Cases 191 - 200 of 15,661
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Prysok, Chris et al v. Town of Bell, Board of Supervisors
as 3:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Paddle Ride Adventure, LLC and Chris Prysok
Defendant:
Town of Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brandon, Jenniffer v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Jenniffer R. Brandon
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Zloza, Joseph v. City of New Lisbon et al
as 3:2024cv00535
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, City of Mauston, Department of Navy and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott, Steven v. Dietrich, Tabatha et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Defendant:
Rachel Matushak, J. Ludwig, E. Davidson and others
Unknown:
GBCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Steven Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmes, Whitney v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Whitney D. Harmes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lloyd, Nathaniel v. Department of Corrections, Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J. Lloyd
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections, Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frick, Tyler v. Progressive Corporation
as 3:2024cv00574
Defendant:
Progressive Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tyler C. Frick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pick, Jason v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00573
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Pick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
