Cases 11 - 20 of 15,641
Beyer, Jacob v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00659
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Petitioner:
Jacob Richard Beyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Forsythe, Amanda v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Forsythe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00660
Defendant:
Darcy La Flamme, Judge Kelly Thimm, Officer Todd Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heyerholm, Rita et al v. Johnson, Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv00328
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00661
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kleinschmidt, Keith v. Poppe, Amanda et al
as 3:2024cv00663
Defendant:
Amanda Poppe and Barron County Jail
Plaintiff:
Keith C. Kleinschmidt and Keith Carl Kleinschmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zameeruddin, Rizvana v. University of Wisconsin-Parkside et al
as 3:2024cv00654
Defendant:
University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Scott Menke and others
Plaintiff:
Rizvana Zameeruddin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pevonka, Jean v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00655
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Jean Pevonka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hildreth, Kenneth v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00656
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hildreth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
