Cases 1 - 10 of 15,627
Gessel v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gessel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Winterer v. United States
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Gregory
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Tischer v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tischer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ashby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05056
Plaintiff:
Marissa Ashby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hasbrouck v. Depositors Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Beth Hasbrouck
Defendant:
Depositors Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Neifert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas Neifert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Commet v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Mark Commet
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Quantrille v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03083
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Quantrille
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GVD Hospitality Management Services Inc. et al v. Ruby Hotels Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
GVD Hospitality Management Services Inc. and Davenport District Hospitality, Inc.
Defendant:
Ruby Hotels Ltd. and Ruby GmbH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
