Cases 41 - 50 of 17,283
Witherspoon v. Warden, Ronald S. Weber
as 1:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden, Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNair v. Abello et al
as 1:2024cv01481
Petitioner:
Michael McNair
Respondent:
Frederick Abello and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Stewart
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
Dwayne Douglas
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vaughan v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Vaughan
Defendant:
Warden Keith Arnold, Asst Warden Bethany Cornchia, Chief of Security Ronald Stotler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01541
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bey v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01546
Petitioner:
Bernardy Bey
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stitely v. Yes Care
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
David Stitely
Defendant:
Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fooks, Jr v. Warden of Patuxent et al
as 1:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Anton Fooks, Jr
Defendant:
Warden of Patuxent and Corizen Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tracy v. Hakim et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Petitioner:
Terance A Tracy
Respondent:
Kakia Hakim and Attorney General for Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Warden of W.C.I. et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Petitioner:
Darrius Jordan
Respondent:
Warden of W.C.I. and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
