Cases 1 - 10 of 5,991
Hemingway v. City of North Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2024cv03553
Plaintiff:
La'Nisha Hemingway
Defendant:
City of North Myrtle Beach, Dana Crowell, Mike Pacileo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Gaillard v. Hill-Finklea Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv03496
Plaintiff:
Percy Devon Gaillard
Defendant:
Hill-Finklea Detention Center, Major Anthony Fyall, Cpt. Archie Beau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabata v. City of Hanahan et al
as 2:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Luxolo Tabata
Defendant:
City of Hanahan, Mildred Rowell and Private First Class Goss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
McClellan v. Stirling
as 9:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alston v. Beck et al
as 0:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Judge Walton Henry Beck and County of York, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dawkins v. Newberry County et al
as 8:2024cv03435
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Dawkins
Defendant:
Newberry County and Fairfield County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Breyan v. McCormick Courts
as 8:2024cv03428
Plaintiff:
Michael A Breyan
Defendant:
McCormick Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wazney v. Sumter County
as 3:2024cv03436
Plaintiff:
Robert W Wazney
Defendant:
Sumter County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Mack v. Barnette et al
as 7:2024cv03401
Plaintiff:
John Willie Mack, Jr
Defendant:
Barry Joe Barnette, John David Burgess and Manuel J. Ortundo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
