Cases 11 - 20 of 17,283
Jones v. North Branch Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv01645
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones, Joshua Jones and Joshua C. Jones
Defendant:
North Branch Correctional Institution and Western Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barmer v. Pentow
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
David A. Barmer
Defendant:
Alexander Pentow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenstry v. Gamble et al
as 1:2024cv01636
Plaintiff:
Lamar T. McKenstry
Defendant:
Raphael Gamble, Melvin Norman, Fred Hinneh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. USA - 2255
as 8:2024cv01676
Petitioner:
Tiba Sakuri Conley
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Watson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner:
James Watson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Service et al
as 1:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Vander Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Service, Roxbury Correctional Institution and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01666
Petitioner:
Wallace Allen
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dingle v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner:
Donte Lamont Dingle
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ong v. Scruggs
as 1:2024cv01662
Petitioner:
Lye H. Ong
Respondent:
Carolyn J. Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
