Cases 1 - 10 of 7,922
Jordan v. Norman et al
as 4:2024cv04118
Plaintiff:
John L. Jordan
Defendant:
Jerome Ray Norman and Skyline Transportation Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Milsap v. Clay County et al
as 3:2024cv03017
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramone Milsap
Respondent:
Clay County and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wong v. Warden, Yankton Federal Prison Camp
as 4:2024cv04117
Petitioner:
Eugene Ka Lok Wong
Respondent:
Warden, Yankton Federal Prison Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wickstrom v. ACE American Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv05046
Plaintiff:
David Wickstrom
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Peachey v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04116
Plaintiff:
Nathan Peachey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. US Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2024cv04115
Plaintiff:
Brad Lee Jones
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pelton v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anderson Pelton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
United States of America v. Charging Crow
as 5:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lynette Charging Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Replevin & Conversion
Schurman v. Luke et al
as 4:2024cv04113
Petitioner:
Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Respondent:
Steven Luke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schurman v Luke et al
as 4:2024cv04114
Petitioner:
Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Defendant:
Steven Luke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
