Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California between January 1, 2016 and November 30, 2016
Cases 51 - 60 of 13,503
Antonio M. Flores v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv08859
Defendant: Does, RITE AID Corporation Long-Term Disability Plan and The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff: Antonio M Flores
Type: Contract Insurance
USA v. Hui Yun Kim
as 2:2016cv08868
Defendant: Hui Yun Kim
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cheryl Rene Lucas v. Carolyn W. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv02464
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Cheryl Rene Lucas
Paul Ron Fertig et al v. Patricia A. Moore et al
as 2:2016cv08860
Defendant: Doe and Patricia A. Moore
Plaintiff: Leda Fertig, Paul Ron Fertig, David Melton and others
Netecs Corporation v. Damon McClure We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv02452
Defendant: DOES and Damon McClure
Counter Claimant: Damon McClure
Counter Defendant: Netecs Corporation, Chris Tooley and Jeffrey Tooley
Plaintiff: Netecs Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02451
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
S.A.N. Nutrition Corporation v. American Muscle Supply, Inc. d/b/a Chrome Supps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv08842
Defendant: American Muscle Supply, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff: S.A.N. Nutrition Corporation
Kory Armes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2016cv08820
Plaintiff: Kory Armes
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08848
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08821
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?