Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Han et al v. Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC
as 3:2016cv03759
Plaintiff:
John Han , Alice Lai-Bitker and Veris Eastbay Homecare, Inc.
Defendant:
Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. FCA US, LLC
as 5:2016cv03551
Plaintiff:
Mathew Enterprise, Inc.
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capelli Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Fantastic Sams Salons Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv03401
Plaintiff:
Capelli Enterprises, Inc. , Nameer Jalel and Aseel Issa
Defendant:
Fantastic Sams Salons Corporation and Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Latronica v. England
as 4:2016cv02870
Plaintiff:
Melanie Chantell Latronica
Defendant:
Morrison C. England, Jr., James P Morrison, Muriel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kamdar et al v. Cyclebar Franchising, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02704
Plaintiff:
Tejal Kamdar , Meera Kamdar and Jason Snyder
Defendant:
Cyclebar Franchising, LLC, William Pryor and Heather Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fraser et al v. Brightstar Franchising LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01966
Defendant:
Brightstar Franchising LLC , Shelly Sun , Sean Fitzgerald and others
Plaintiff:
Cosmo Fraser and Adam Fraser
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Pacific Union International, Inc. v. Christie's International Real Estate, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01932
Plaintiff:
Pacific Union International, Inc.
Defendant:
Christie's International Real Estate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Volkswagen Group of America
as 3:2016cv01886
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Armstrong
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2310 (c)
Quintana & Quintana Corp. v. SanDisk Corp.
as 5:2016cv01735
Plaintiff:
Quintana & Quintana Corp.
Defendant:
Sandisk Corp.
Shah v. Jackson Hewitt Inc.
as 3:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Shah
Defendant:
Jackson Hewitt Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
