Cases 81 - 90 of 644,414
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00481
Plaintiff:
Maria Christina Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Steele v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00478
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Steele
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bowen v. HomeGoods, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Kathy Bowen
Defendant:
HomeGoods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
SN Servicing Corporation v. 2022 Sagent M&C, LLC
as 1:2024cv03642
Plaintiff:
SN Servicing Corporation
Defendant:
2022 Sagent M&C, LLC doing business as Sagent Lending Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kiefer v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv03636
Plaintiff:
Alexia Kiefer
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NFLASH, INC., v. COMNET TECHNOLOGY GROUP et al
as 5:2024cv03634
Plaintiff:
NFLASH, INC., a California corporation doing business as OEMPCWorld.com
Defendant:
COMNET TECHNOLOGY GROUP and LUIS B. RIEFKOHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bond et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al
as 4:2024cv03637
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Bond and Victoria Pike Bond
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Forest Chief Randy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03632
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
