Cases 11 - 20 of 429,586
BURNSIDE v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
DARRELL DARRON BURNSIDE
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, ADAM SUTTON and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. D. Alexander Fund I, LP et al
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jason McClure
Defendant:
D. Alexander Fund I, LP and D. Alexander Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SOLOMON v. BRAHAM et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARNELL SOLOMON
Defendant:
BRAHAM and J FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANG v. DIRECTOR OF USCIS TAMPA ASYLUM OFFICE
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
AIHUA TANG
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF USCIS TAMPA ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
IRVIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 5:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
PHILLIS IRVIN
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LYNN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
JOHN BUFORD LYNN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MAKENDY v. SUMMERS et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
ALFRED MAKENDY
Defendant:
W SUMMERS, MAJOR CHILDS, T MCCROWSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYDE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS and ANGELA LILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
