Cases 71 - 80 of 8,042
Arriaga v. USA
as 3:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
Angel Arriaga
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Case Opened in Error
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Markas L. Holland
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02078
Petitioner:
Joseph Orlando Roberts
Respondent:
Katrina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Porter v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02077
Petitioner:
Wayne Porter
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guin v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02076
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Guin, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina Adult Corrections and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Leon Jackson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orr v. State of NC
as 3:2024cv00359
Petitioner:
Eric Christopher Orr
Respondent:
State of NC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
