General Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,366
Newsome v. US Marshall Services et al
as 7:2024cv01287
Defendant: The Federal Republic of Germany and US Marshall Services
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Todd Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McQueen v. Lamar
as 1:2024cv00346
Petitioner: Roger McQueen
Respondent: David Lamar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crowell v. Rooker (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00586
Defendant: G. Rooker
Plaintiff: Rodriquez Crowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Posey v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01232
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Daniel Posey, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01233
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Robert Elijah Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moreta v. Neely
as 7:2024cv01228
Petitioner: Virginia Garcia Moreta
Defendant: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodgett v. Babers et al (INMATE4)
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff: Benny Lee Woodgett
Defendant: Steven T. Marshall and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00560
Plaintiff: Ometris Williams
Defendant: Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Orso v. Houston
as 1:2024cv00310
Respondent: Sam Houston
Petitioner: Ricky A. Orso, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Galanis v. Keyes (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00542
Defendant: R. D. Keyes
Plaintiff: Jason Galanis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?