Cases 31 - 40 of 166
B&S GLASS, INCORPORATED et al v. DEL METRO, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02769
Defendant:
DEL METRO, INCORPORATED and GARY DELLOVADE
Plaintiff:
MELISSA LOPEZ, B&S GLASS, INCORPORATED and LUIS BOTTANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. FEI-WINMAR JV, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03394
Defendant:
FEI-WINMAR JV, LLC, FEI-WINMAR JOINT VENTURE, QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
LONG FENCE COMPANY, INC. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
INOGEN, INC. v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv02675
Defendant:
SEEMA VERMA, PALMETTO GBA, LLC and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
INOGEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. v. WINMAR CONSTRUCTION INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02501
Plaintiff:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Defendant:
FORNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., FEI-WINMAR JV, LLC, WINMAR CONSTRUCTION INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WOLKOFF
as 1:2020cv02935
Defendant:
STEPHANIE WINSTON WOLKOFF
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
LIU v. WEI
as 1:2020cv02625
Plaintiff:
HUAIZHAO LIU
Defendant:
JINGSHENG WEI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv02673
Plaintiff:
PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC.
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. JOYCE JR. et al
as 1:2020cv02445
Defendant:
DANAHER CORPORATION, THOMAS P. JOYCE JR., JOHN T. SCHWIETERS and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and HARRY MARKARIAN
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv03081
Not Classified By Court:
Andy Bang and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv03097
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
WOODWARD HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
