMAN and HONDO JAN
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Taiming Zhang v. Apple, Inc.
as 23-15740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAIMING ZHANG
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Lucila Baptiste v. Apple Inc.
as 23-15392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUCILA BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Frank Custodero, et al v. Apple Inc.
as 22-16916
Not Classified By Court:
In re: APPLE INC. APP STORE SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK CUSTODERO, RICO VIGLIETTI, LUE STEPHENS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Frank Custodero, et al v. Apple Inc.
as 22-16914
Not Classified By Court:
In re: APPLE INC. APP STORE SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRANK CUSTODERO, RICO VIGLIETTI, LUE STEPHENS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
APPLE INC.
Hadona Diep, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 22-16514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HADONA DIEP and RYUMEI NAGAO
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
SaurikIT, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 22-16527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAURIKIT, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Apple Inc., et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70220
Not Classified By Court:
In re: APPLE INC., TIMOTHY D. COOK, LUCA MAESTRI and others
Petitioner:
APPLE INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
