Cases 1 - 10 of 6,870
Mounce v. Hickman et al
as 4:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Mounce
Defendant:
Jason Hickman and Charles Sams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Texas County, Missouri
as 6:2024cv03182
Plaintiff:
Bentley Walker, Regina Walker, D.S. and others
Defendant:
Texas County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Morris, III
Defendant:
Unknown Davis and Participating Officers On Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Pitt
as 4:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Morgan
Defendant:
Karen Pitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz v. Butler County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Quinton Wesley Schultz
Defendant:
Butler County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Missouri Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Estes
Defendant:
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eric S. Schmitt, Karen L. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Street v. Hinman et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Keith Dominic Street
Defendant:
Roy Hinman, Caitlin Douglas and Garret A. Swims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Potosi Correctional Center et al
as 4:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Ryan Terrell Patterson
Defendant:
Potosi Correctional Center, David Vandergriff, Jennifer Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Edwards v. Keen et al
as 4:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, Medical David Unknown, Medical Sarah Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Dunklin County Jail
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Kelly D. Carter
Defendant:
Dunklin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
