Cases 21 - 30 of 158,900
Rosario v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04863
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Denis Rosario
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv04497
Plaintiff:
Lewis L. Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Brad A. Barber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
May S Stilson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Dale Rodney Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
De Jesus v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Deborah Canales De Jesus
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Maxwell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06400
Plaintiff:
Sharon Michelle Maxwell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burnside v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Burnside
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodgers v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Rodgers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
